IMPLEMENTATION DIVERSION IN SETTLEMENT CASES FOR CHILDREN PERPETRATORS CRIME THEFT AT TANJUNG KARANG DISTRICT COURT

Daffa Ladro Kusworo; Maghfira Nur Khaliza  Fauzi

doi:10.25041/cepalo.v7no1.2855

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v7no1.2855

Abstract

The implementation of Diversion solves children's cases with peace efforts outside the judicial process and always provides legal protection to children to fulfill their future interests. In the data obtained that the implementation of Diversion in the settlement of cases of child perpetrators of the crime of theft in 2022, the Tanjung Karang District Court has succeeded in carrying out diversion cases in 3 cases out of 11 cases theft. However, there was a failure in carrying out Diversion because only one of them was successfully handled by Diversion, indicating that obstacles were found that affected the success of the Diversion. This study uses normative Law accompanied by legal rules that apply in society and literature studies in the form of books, journals, etc. The analytical method that will be used for this normative legal research is to use qualitative analysis methods. The data from this qualitative analysis are obtained from various sources in qualitative research; data analysis is more focused during the process in the field and data collection. It can be concluded that obstacles affect the success of Diversion at the Tanjung Karang District Court because the victim does not agree to the diversion agreement. There are objections to the compensation fee that the perpetrator must make to the victim and different understandings of law enforcement officials (APH) to implement Diversion successfully.

Keywords:

Child, Diversion, Theft

References

Ali, Zainuddin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Edited by Leni Wulandari. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021.

Arliman, Laurensius. Komnas HAM Dan Perlindungan Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana. Sleman: Deepublish, 2015.

Basri, Basri, Heni Hendrawati, and Yulia Kurniaty. “Kajian Yuridis Unsur Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan,” 2015.

Dahlan Sinaga SH, M H. Mengkritisi Gagasan Perluasan Berlakunya Diversi: Seri Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Nusamedia, 2021.

Djamli, Nasir. Anak Bukan Untuk Dihukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.

Salam, Faisal. Hukum Acara Peradilan Anak Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Mandar Maju, 2005.

Sutatiek, Sri. Hukum Pidana Anak Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo, 2015.

Wangga, Maria Silvya E. Hukum Acara Pengadilan Anak: Dalam Teori Dan Praktik. Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti, 2016.

Afifah, Wiwik. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak Konflik Hukum.” DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 19 (2014).

Aprilianda, Nurini. “Implikasi Yuridis Dari Kententuan Diversi Dalam Instrumen Internasional Anak Dalam Hukum Anak Di Indonesia.” Arena Hukum 5, no. 1 (2012).

Darman, Ari, Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku, and Made Sugi Hartono. “Penolakan Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Restorative Justice Terhadap Dugaan Modus Operandi Tindak Pidana Pencurian (Studi Kasus SK Kejati Sumbar No: B-/L. 3/Es/10/2020 Dan Putusan No. 177/Pid. B/2020/PN PNN).” Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia 5, no. 1 (2022).

Ernis, Yul. “Diversi Dan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Anak Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 10, no. 2 (2016).

Fitri, Mardi. “Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Perkembangan Moral Pada Anak Usia Dini.” Al-Athfaal: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini 3, no. 1 (2020): 1–15.

Harahap, Rizki Handayani, Fatahuddin Aziz Siregar, and Ikhwanuddin Harahap. “Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Kejahatan Pencurian Berulang.” Jurnal El Thawalib 1, no. 2 (2020): 1–15.

Hartono. “Konsep Pembinaan Anak Dalam Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak (LPKA) Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia.” Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 11, no. 1 (2019).

Jenawi, Belli. “Kajian Hukum Terhadap Kendala Dalam Perlindungan Hukum Oleh Aparat Penegak Hukum Terhadap Anak Korban Pelecehan Seksual (Ditinjau Dari UU No. 35 Tahun 2014).” Lex Crimen 6, no. 8 (2017).

Kaimuddin, Arfan. “Perlindungan Hukum Korban Tindak Pidana Pencurian Ringan Pada Proses Diversi Tingkat Penyidikan.” Arena Hukum 8, no. 2 (2016).

Komariah, Komariah, and Tinuk Dwi Cahyani. “Efektifitas Konsep Diversi Dalam Proses Peradilan Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Menurut UU No. 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.” Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 24, no. 2 (2016).

Rahmadani, Muhammad Wiwin. “Penerapan Diversi Pada Tahap Penuntutan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.” Badamai Law Journal 2, no. 2 (2020).

Saputra, Rian Prayudi. “Perkembangan Tindak Pidana Pencurian Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Pahlawan 2, no. 2 (2019).

Sinaga, Andri, and Ainal Hadi. “Tindak Pidana Pencurian.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Pidana 2, no. 1 (2018).

Tarigan, Fetri A R. “Upaya Diversi Bagi Anak Dalam Proses Peradilan.” Lex Crimen 4, no. 5 (2015).

Walandouw, Rony A. “Unsur Melawan Hukum Yang Subjektif Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencurian Pasal 362 KUHP.” Lex Crimen 9, no. 3 (2020).

Zuliah, Azmiati. “Urgensi Pelaksanaan Diversi Dan Keadilan Restoratif Pasca Pemberlakukan Undang-Undang No 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.” Warta Dharmawangsa, no. 51 (2017)

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (Lembaran Negara Nomor 153, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 5332)

Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 Tentang Perlindungan Anak (Lembaran Negara Nomor 2014, Tambahan Lembaran Negara No. 5606)

Syahputra, Mohd, and Sukri Harriyus. “Analisa Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Pencurian Ringan Melalaui Restorative Justice (Studi Kasus Polsek Senapelan Kota Pekanbaru).” Universitas Islam Riau, 2020.

The author would like to thank all parties who have participated in all stages of writing this article. Hopefully, this article entitled " Analytical Study Implementation Diversion in Settlement Cases for Children Perpetrators Crime Theft at Tanjung Karang District Court" will provide benefits for readers and writers and can overcome various immunization problems in the community.