Judicial Oversight on Administrative Decisions in Afghanistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v3i2.2775Abstract
Administrative decisions in Afghanistan are currently made without the support of written administrative laws or effective mechanisms for judicial oversight due to the national unstable situation from war. This article which is titled “Judicial Oversight on Administrative Decisions in Afghanistan” aims to investigate this issue and propose a dedicated mechanism for judicial oversight. This qualitative research was performed to answer a research question on administrative decisions and its judicial oversight. Desk review method was used, and interviews were conducted with academics in Administrative law. This article also explains the judicial oversight applied by other countries. The findings reveal that Afghanistan lacks an adequate mechanism for judicial oversight of administrative decisions, ruling out the feasibility of adopting models such as the administrative court system seen in France. Afghanistan needs to undergo significant reforms within the judicial system to effectively resolve administrative disputes. A crucial step is the urgent enactment of an Administrative Procedure Law tailored for the administrative court, aimed at streamlining investigation procedures, reducing court expenses, and improving citizen access to justice, thereby strengthening the rule of law in Afghanistan.
Keywords:
Administrative Acts, Administrative Decisions, Citizens Rights, Discretion, Judicial OversightReferences
Aziz, et al. (2012). Max Plank Manual on Administrative Law in Afghanistan. Kabul: Max Plank Institute.
Danish, S. (2015). Afghanistan Administrative Law. Kabul: Ibni Sena University Press.
Faiez, N. (2017). Judicial oversight in Afghanistan. Kabul, Kabul University Faculty of law.
Hadavand, M. et al. (2012). Administrative Procedure in Administrative law: Comparative study. Tehran: Khursandi.
Khalil Nezhad, R. (2015). Administrative Law. Tehran: Majd.
Mukhlis, Massoud, Judicial Control on Administrative Acts in Afghanistan. Kabul: Islamic Azad University, Faculty of Law.
Kohistani, M. Jafar. (2014). Constitutional Law, Kabul: Mustaqbal.
Qazi, G. (2016). Administrative Law. Kabul: Saied.
Cass R. Sunstein, Alan B. Morrison, Kenneth W. Starr & Richard K. Willard. (1987). Judicial Review of Administrative Action in a Conservative Era. 39 Administrative Law Review 353.
Daniel Hoadley, Joe Tomlinson, Editha Nemsic & Cassandra Somers-Joce, (2022). How Public is Public Law? The Current State of Open Access to Administrative Court Judgments, Judicial Review, 27(2): 95-98, Doi: 10.1080/10854681.2022.2111966.
De Coste. F.C. (2001). Redeeming the Rule of Law: Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law, T.R.S. Allan, (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 39 Alberta L. Rev. 1004. Available online https://philpapers.org/rec/RSACJA-2.
Faiez, N. (2020). Administrative Law Principles in Afghanistan’s Administrative Law: A Step toward Good Public Administration. Ijsrm.Human 15(2): 311-324. Available online https://ijsrm.humanjournals.com/2020/04/.
Janina Boughey. (2013). Administrative Law: The Next Frontier for Comparative Law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 62: 55-95. Available online https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-and-comparative-law-quarterly/article/abs/administrative-law-the-next-frontier-for-comparative-law/4893471CC189B34D0A0D00DF256FBC73.
Jordao, E. & Rose-Ackerman,S. (2014). Judicial Review of Executive Policymaking in Advanced Democracies: Beyond Rights Review, 66 Admin. L. Rev. 1.
Kalen S. (2016). The Death of Administrative Common Law or the Rise of the Administrative Procedure Act, 68 Rutgers L. Rev. 605.
Rubenstein, K. & Schultz J. (1996). Bringing Law and Order to International Trade: Administrative Law Principles and the GATT/WTO. St. John's J.L. Comm. 11(2): 271.
Shepherd,G.B. (1996). FIERCE COMPROMISE: The Administrative Procedure Act Emerges from New Deal Politics, 90 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1557.
Yusufzada, S, Xia, Z. and Xia, Z. (2019). Public Administration in Afghanistan: Challenges and Way Forward. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7, 142-160. available online https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=93117.
W. John Hopkins, Ombudsman. (2016). Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law [MPECCoL], August findable at: https://oxcon.ouplaw.com/search?sfam=&q=Ombudsman+W.+John+Hopkins&prd=MPECCOL&searchBtn=Search.
Afghanistan Constitution (2004). Title 818 Afghanistan.
Administrative procedure Law (2018). Title 1298 Afghanistan
https://www.britannica.com/topic/procuracy#info-article-history
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2022 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




