The Prosecutor’s Authority to Conduct a Criminal Investigation Based on The Government Administration Law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v2i1.2214

Abstract

This research uses a normative approach, which is carried out by examining laws and theories. Also, this study uses a case approach, namely the 2017 village fund corruption case in Pekon Sukaratu. The main problem in this res­earch is what is the authority of the prosecutor in conducting investigations into criminal acts of corruption after the passage of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration and whether the investigation carried out by the prosecutor at the Pringsewu District Prosecutor's Office in coordination with the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus or Aparatur Pengawas Internal Pemerintah (APIP) against the allegations a criminal act of corruption in the management of village funds in 2017 in Pekon Sukaratu whose losses to the state have been returned have met the principle of legal certainty. The research results show that the prosecutor has the authority to carry out the law enforcement process, namely the investigation of suspected corruption crimes as stipulated in Article 30 paragraph (1) letter d of the law on the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. Based on the results of the research that has been done, it is better if changes in laws and regulations related to the elements of corruption in Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crime because there is a product of the Constitutional Court with the decision No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016. Besides, there is a need for socialization for prosecutors regarding their authority in TPK investigations and related to coordination patterns with the authority of APIP in carrying out investigations and calculating state financial losses.

Keywords:

Prosecutor’s, Authority, Administration, Criminal

References

M. Hadjon, Philiphus, et.all, 2012, Hukum Administrasi dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Cetakan Kedua, Gajahmada University Press, Yogyakarta.

Yasin, Muhammad, et.all, 2017, Anotasi Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi pemerintahan, Depok: Universitas Indonesia – Center for Study of Governance and Administrative Reform (UI-CSGAR).

Barhamudin, Barhamudin. “Penyalahgunaan Kewenangan Pejabat Pemerintahan Dan Ruang Lingkupnya Menurut Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” Solusi 17, no. 2 (May 1, 2019): 175–92. https://doi.org/10.36546/solusi.v17i2.171.

Bolifaar, Andhy Hermawan, and Henry Dianto Pardamean Sinaga. “Managing Evidence of Tax Crime in Indonesia: An Artificial Intelligence Approach in Integrated Criminal Justice System.” A Y E R JOURNAL 27, no. 1 (October 5, 2020): 143–58. https://doi.org/10.1445/AYERJOURNAL.V27I1.128.

Heryansyah, Despan. “PROBLEMATIKA DISKRESI DALAM SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA (STUDI TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 30 TAHON 2014).” Jurnal Yuridis. Vol. 2, September 14, 2015. https://doi.org/10.35586/.V2I2.204.

Kurnia, Vani, Sahuri Lasmadi, and Elizabeth Siregar. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tugas Dan Kewenangan Jaksa Sebagai Penyidik Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi 2020.” Pampas Journal of Criminal Law 1, no. 3 (2020): 1–11. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Pampas/article/view/11084.

Manao, Disiplin F. “Penyelesaian Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Oleh Aparatur Pemerintah Dari Segi Hukum Administrasi Dihubungkan Dengan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika 2, no. 1 (March 31, 2018): 1. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v2i1.158.

Mumu, Gratia Debora. “KEWENANGAN JAKSA SEBAGAI PENYIDIK TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI 1 Oleh: Gratia Debora Mumu 2.” LEX ADMINISTRATUM. Vol. 4, March 16, 2016. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/administratum/article/view/11503.

NOURMA DEWI, DIKA YUDANTO. “Sinkronisasi Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintah Dengan Undang-Undang Tindak Pidak Korupsi Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Pejabat Pemerintah Di Indonesia.” Serambi Hukum 10, no. 02 (January 30, 2017): 32–45. https://www.neliti.com/publications/163578/.

Nurhayati, Ratna, and Seno Wibowo Gumbira. “PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PUBLIK DAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 6, no. 1 (March 31, 2017): 41. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.6.1.2017.41-66.

Panjaitan, Marojahan. “PENYELESAIAN PENYALAHGUNAAN WEWENANG YANG MENIMBULKAN KERUGIAN NEGARA MENURUT HUKUM ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 24, no. 3 (July 2017): 431–47. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss3.art5.

Putrijanti, Aju, and Lapon Tukan Leonard. “Kompetensi Peratun Untuk Memeriksa Unsur Penyalahgunaan Wewenang.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 7, no. 1 (April 23, 2019): 107–27. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v7i1.605.

Sahlan, Mohammad. “Kewenangan Peradilan Tipikor Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” Arena Hukum 9, no. 2 (2016): 166–89. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2016.00902.2.

Simanjuntak, Enrico Parulian. “PERKARA ADVOKASI PUBLIK PASCA BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN (UUAP).” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 6, no. 1 (April 27, 2018): 14. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v6i1.535.

Sutrisno, Sutrisno, and Ibnu Artadi. “IMPLEMENTASI PENEGAKKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PASCA BERLAKUNYA UU NO 30 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN.” HERMENEUTIKA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 2 (September 28, 2019). https://doi.org/10.33603/hermeneutika.v3i2.2600.

Yuliastuti, Eka, and Iain Metro. “AL-WATHAN: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah PROBLEMATIKA YANG DIHADAPI JAKSA DALAM PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (Studi Kasus Pada Kejaksaan Negeri Karanganyar).” Al-Wathan: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah. Vol. 1, January 8, 2020. https://jurnal.stisda.ac.id/index.php/wathanDOI:https://doi.org/.

Zulkarnaen, Zulkarnaen, Zainal Asikin, and Amiruddin Amiruddin. “Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Setelah Berlakunya UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” JESS (Journal of Education on Social Science) 4, no. 1 (June 1, 2020): 53–66. https://doi.org/10.24036/JESS.V4I1.233.

The Constitutional Court Decision No. 28/PUU-V/2007.

The Constitutional Court Decision No No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Total Abstract Views: 3 | Total Downloads: 6

Downloads

Authors

  • Leonardo Adiguna Kejaksaan Negeri Pringsewu, Indonesia

Published

2021-05-21

Issue

Section

Artikel