Law Enforcement towards Money Laundering Prepertrators Reviewed From the Presumption of Innocence

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio.v2i1.2258

Abstract

Law enforcement against perpetrators of money laundering crimes has recently become a separate polemic for many law enforcers who have problems, especially about the confiscation of assets suspected of being the result of money laundering, not guided by the presumption of innocence. This writing problem is how law enforcement is against money laundering perpetrators based on the presumption of innocence and how law enforcers should confiscate assets resulting from money laundering based on the presumption of innocence. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan Yuridis Normatif dan Empiris. Normative research is carried out on theoretical matters in legal principles, while the empirical approach is carried out to study the law that occurs in the field. The results showed that law enforcement against money laundering perpetrators who have money laundering proceeds based on the presumption of innocence is carried out by law enforcement through confiscation. The confiscation process does not violate the principle of presumption of innocence because this is a security measure so that the suspected items do not move and transfer to a third party until the trial process is completed and has permanent legal force. Law enforcers should take action in confiscating the assets of money laundering proceeds based on the presumption of innocence must be proportional and prioritize the principles of prudence and prudence as long as it does not violate human rights and is carried out objectively by looking at whether the assets have anything to do with money laundering.

Keywords:

Law, Enforcement, Money, Laundering, Presumption

References

Ali, Ahmad. Meluruskan Jalan Reformasi Hukum. Jakarta: Agatama Press. 2004.

Black, Henry Campbell, Black Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, St. Paul Minn: West Publishing, Co. 1991.

Efendi, Marwan. Tipologi Kejahtan Perbankan Dari Perspektif Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: PT Sumber Ilmu Jaya. 2005.

Husein, Yunus, Bunga Rampai Anti Pencucian Uang, Jakarta: Books Terrace & Library. 2007.

Mochtar, Akil, 2006, Memberantas Korupsi: Efektivitas Sistem Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian dalam Gratifikasi, Jakarta: Q-Communication.2006.

Mulyadi, Lilik, Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Bandung: Alumni. 2004.

Poernomo, Bambang, Orientasi Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti. 2000.

Siahaan, NHT, Money Laundering Dan Kejahatan Perbankan, Jakarta: Jala. 2008.

Amalia, Renata. “Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana ‎Pencucian Uang Menurut Hukum Islam.” Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam 2, no. 2 (December 21, 2016): 385–407. https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2016.2.2.385-407.

Arifin, Ridwan, and Shafa Amalia Choirinnisa. “Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Prinsip Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Corporate Responsibility on Money Laundering Crimes on Indonesian Criminal Law Principle).” JURNAL MERCATORIA 12, no. 1 (June 25, 2019): 43. https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v12i1.2349.

Callista Dea Mira. “Upaya Pembuktian Penuntut Umum Dan Terdakwa Terkait Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Studi Putusan Nomor 1492/2015/PN.Jkt.Utr) .” Verstek 6, no. 3 (2018). https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/verstek/article/view/39176.

Eleanora, Fransiska Novita. “BAHAYA PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOBA SERTA USAHA PENCEGAHAN DAN PENANGGULANGANNYA (Suatu Tinjauan Teoritis).” Jurnal Hukum. Vol. 25, July 13, 2020. http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/jurnalhukum/article/view/203.

Fernandho, Dauglas. “REFORMULASI PEMBUKTIAN TERBALIK DALAM MEMAKSIMALKAN PEMERIKSAAN PERKARA MONEY LAUNDERING DENGAN PREDICATE CRIME TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI.” JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) 19, no. 2 (January 1, 2018): 148–62. https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v19i2.922.

I Ketut Sukawati Lanang Putra Perbawa. “TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG DALAM SISTEM PERBANKAN INDONESIA.” Advokasi 5, no. 1 (2015). http://jurnal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/advokasi/article/view/148.

Ilham, Ridho Ridho, Elwi Danil, and . Yoserwan. “PENERAPAN PRINSIP MENGENALI PENGGUNA JASA OLEH NOTARIS DALAM PENCEGAHAN DAN PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG.” UNES Journal of Swara Justisia 3, no. 4 (January 27, 2020): 390–402. https://doi.org/10.31933/UJSJ.V3I4.126.

Keanu Putra Mentari. “URGENSI ASAS PRESUMPTION OF GUILT DALAM UPAYA PENCEGAHAN DAN PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG.” Kertha Wicara 8, no. 4 (2019). https://ocs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthawicara/article/view/50896.

Krisnamurti, Hana. “KEDUDUKAN SAKSI ANAK DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PIDANA.” Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 15, no. 2 (2016). http://paramarta.web.id/index.php/paramarta/article/view/28.

Nobel Abednego Daely. “PENYITAAN DAN PELELANGAN SAHAM MAYORITAS PERSEROAN DALAM PROSES PERADILAN AKIBAT TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG.” Calyptra 5, no. 1 (2016): 1–22. http://webhosting.ubaya.ac.id/~journalubayaac/index.php/jimus/article/view/2737.

Nuryanto, Ahmad Dwi. “Problem Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Yang Berasal Dari Predicate Crime Perbankan.” BESTUUR 7, no. 1 (August 31, 2019): 54. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v7i1.43437.

Pohan, Sarmadan, and Sarmadan Pohan. “TINJAUAN NORMATIF TENTANG TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG (MONEY LAUNDERING) YANG BERASAL DARI TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI.” JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora 7, no. 2 (April 15, 2020): 275–89. https://doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v7i2.275-289.

Rahim, Arhjayati, and Madinah Mokobombang. “Analisis Penerapan Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi:” Al-Mizan 16, no. 2 (December 31, 2020): 225–48. https://doi.org/10.30603/AM.V16I2.1897.

Yan Patmos. “Penegakan Pasal Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Rangka Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Korupsi.” Law and Policy Transformation 2, no. 2 (2017): 103–24. https://journal.uib.ac.id/index.php/jlpt/article/view/265.

Yuda, Indra Waspada, Hambali Thalib, and Kamri Ahmad. “Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Yang Berasal Dari Tindak Pidana Narkotika.” Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG) 1, no. 2 (July 3, 2020): 225–38. http://pasca-umi.ac.id/index.php/jlg/article/view/108.

The 4th amendment of The 1945 Constitution

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes as amended by Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes

Law Number 8 of 1981 Concerning the Criminal Procedure Code

Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Indonesian Police

Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the RI Prosecutor's Office

Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning the Judicial Power of the Republic of Indonesia

Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Crime of Money Laundering

Government Regulation Number 27 of 1983 Jo Government Regulation Number 58 of 2010 in conjunction with Government Regulation Number 92 of 2015 concerning the implementation of the Criminal Procedure Code

Supreme Court Regulation No.1 of 2013 concerning Procedures for Settlement of Applications for the Handling of Assets in the Crime of Money Laundering

https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20150519104537-12-54136/hadi-poernomo-penyitaan-kpk-tak-sesuai-dugaan-pidana, diakses pada Tanggal 12 Juni 2019

http://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/lt55e06170be878/dasar-hukum-penyitaan-aset-yang-dilakukan-kpk. Diakses Pada Tanggal 19 April 2018

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Total Abstract Views: 16 | Total Downloads: 5

Downloads

Authors

  • Rezza Ardiansyah Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
  • Eddy Rifa’i Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
  • Nikmah Rosidah Universitas Lampung, Indonesia

Published

2021-05-03

Issue

Section

Articles