Validity of the Implementing Regulations of Law Number 7 of 2004 concerning Water Resources Post-Constitutional Court Decision Number 85 / Puu-Xi / 2013

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/constitutionale.v1i1.2012

Abstract

The power of law of statutory norms under the law after the reference regulation can be canceled by the Constitutional Court. The validity of the legal strength of implementing regulations from Law Number 7 of 2004 concerning Water Resources can be determined through a higher legal norm above it because a higher norm will lead to a basic norm which becomes the source of the legal norms under it. Likewise with implementing regulations of a law, the validity of which is determined by the legal norms above it as a whole or per article because the legal norms above are sourced and lowered as sources. In accordance with the theory put forward by Adolf Merkel in the theory of legal ranking, which states that a legal norm has two faces, das Doppelte Rechtsanlitz. Adolf revealed that a norm is upward as a source and basis for legal norms underneath. Thus, the validity of the implementing regulations of Law Number 7 of 2004 concerning Water Resources will lose its validity when the source norms have been canceled by the Constitutional Court so that amendments to Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Formation of Laws and Regulations by the DPR and President.

Keywords:

Validity, Constitutional Court Decision

References

Achmad, and , Mulyanto. “Problematika Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (Judicial Review) Pada Mahkamah Agung Dan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 1, 2013: 57–65. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v2i1.11070.

AL. Sentot Sudarwanto. “Dampak Dibatalkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2004 Tentang Sumber Daya Air Terhadap Manajemen Air Untuk Kesejahteraan Masyarakat.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 92, no. 1, 2015. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v92i0.3828.

Ali, Mohammad Mahrus, Meyrinda Rahmawaty Hilipito, and Syukri Asy’ari. “Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Bersifat Konstitusional Bersyarat Serta Memuat Norma Baru.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 3, 2016: 631–62. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk12310.

Arrsa, Ria Casmi. “Indikasi Kriminalisasi Pembela Ham Dalam Sengketa Agraria Kajian Putusan Nomor 250.Pid.B.2013/PN.PLG Dan Nomor 76/PID/2013/PT.PLG.” Jurnal Yudisial 7, no. 1, 2014: 53–69.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2005. Model-Model Pengujian Konstitusional di Berbagai Negara. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press

Faridhi, Adrian. “Penguji Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Tunggal Keniscayaan.” JURNAL MERCATORIA 10, no. 2, 2017: 180–96. https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v10i2.1202.

Habibi, Muhammad. “Independensi Kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Pasca Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.” Cepalo 4, no. 1, 2020: 38–47. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v4no1.1962.

Hans Kelsen. 2007. Teori Hukum Murni: Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif sebagai Ilmu Hukum Empirik-Deskriptif, (The Pure Theorie Of Law),Jakarta: Bee Media.

Kamala, Izzatin. “Harapan Baru Atas Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Air Terkait Putusan MK Nomor 85/PUU-XI/2013.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 3, 2016: 422–46. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1231.

Kasim, Helmi. “Penegasan Peran Negara Dalam Pemenuhan Hak Warga Negara Atas Air.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 2, 2016: 353–72. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1228.

Nalle, Victor Imanuel Williamson. “Hak Menguasai Negara Atas Mineral Dan Batubara Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Minerba.” JurnaI Konstitusi 9, no. 3, 2012: 480. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk%x.

Nurhidayatuloh, N. “Dilema Pengujian Undang-Undang Ratifikasi Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Konteks Ketetanegaraan Ri.” Jurnal Konstitusi 9, no. 1, 2012: 116–25. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk.

Prang, Amrizal J. “Implikasi Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 13, no. 1, 2011: 77–94. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v13i1.6233.

Puspitasari, Santi, Adi Cifriadi, Krisnawati Krisnawati, and Tun Tedja Irawadi. “Reaksi Transfer Hidrogenasi Minyak Jarak Kastor Serta Aplikasinya Sebagai Bahan Pelunak Kompon Karet.” Majalah Kulit, Karet, Dan Plastik 32, no. 2, 2016: 85–98. https://doi.org/10.20543/mkkp.v32i2.1361.

Rachman, Irfan Nur. “Politik Hukum Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam Menurut Pasal 33 UUD 1945.” Jurnal Konstitusi 13, no. 1, 2016: 191–212. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1319.

SAGAMA, SUWARDI. “Reformulasi Hierarki Peraturan Pada Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi 1, no. 2, 2018: 185–97. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v1i2.1967.

Siahan, Maruarar, 2011. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Simamora, Janpatar. “Legal Dynamics And Implementation Problems Of Judicial Review Authority In The Supreme Court.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 16, no. 2, 2016: 179–86. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2016.16.2.490.

Subagyono, Bambang Sugeng Ariadi, Johan Wahyudi, and Razky Akbar. “Kajian Penerapan Asas Ultra Petita Pada.” Yuridika 29, no. 1, 2014: 100–112. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v29i1.360.

Syahuri, Taufiqurrohman. 2004. Hukum Konstitusi. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia

Syukri Asy’ari, Meyrinda Rahmawati Hilipto, Mohammad Mahrus Ali, “Model dan

Zainuddin, Sulthan, Endriatmo Soetarto, Soeryo Adiwibowo, and Nurmala K Panjaitan. “Kontestasi Kekuasaan Dalam Pengelolaan SDA.” Jurnal Academica Fisip Untad 2, no. 2, 2010: 455–68.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Total Abstract Views: 128 | Total Downloads: 59

Downloads

Authors

  • Muhammad Fauzul Adzim Universitas Lampung, Indonesia

Published

2020-09-25

Issue

Section

Articles