Judicial Oversight on Administrative Decisions in Afghanistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v3i2.2775

Abstract

Administrative decisions in Afghanistan are currently made without the support of written administrative laws or effective mechanisms for judicial oversight due to the national unstable situation from war. This article which is titled “Judicial Oversight on Administrative Decisions in Afghanistan” aims to investigate this issue and propose a dedicated mechanism for judicial oversight. This qualitative research was performed to answer a research question on administrative decisions and its judicial oversight. Desk review method was used, and interviews were conducted with academics in Administrative law. This article also explains the judicial oversight applied by other countries. The findings reveal that Afghanistan lacks an adequate mechanism for judicial oversight of administrative decisions, ruling out the feasibility of adopting models such as the administrative court system seen in France. Afghanistan needs to undergo significant reforms within the judicial system to effectively resolve administrative disputes.  A crucial step is the urgent enactment of an Administrative Procedure Law tailored for the administrative court, aimed at streamlining investigation procedures, reducing court expenses, and improving citizen access to justice, thereby strengthening the rule of law in Afghanistan.

Keywords:

Administrative Acts, Administrative Decisions, Citizens Rights, Discretion, Judicial Oversight

References

Aziz, et al. (2012). Max Plank Manual on Administrative Law in Afghanistan. Kabul: Max Plank Institute.

Danish, S. (2015). Afghanistan Administrative Law. Kabul: Ibni Sena University Press.

Faiez, N. (2017). Judicial oversight in Afghanistan. Kabul, Kabul University Faculty of law.

Hadavand, M. et al. (2012). Administrative Procedure in Administrative law: Comparative study. Tehran: Khursandi.

Khalil Nezhad, R. (2015). Administrative Law. Tehran: Majd.

Mukhlis, Massoud, Judicial Control on Administrative Acts in Afghanistan. Kabul: Islamic Azad University, Faculty of Law.

Kohistani, M. Jafar. (2014). Constitutional Law, Kabul: Mustaqbal.

Qazi, G. (2016). Administrative Law. Kabul: Saied.

Cass R. Sunstein, Alan B. Morrison, Kenneth W. Starr & Richard K. Willard. (1987). Judicial Review of Administrative Action in a Conservative Era. 39 Administrative Law Review 353.

Daniel Hoadley, Joe Tomlinson, Editha Nemsic & Cassandra Somers-Joce, (2022). How Public is Public Law? The Current State of Open Access to Administrative Court Judgments, Judicial Review, 27(2): 95-98, Doi: 10.1080/10854681.2022.2111966.

De Coste. F.C. (2001). Redeeming the Rule of Law: Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law, T.R.S. Allan, (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 39 Alberta L. Rev. 1004. Available online https://philpapers.org/rec/RSACJA-2.

Faiez, N. (2020). Administrative Law Principles in Afghanistan’s Administrative Law: A Step toward Good Public Administration. Ijsrm.Human 15(2): 311-324. Available online https://ijsrm.humanjournals.com/2020/04/.

Janina Boughey. (2013). Administrative Law: The Next Frontier for Comparative Law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 62: 55-95. Available online https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-and-comparative-law-quarterly/article/abs/administrative-law-the-next-frontier-for-comparative-law/4893471CC189B34D0A0D00DF256FBC73.

Jordao, E. & Rose-Ackerman,S. (2014). Judicial Review of Executive Policymaking in Advanced Democracies: Beyond Rights Review, 66 Admin. L. Rev. 1.

Kalen S. (2016). The Death of Administrative Common Law or the Rise of the Administrative Procedure Act, 68 Rutgers L. Rev. 605.

Rubenstein, K. & Schultz J. (1996). Bringing Law and Order to International Trade: Administrative Law Principles and the GATT/WTO. St. John's J.L. Comm. 11(2): 271.

Shepherd,G.B. (1996). FIERCE COMPROMISE: The Administrative Procedure Act Emerges from New Deal Politics, 90 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1557.

Yusufzada, S, Xia, Z. and Xia, Z. (2019). Public Administration in Afghanistan: Challenges and Way Forward. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7, 142-160. available online https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=93117.

W. John Hopkins, Ombudsman. (2016). Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law [MPECCoL], August findable at: https://oxcon.ouplaw.com/search?sfam=&q=Ombudsman+W.+John+Hopkins&prd=MPECCOL&searchBtn=Search.

Afghanistan Constitution (2004). Title 818 Afghanistan.

Administrative procedure Law (2018). Title 1298 Afghanistan

https://www.britannica.com/topic/procuracy#info-article-history

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Total Abstract Views: 34 | Total Downloads: 62

Downloads

Authors

  • Najibullah Faiez Takhar University, Afghanistan

Published

2022-12-14

How to Cite

Faiez, Najibullah. 2022. “Judicial Oversight on Administrative Decisions in Afghanistan”. Administrative and Environmental Law Review 3 (2):135-50. https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v3i2.2775.

Issue

Section

Articles