Law Enforcement towards Arrest by Hand Operation in the Prosecutor’s Office of Lampung Province

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio.v2i1.2256

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out the results of law enforcement activities between the North Lampung District Attorney and the Kepahiang District Attorney and to find out whether the North Lampung District Attorney and the Kepahiang District Prosecutor's Office have fulfilled the principle of legal certainty in the activity of catching the hands of suspected criminal acts committed by non-governmental organizations. This research method uses normative and empirical approaches, namely normative research, which examines laws and theories. The empirical approach is made by looking at the facts and studying the law in the field. The results of the research on arrest activities carried out by the North Lampung District Prosecutor's Office, and the Kepahiang District Prosecutors' Office were carried out based on an order from the respective head of the state prosecutor's office, both the intelligence team and the joint team based on the order of the head of the state prosecutor's office. The difference between the results of law enforcement on the activities of the Attorney General's Office for Handling the arrest of the hands of the North Lampung Police was because the alleged criminal act was a general crime based on the money handed over to the victim, in contrast to the Kepahiang Prosecutor's Office which stated that the criminal act of corruption was due to the villages’ financial (Dana Desa) losses where there are proven state losses. The North Lampung District Prosecutor's Office and the Kepahiang District Prosecutor's Office have legal certainty in the activity of catching hands against non-governmental organizations who are suspected of committing a criminal act. However, the results of these activities are different.

Keywords:

Law, Enforcement, Hand, Operation

References

Nawawi, Barda Arief, Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti. 1998.

Abdul Tayib. “Implementasi Recall Oleh Partai Politik Terhadap Anggota Dprd Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 Tentang MPR,DPR,DPD,DPRD.” Unizar Law Review. Accessed January 28, 2021. http://e journal.unizar.ac.id/index.php/ulr/article/view/35/32.

Aneesha, Oleh :, and Nadia Safira. “PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU YANG TERJARING OPERASI TANGKAP TANGAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI.” Dinamika: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum. Vol. 25, March 2, 2019. http://harianhaluan.com/news/detail/61394/i.

Asyari, Fatimah. “OPERASI TANGKAP TANGAN (OTT) DI PUSAT DAN DAERAH UNTUK MERAIH WTP TERKAIT MASALAH PELANGGARAN HUKUM.” LEGALITAS 2, no. 1 (September 12, 2017): 57–66. https://brainly.co.id/tugas/7456639.

Ditha, Tegar Mawang, Dian Ekawaty Ismail, and Lusiana M Tijow. “Al-Mizan Intelijen Kejaksaan Perspektif Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Dan Ketatanegaraan Islam.” Al-Mizan 16, no. 1 (June 1, 2020): 51–74. https://doi.org/10.30603/am.v16i1.1739.

Faris, Afif Naufal, and Rehnalemken Ginting. “LEGALITAS DAN EFEKTIVITAS OPERASI TANGKAP TANGAN PASCA BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 19 TAHUN 2019.” Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Vol. 9, January 2, 2020. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/recidive/article/view/47394.

Kartika, Pandoe Pramoe, Andrie Dwi Subianto, and I Made Agus Mahendra Iswara. “POLITIK HUKUM KEJAKSAAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA DALAM PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI PADA ERA PEMERINTAHAN PRESIDEN JOKO WIDODO Oleh : Pandoe Pramoe Kartika Andrie Dwi Subianto I Made Agus Mahendra Iswara Kejaksaan Negeri Gresik.” Jurnal Hukum Saraswati (JHS). Vol. 1, September 30, 2019. https://kbbi.web.id/epidemi.

Made Agus Mahendra Iswara, I, and dan Ketut Adi Wirawan. “Peran Kejaksaan Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Desa Di Indonesia.” KERTHA WICAKSANA 14, no. 1 (May 29, 2020): 69–76. https://doi.org/10.22225/kw.14.1.1799.69-76.

Marselly Sealtiel & Hery Firmansyah. “ANALISIS YURIDIS PELAKSANAAN KEWENANGAN JAKSA SEBAGAI PENUNTUT UMUM DAN PENYIDIK DALAM PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 16 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG KEJAKSAAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA.” Jurnal Hukum Adigama 3, no. 2 (January 12, 2021): 311–30. https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/adigama/article/view/10570.

Puluhulawa, Fenty U, and Lusiana M Tijow. “MENGAGAS PENGUATAN KEJAKSAAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA DALAM PENGAMANAN DAN PENGAWALAN PEMBANGUNAN UNTUK MENCEGAH TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Inaugurating The Strengthening Of The Witness Of The Republic Of Indonesia In Security And Supervision Of Development To Prevent Criminal Action.” Borneo Law Review. Vol. 4, December 7, 2020. https://tirto.id/pembubaran-tp4-kejaksaan-menolak-evaluasi-.

Ributu, Adi. “PEMBERLAKUAN KETENTUAN PIDANA TERHADAP PERSONEL INTELIJEN NEGARA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 17 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG INTELIJEN NEGARA.” LEX CRIMEN. Vol. 8, October 25, 2019. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/26104.

Rinjani, Diliya Mariam. “EFEKTIVITAS PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI SECARA MASSAL ANGGOTA LEGISLATIF DAERAH.” Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 19, no. 2 (October 31, 2020): 69–78. https://doi.org/10.32816/paramarta.v19i2.87.

Simanjuntak, Juristoffel. “KAJIAN YURIDIS PEMBERIAN BANTUAN HUKUM JAKSA PENGACARA NEGARA DALAM PERKARA PERDATA DAN TATA USAHA NEGARA (TUN).” LEX ADMINISTRATUM. Vol. 6, July 19, 2018. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/administratum/article/view/20347.

Simatupang, Taufik H . “LEGALITAS SUBJEK HUKUM YAYASAN SEBAGAI BADAN HUKUM (Kedudukan Yayasan Yang Terbentuk Sebelum Lahirnya UU 28 Tahun 2004 Tentang Perubahan UU Nomor 16 Tahun 2001 Tentang Yayasan) THE LEGALITY OF THE INSTITUTION LEGAL SUBJECT AS CORPORATION (The Standing of Foundation Established before the Inception of the Act Number 28 of 2004 on Amendement of the Act Number 16 of 2001 on Foundation).” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum. Vol. 7, February 13, 2017. https://doi.org/10.30641/KEBIJAKAN.2013.V7.`1-12.

Surya, Jurnal, and Kencana Dua. “KEWENANGAN KEJAKSAAN DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 16 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG KEJAKSAAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA.” Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua : Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan. Vol. 4, February 23, 2017. https://doi.org/10.32493/SKD.V4I2.Y2017.1068.

Taufiqurrahman, Muhammad. “PERAN JAKSA AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA TERHADAP PEMBENTUKAN DAN PELAKSANAAN TUGAS TIM PENGAWALAN, PEMERINTAH DAN PEMBAGUNAN DAERAH.” JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana 1, no. 2 (July 9, 2019): 127. https://doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v1i2.226.

Law No. 16 of 2004 concerning the RI Attorney General's Office.

Law No. 17 of 2011 concerning State Intelligence.

Kotabumi Court Judgment No. 178/Pid.B/2018/PN.Kbu.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Total Abstract Views: 0 | Total Downloads: 1

Downloads

Authors

  • Median Suwardi Kejaksaan Negeri Pringsewu, Indonesia

Published

2021-05-03

Issue

Section

Articles