The Implementation of Inclusion in Corruption Case Handling

Syachdin Syachdin
Abstract Views : 42 | PDF Downloads : 5

Abstract


The formulation of problem in the implementation of inclusion in handling corruption case has reflected the legal objectives which are legal certainty, justice, and expediency, and inconsistency in implementing the inclusion in handling corruption case, the purpose of the research is To find out and analyze the application of inclusion in handling corruption case has reflected the legal purposes which are legal certainty, justice and expediency and To find out and analyze the inconsistency in applying of inclusion in handling of corruption case, using empirical research method which resulted that there is indication that the implementation of inclusion is not yet implemented which causing inconsistency of law enforcement officer, i.e., Police, Attorney in applying the article of inclusion in handling of case corruption and inconsistency in the application of inclusion in corruption cases causes the occurrence of discrimination in the process of law enforcement, so that does not reflect the legal purpose of legal certainty. It is recommended that to create legal objectives, law enforcement officers must be consistent in applying the articles of inclusion in the handling of corruption cases and to achieve legal certainty should investigators, and prosecutors apply the juridical participation in corruption cases.

 

Keywords: Implementation, Inclusion, Corruption Case


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abidin, A.Z. (1983). Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita

Aruan Sakidjo and Bambang Poernomo. (1990). Hukum Pidana Dasar Aturan umum Hukum Pidana Kodifikasi. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Chazawi, Adami. (2011). Percobaan dan Penyertaan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada

D. Simons. (1992). Sebagai Pelaku dan Keturutsertaan (Daderschap en deelneming)” dalam Kitab Pelajaran Hukum Pidana (Leerboek van Het Nederlandse Straftrecht) diterjemahkan oleh P.A.F. Lamintang, Bandung: Pionir Jaya.

dan Dwidja Priyatno. (2010). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta: Kencana

Efendi, Marwan. (2013). Korupsi dan Strategi Nasional. Jakarta: Press Group.

M. Sholehhuddin. (2007). Sistem Sanksi dalam Hukum Pidana, Ide Dasar Double Track System dan Implementasinya. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Muladi. (1985). Dampak Disparitas Pidana dan Usaha mengatasinya. Bandung: Alumni.

Muladi. (2002). Hak Asasi Manusia, Politik dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Muladi. (2004). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Semarang: UNDIP,

Rohim. (2008). Modus Operandi Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Pena Multi Media.

Yunara, Edi. (2005). Korupsi dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Berikut Studi Kasus. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti

Code of Criminal Law Procedure (KUHAP).

Court Ruling: 29 / Pid.Sus-TKP / 2016 / PN. Pal.Kitab Undang-Undang HukumAcaraPidana (KUHAP).

Criminal Code.

Law Number 1 Year 2004 about State Treasury.

Law Number 17 Year 2003 about State Finances.

Law Number 20 Year 2001 Concerning Amendment to Law Number 31 Year 1999 About Corruption Eradication.

Law Number 31 Year 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v12no1.1239

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (ISSN Online: 2477-6238 | ISSN Print: 1978-5186) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.