The Nexus Between Environmental, Climate Change, and Social Impact Assessments in Upholding Environmental Rights in South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/constitutionale.v6i2.4445Abstract
Section 24 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 108 of 1996, guarantees environmental rights and promotes sustainable development, yet these rights are not absolute and environmental harm and related human rights violations persist. This article examines the role and interrelationship of environmental impact assessments, climate change impact assessments, and social impact assessments in addressing regulatory gaps and advancing sustainable development. Using a doctrinal and contextual legal approach, it analyses primary sources, including the Constitution, the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 and its regulations, and key case law, notably Earthlife Africa Johannesburg v Minister of Environmental Affairs and Others and Trustees of the Groundwork Trust v Acting Director-General: Department of Water and Sanitation, together with relevant secondary literature. It argues that these three forms of impact assessment operate in a triangulated and interdependent manner, applied at different stages of project development, and collectively contribute to the realisation of section 24 for the benefit of present and future generations.
Keywords:
Climate Change Impact Assessments, Environmental Impact Assessment, Environmental rights, Social Impact Assessments, Sustainable developmentReferences
Aucamp, I. and Lombard, A. “Can social impact assessment contribute to social development outcomes in an emerging economy?” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 36 (2018): 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2017.1390872.
Ariscu Team, “South Africas new climate guideline signals a major shift from environmental approvals”, 14 November 2025, available online: https://ariscu.com/south-africas-new-climate-guideline-signals-a-major-shift-for-environmental-approvals/#:~:text=On%2024%20October%202025%2C%20the,frameworks%2C%20and%20GHG%20reporting%20systems.
Bowd, R., Quinn, R.W., and Kotze, D.C., “Toward an analytical framework for understanding complex social-ecological systems when conducting environmental impact assessments in South Africa.” Ecology and Society 20(1) (2015): 41. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07057-200141.
BP Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd v MEC for Agriculture, Conservation, Environment and Land Affairs 2004 (5) SA 124 (W).
Centre for Environmental Rights “Winning SA’s first climate change court case: What it means for affected communities, industry, government and the people of South Africa.” 05 April 2017 available online: https://lifeaftercoal.org.za/media/news/winning-sas-first-climate-change-court-case-what-it-means-for-affected-communities-industry-government-and-the-people-of-south-africa.
Cilliers, D. P., van Staden, I. Roos, C., Alberts, R. C. and Retief, F. P. “The perceived benefits of EIA for government: a regulator perspective.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 38(5) (2020): 358-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2020.1734403.
Chidzungu, T., and Wafer, A., “Can Social Impact Assessments (SIAs) be a sustainable strategy to address the skills development gap and community sustainability challenges in Just Energy Transition (JET) policy decision-making? Evidence from the South African mining communities of Kriel and Caroling in Mpumalanga.” South African Geographical Journal 106 (2023):89-108. https://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/03736245.2023.2214537.
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 108 of 1996.
Cramer, W., Guiot, J., Fader, M., Garrabou, J., Gattuso, J. P., Iglesias, A., and Xoplaki, E. “Climate change and interconnected risks to sustainable development in the Mediterranean.” Nature Climate Change, 8(11) (2018): 972–980. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0299-2.
Christiansen, E. C. “Empowerment, Fairness, Integration: South African Answers to the Question of Constitutional Environmental Rights.” Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 32(215) (2013): 216-242.
Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT). “Integrated Environmental Management Information Series: Socio-Economic Impact Assessment.” Available online https://www.dffe.gov.za/sites/default/files/docs/series22_socioeconmic_impact_assessment.pdf.
Department of Health. “Management of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) of Proposed Development Activities.” Available online https://www.health.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Manual-EIA-2017-compressed.pdf.
Donald, M. E. Advancing the constitutional goal of social justice through a teleological interpretation of key concepts in the environmental rights in section 24. LLM-thesis, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, 2014.
Du Plessis, A. “The promise of 'well-being' in Section 24 of the Constitution of South Africa.” South African Journal of Human Rights, 34(2) (2018): 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2018.1475116.
Earthlife Africa Johannesburg v Minister of Environmental Affairs and Others (2017) ZAGPPHC 58, High Court.
Feris, L. “Constitutional Environmental Rights: An Un-Utilised Resource.” South African Journal of Human Rights, (2008): 29-49.
Feris, L.A., “The socio-economic nature of section 24(b) of the Constitution – some thoughts on HTF Developers (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism: case note.” SA Public Law 23(2008): 194-207.
Hassan, A. S. “Coal mining and environmental sustainability in South Africa: Do institutions matter?” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(8) (2022), 20431 – 20449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23585-6.
HTF Developers (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism and Others (2006) ZAGPHC 132.
Humbly, T-L. “The Thabametsi Case: Case No 65662/16 Earthlife Africa Johannesburg v Minister of Environmental Affairs.” Journal of Environmental Law (1464-374X), 30(1) (2018): 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqy007.
IAIA (International Association for Impact Assessment). “Principles of Environmental Impact Assessment: Best Practice.” Available online https://www.eianz.org/document/item/2744.
Jasonoff, S. “The Dilemma of Environmental Democracy.” Issues in Science and Technology 13(1) (1996): 63–71.
Kidd, M. “Deadly Air and the Misinterpretation of the Section 24 Environmental Right: The Groundwork Trust Case.” Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal (2023): 1-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a15833.
Kidd, M. “Greening the Judiciary.” Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal (2006): 72-86.
Klaasen, A., “Constitutional interpretation in the so-called ‘hard cases’: Revisiting S v Makwanyane” De Jure (2017):1-17. https://doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2017/v50n1a1.
Kotzé, L. J. “The Judiciary, the Environmental Right and the Quest for Sustainability in South Africa: A Critical Reflection.” Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 16 (2007): 298-311.
Kruger, L., and Sandham, L.A., “Social impact assessment: practitioner perspectives of the neglected status in South African SIA.” South African Geographical Journal 100 (2018):394-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2018.1503090.
Kruger, L., Sandham, L. A., van Niekerk, D., Esteves, A. M, Franks, D., and Vanclay, F. “Social Impact Assessment: the state of the art.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1) (2012): 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.660356.
Lambrecht, M., Sowman, M., and Day, K. “South Africa’s EIA Screening Tool: A preliminary study of how users perceive its accuracy and utility.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 41(2) (2023): 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2022.2139863.
Local Government: Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000.
Local Government: Municipal Structures Act 117 of 1998.
Maphanga, T, Shale, K, Gqomfa, B and Zungu, V.M. “The State of Public Participation in the EIA Process and Its Role in South Africa: A Case of Xolobeni.” South African Geographical Journal, 105 (3) (2022): 277–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2022.2087726.
Mayembe, R., Simpson, N.P., Rumble, O., and Norton. M., “Integrating climate change in Environmental Impact Assessment: A review of requirements across 19 EIA regimes.” Science of the Total Environment 869(2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161850.
Mvelase, L.M., Ferrer, S.R.S., and Mustapha, N., “The socio-economic impact assessment of biofuels production in South Africa: A rapid structured review of literature.” Cogent Engineering 10(1) (2023): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2023.2192328.
Mondini, G. “Sustainability Assessment: from Brundtland Report to Sustainable Development Goals.” Journal Valori e Valutazioni, 23 (2019): 129-137.
Murcott, M “Transformative Environmental Constitutionalism” Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, 2023.
National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998.
National Water Act 36 of 1998.
O’Gorman, E., Hochstrassed, T., and Renou-Wilson, F., “Climate impact assessment procedures: time to look beyond compliance” Impact assessment and Project Appraisal 42(6) (2024): 553-564. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2024.2432185.
Pule, K., “The obligation on environmental authorities to consider socio-economic factors in EIAs: A critical examination of s24 of NEMA.” LLM-thesis, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Kwazulu-Natal, 2014.
Pring, G., and Noé, S. Y. “The Emerging International Law of Public Participation Affecting Global Mining, Energy and Resource Development.” In D. M. Zillman, A. Lucas, and G. Pring (Eds.), Human Rights in Natural Resource Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2000.
Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000.
Rayten Engineering solutions, “M2 Environmental Connections (Pty) Ltd Climate Change Impact Assessment Tendele Mining (Pty) Ltd – Somkhele Mine Extension Project” 28 March 2024 available online: https://www.wsp.com/-/media/service/south-africa/2024-documents/tendele/app-13_-climate-change-impact-assessment_tendele_draft-2.pdf.
Theil, S. “The Problem with the Normative Content of Section 24 of the Constitution of South Africa.” Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 37 (2019): 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2019.1643669.
Trustees of the Groundwork Trust v Acting Director-General: Department of Water and Sanitation and Another (WT06/11/2015) [2020] ZAWT 1.
United Nations. “Sustainable Development Goals.” Available online https://sdgs.un.org/goals.
Vanclay, F. “International Principles for Social Impact Assessment.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(1) (2003): 5-11. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154603781766491.
Vanclay, F. “Changes in the impact assessment family 2003-2014: Implications for considering achievements, gaps and future direction.” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 17(1) (2015): 1550003-1 – 1550003-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1464333215500039.
Vanclay, F. “Principles to gain a social licence to operate for green initiatives and biodiversity projects.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 29 (2017): 48-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.11.003.
Vanclay, F. “Reflections on Social Impact Assessment in the 21st century.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 38(2) (2020): 126-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1685807.
Vinti, C. “Hydrocolonisation in the Lesotho Highlands Water Project Treaty: Legitimate Treaty or Murky Waters?” Doctor of Philosophy, Wits University, Johannesburg, 2022.
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) in 1987.
Downloads
Total Abstract Views: 15 |
Total Downloads: 13
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2025 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
