PROTECTION OF WITNESSES AND VICTIMS OF CERTAIN CASES BASED ON EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW PERSPECTIVE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v5no1.2109

Abstract

Protection of witnesses and victims of criminal acts can cause particular problems in implementing witness and victim protection. The author finds several problems. The first problem is that protection for witnesses and victims of criminal acts in some instances results in witnesses and victims in other crimes being unable to apply for rights. The second problem is that the protection of witnesses and victims of criminal acts in some instances closes the opportunity for cases outside of criminal cases such as civil cases, state administration cases to obtain similar rights. The third problem is the conflict of norms between Article 5 paragraph (2) Law No. 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law No. 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims with Article 224 paragraph (1) Criminal Code. In this context, the writer uses the relevant principle as a tool of analysis, namely the principle of equality before the law.

The author is of the view that the protection of witnesses and victims of criminal acts in some instances is not under the principle of equality before the law, so the author has the following ideas: (1) Editors provide must change rights to witnesses and victims of crime in some instances in the protection of witnesses and victims (2) Protection of witnesses and victims should not only be for criminal cases but must also cover must always maintain cases outside of criminal cases, (3) Fulfillment of obligations and granting rights must always be maintained in balance (4) Renewal of protection for witnesses and victims must be contained in statutory regulation.

Keywords:

Protection, Witnesses and Victims, Equality before the Law

References

Afifah, Wiwik., Lessy, Gusrin. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK SEBAGAI SAKSI DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK”, DIH: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 10, no. 20, 2014: 63-75, DOI: 10.30996/dih.v10i20.358.

Komariah, Mamay. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM SAKSI DAN KORBAN OLEH LEMBAGA PERLINDUNGAN SAKSI DAN KORBAN (LPSK)”, Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisia 3, no 2, 2015: 229-245, DOI: 10.25157/jigj.v3i2.421.

Lugianto, Adil. “REKONSTRUKSI PERLINDUNGAN HAK-HAK KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA”, Masalah-Masalah Hukum 43, no. 4, 2014: 553-560, DOI: 10.14710/mmh.43.4.2014.553-559.

Mareta, Josefhin. “ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN PERLINDUNGAN SAKSI DAN KORBAN (POLICY ANALYSIS OF WITNESS AND VICTIM PROTECTION)”, Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 10, no. 1, 2016: 105-115, DOI: 10.30641/kebijakan.2016.V10.105-115.

P. Simanjorang, Bill Clinton. “REALISASI LEMBAGA PERLINDUNGAN SAKSI DAN KORBAN (LPSK) DALAM MEMBERIKAN PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP SAKSI DAN KORBAN DI DAERAH”, Jurnal Universitas Atmajaya Yogyakarta, 2014: 1-14

Pudjirahayu, Esmi Warassih., et.al, “WEWENANG KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DALAM PENGHENTIAN PENYIDIKAN DAN PENUNTUTAN PERSPEKTIF INDEPENDENSI”, University of Bengkulu Law Journal (UBELAJ) 5, no. 1, 2020: 35-46, DOI: 10.33369/ubelaj.5.1.35-46.

Rahayu, Derita Prapti. “BUDAYA HUKUM PANCASILA DALAM HUKUM PERTAMBANGAN RAKYAT SEBAGAI BAGIAN PEMBANGUNAN SISTEM HUKUM NASIONAL”, Kanun Journal of Law 16, no. 1, 2014: 85-102

Rahayu, Derita Prapti. “DELIK IZIN LINGKUNGAN YANG TERABAIKAN”, Jurnal Yudisial 8, no. 2, 2015: 209-228, DOI: 10.29123/jy.v8i2.53

Rahayu, Derita Prapti. “REKONSTRUKSI PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DALAM PERIZINAN PERTAMBANGAN RAKYAT BERBASIS NILAI KEARIFAN LOKAL (Studi Kasus Izin Pertambangan Rakyat di Kabupaten Belitung Timur)”, Prosiding Seminar Hukum dan Publikasi Nasional (Serumpun) 1, no. 1, 2019: 446-457.

Sabrina, Nahdiya. “PERLINDUNGAN DAN PEMENUHAN HAK KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA”, Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 7, no. 2, 2016: 229-237.

Semendawai, Abdul Haris. “Hak-Hak Korban Pelanggaran HAM Yang Berat (Tinjauan Hukum Internasional dan Nasional)”, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 16, no. 2, 2009: 253-267, DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss2.art6.

Sulaiman., Rahayu, Derita Prapti. “PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA DALAM KONSEP HUKUM PROGRESIF”, Jurnal Hermeneutika 2, no. 1, 2018: 128-139, 135, DOI: 10.33603/hermeneutika.v2i1.1124.

Yokotani. “MEKANISME SELEKSI DEWAN PENGAWAS KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DALAM PERSPEKTIF CITA HUKUM PANCASILA”, Progresif Jurnal Hukum 13, no. 2, 2019: 115-133, DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v13i2.1452.

Yulia, Rena. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KORBAN KEJAHATAN PADA PROSES PENYELIDIKAN DAN PENYIDIKAN DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA”, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 49, no. 3, 2019: 661-670, DOI: 10.21143/jhp.vol49.no3.2193

Ernita Larasati, “ANALISIS PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP SAKSI DALAM PEMERIKSAAN PERKARA PIDANA (Studi di Wilayah Hukum Bandar Lampung)”, Thesis Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung, .2017.

Mulyadi, Lilik. Hukum Acara Pidana Normatif, Toritis, Praktik Dan Permasalahannya. Bandung: Alumni, 2017.

Rahayu, Prapti Derita. Metode Penelitian Hukum, Yogyakarta: Thafa Media, 2020.

Sofyan, Andi, Hukum Acara Pidana Suatu Pengantar, Jakarta: Fajar Interpratama Mandiri, 2014.

Takariawan, Agus. Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, Bandung: Pustaka Reka Cipta, 2016.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Total Abstract Views: 6 | Total Downloads: 5

Downloads

Authors

  • Ndaru Satrio Universitas Bangka Belitung, Indonesia
  • Faisal Faisal Universitas Bangka Belitung, Indonesia

Published

2021-04-15

Issue

Section

Artikel

Author Biography

Ndaru Satrio, Universitas Bangka Belitung

Saya saat ini menjadi dosen di FH Universitas Bangka Belitung. Saat ini saya masih CPNS Dosen Asisten Ahli.