THE CHANGES OF RUSSIAN EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE IN THE BLACK SEA AFTER THE ANEXATION OF CRIMEA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v4no2.2079

Abstract

Russia is a country that has a very large area and a lot of resources. February 2014 Russia carried out an act of annexation on the Crimean Peninsula. The consequences of the annexation of Crimea by Russia go beyond concerns over land sovereignty and deep into the waters of the Black Sea especially those associated with the Sea of the Exclusive Economic Zone. In the Exclusive Economic Zone, the coastal state has the right to regulate all exploration activities as well as exploitation of natural resources at sea level, on the seabed and also under the sea, as well as to conduct research on biological resources and other marine resources. Problems arise, namely: how the changes in the marine area of Russia's exclusive economic zone in the Black Sea after the annexation of Crimea and how the impact of the increasing sea area of Russia's exclusive economic zone in the black sea due to Crimea's annexation of Ukraine. This study aims to look at changes in the marine area of Russia's exclusive economic zone in the Black Sea after the annexation of Crimea and its impact on Ukraine. The research method used in this research is a qualitative normative research method in research of library materials which is basic data which in science is classified as secondary data which relies on data collection tools in the form of library studies or document studies on the problem of changes in the sea zone. Russia's exclusive economy on the Black sea following the annexation of Crimea. The results show that a very significant change in Russia's sea area in the Black Sea will certainly provide enormous benefits in the utilization of this new exclusive economic zone for Russia. The International Court of Justice can resolve conflicts between Ukraine and Russia. UNCLOS 1982 can be used as a guide in solving problems considering Russia and Ukraine. For Ukraine, economic needs in the economic field such as fisheries, mineral needs, sea traffic flow, the needs of the Ukrainian army, and trade routes were the effects of Russia's annexation of Crimea.

Keywords:

Annexation, Crimea, Sea, ZEE,

References

Baillie, R. “EUROPE SEEKS SECURE ENERGY SUPPLY AS RUSSIA TURNS UP HEAT”, Jane’s Intelligence Review 18, no. 12, 2006: 1-10.

Blockmans, Steven. “CRIMEA AND THE QUEST FOR ENERGY AND MILITARY HEGEMONY IN THE BLACK SEA REGION: GOVERNANCE GAP IN A CONTESTED GEOSTRATEGIC ZONE”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 15, no. 2, 2015: 179-189, DOI: 10.1080/14683857.2015.1060016

Borshchik, Natalia D., et.al. "CUSTOMS, BORDER AND QUARANTINE CONTROL BODIES OF THE CRIMEAN PENINSULA IN THE LATE 18TH – FIRST HALF OF THE 19TH CENTURY: REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND PERSONNEL STRUCTURE", Bylye Gody 54, no. 4, 2019: 1506-1513, DOI: 10.13187/bg.2019.4.1506.

Bosbotinis, James. “ASSESSING THE STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE OF THE BLACK SEA REGION”. Romanian J. Eur. Aff 10, 2010: 1-22.

Friedman, Shani. “THE CONCEPT OF ENTITLEMENT TO AN EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE AS REFLECTED IN INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL DECISIONS”, Israel Law Review 53, no. 1, 2020: 101-133, DOI: 10.1017/S0021223719000190.

Gudev, Pavel. "AZOV AND BLACK SEA REGION NEW POLITICAL AND LEGAL REALITIES", World Economy and International Relations 62, no. 11, 2018: 91-102, DOI: 10.20542 / 0131-2227-2018-62-11-87-98.

Kartini, Indriana. “ANEKSASI RUSIA DI KRIMEA DAN KONSEKUENSINYA BAGI UKRAINA”, Jurnal Penelitian Politik 11, no. 2, 2016: 27-41, DOI: 10.14203/jpp.v11i2.199.

Kormych, Borys., et.al. "THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION OF TERRITORIAL SEAS: UKRAINIAN CASE", Int Environ Agreements 49, no. 6, 2020: 577-595, DOI: 10.1007/s10784-020-09473-9.

Kormych, Borys., et.al. “THE UKRAINIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION OF TERRITORIAL SEAS: A EUROPEAN EXAMPLE”, European Energy and Environmental Law Review 29, no. 2, 2020: 26-38.

Mankoff, Jeffrey. “RUSSIA’S LATEST LAND GRAB: HOW PUTIN WON CRIMEA AND LOST UKRAINE”, Foreign Affairs 93, no. 3, 2014: 60-68.

Schneider, Mark B. "RUSSIA CHEATS", Air Force Magazine 99, no. 7, 2016: 38-42.

Schofield, Clive. “PARTING THE WAVES: CLAIMS TO MARITIME JURISDICTION AND THE DIVISION OF OCEAN SPACE”, Penn St. JL & International Affair 1, no. 1, 2012: 40-58.

Thomas, Merilin. “TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TENTANG PENETAPAN BATAS WILAYAH LAUT NEGARA (STUDI KASUS SENGKETA WILAYAH AMBALAT ANTARA INDONESIA DENGAN MALAYSIA)”, Lex et Societatis 1, no. 2, 2013: 160-168.

Triantaphyllou, Dimitrios. “THE ‘SECURITY PARADOXES’ OF THE BLACK SEA REGION”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 9, no. 3, 2009: 225-241, DOI: 10.1080/14683850902934143

Trifanov, Denis. “RUSSIA BOOSTS COUNTERINSURGENCY EFFORTS IN NORTH CAUCASUS”, Jane’s Intelligence Review 18, no. 2, 2006: 1-98.

Yusuf, Adijaya. "PENERAPAN PRINSIP PENDUDUKAN EFEKTIF DALAM PEROLEHAN WILAYAH: PERSPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL". Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 33, no. 1, 2017: 1-15.

Adolf, Huala. Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2004.

Goldrick, James. Grey Zone Operations and the Maritime Domain, Australian Strategic Policy. Australia: Barton ACT, 2018.

Marzuki, Peter M. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2015.

Moleong, Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2011.

Olliver, Madeline. An International Legal Analysis of Russia’s Intervention in Ukraine. Disertasi. New Zaeland: Bachelor of Law, the University of Otago, 2015.

Shaw, Malcolm N. International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Soekanto, Soerjono., Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004.

Tahar, Abdul Muthalib. Zona-zona Maritim Berdasarkan Konvensi Hukum Laut 1982 dan Perkembangan Hukum Laut Indonesia. Lampung: Penerbit Universitas Lampung, 2011.

Thontowi, Jawahir. Hukum Internasional Kontemporer. Bandung : Refika Aditama, 2006.

United Nation. Buletin Law of the Sea. Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea Office of Legal Affairs. New York: United Nation, 2004.

https://jamestown.org/program/russian-navy-preparing-to-bottle-up-ukrainian-shipping-in-sea-of-azov, diakses pada tanggal 22 Juli 2020 pukul 14.42 WIB.

https://www.britannica.com/place/Black-Sea/Economic-aspects. Accessed 22 Juli 2020, diakses pada tanggal 16 September 2020 pukul 12.59 WIB.

https://www.britannica.com/place/Russia, diakses pada tanggal 16 September 2020 pukul 12.59 WIB.

https://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2018/08/285578.htm, diakses pada tanggal 22 Juli 2020, pukul 15.31 WIB.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Total Abstract Views: 445 | Total Downloads: 289

Authors

  • Bertoni Dean Simamora Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro,
  • Joko Setiyono Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro,

Published

2020-09-29

How to Cite

Simamora, Bertoni Dean, and Joko Setiyono. 2020. “THE CHANGES OF RUSSIAN EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE IN THE BLACK SEA AFTER THE ANEXATION OF CRIMEA”. Cepalo 4 (2):81-94. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v4no2.2079.

Issue

Section

Articles