Reformulation of Institutional Relationship between the People’s Representative Council and the Corruption Eradication Commission
This study aims to reformulate the institutional relationships between legislative bodies and independent state institutions, by taking case studies of the House of Representatives (DPR) and the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). This research was conducted with a normative method using a conceptual and statutory approach. The results showed that the DPR-KPK institutional relationship can be formulated into authority relationship, supervisory relationship and financial relationship. In terms of the authority relationship, the principal-agent approach is used to place DPR as the principal whose duty is to support and provides the resources needed for the KPK as its agent. In this context, the KPK is the recipient of the task whose authority is within the subject of DPR. For the Supervision Relationship, The New Public Management Model (NPM) is used to initiate better supervision through the input and output control mechanism. Input control is carried out by DPR through the legislation and commisoner selection process, while output control is carried out based on accountability reports made by KPK. Thus, DPR is not allowed to intervene while the KPK exercise its duty. In terms of financial relationship, the DPR can regulate funding aspects for KPK through financial legislation. However, this budget politics must be adjusted to the needs and workload in carrying out KPK duties.
Keywords:Reformulation, Institutional, Corruption, Eradication, Commission
Funk, William F., and Richard H. Seamon. Administrative law: examples and explanations. USA: Aspen Publishers, 2009.
Mény, Yves, and Andrew Knapp. Government and Politics in Western Europe: Britain, France, Italy, Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993
Ridwan, H. R. Hukum Administrasi Negara, Bandung: Rajawali Press. Cetakan Kedua. 2003.
Tauda, Gunawan A. Komisi Negara Independen: Eksistensi Independent Agencies sebagai Cabang Kekuasaan baru dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan. Jakarta: Genta Press, 2018.
Quah, Jon ST. "Anti-corruption agencies in four Asian countries: a comparative analysis." In Comparative governance reform in Asia: Democracy, corruption, and government trust. United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 2008.
Braun, Dietmar. “Debate: State Intervention and Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies.” Swiss Political Science Review 8, no. 1 (April 1, 2002): 93–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2002.tb00336.x.
Braun, Dietmar, and David H Guston. “Principal-Agent Theory and Research Policy: An Introduction.” Science and Public Policy 30, no. 5 (October 1, 2003): 302–8. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154303781780290.
Firdaus, Dasep Muhammad. “HAK ANGKET DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT REPUBLIK INDONESIA (DPR RI) TERHADAP KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI (KPK).” Asy-Syari’ah 20, no. 2 (December 21, 2018): 191–202. https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v20i2.3028.
Gilardi, Fabrizio. “Principal-Agent Models Go to Europe: Independent Regulatory Agencies as Ultimate Step of Delegation,” n.d.
Iswandi, Kelik, and Nanik Prasetyoningsih. “Kedudukan State Auxiliary Organ Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan 1, no. 2 (August 24, 2020). https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.1208.
Mei Susanto. “Hak Angket DPR, KPK Dan Pemberantasan Korupsi .” Jurnal Integritas . Accessed February 10, 2021. https://jurnal.kpk.go.id/index.php/integritas/article/view/294.
Nur Wijayanti, Septi. “Hubungan Antara Pusat Dan Daerah Dalam Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014.” Jurnal Media Hukum 23, no. 2 (2017): 186–99. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2016.0079.186-199.
Nurtjahjo, Hendra. “Lembaga, Badan, Dan Komisi Negara Independen (State Auxiliary Agencies) Di Indonesia: Tin.Jauan Hukum Tata Negara.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 35, no. 3 (2017): 275–87. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol35.no3.1518.
Quah, Jon S.T. “Anti-Corruption Agencies in Four Asian Countries: A Comparative Analysis.” Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-1317(08)17006-3.
Ramadani, Rizki. “Lembaga Negara Independen Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Konsep Independent Regulatory Agencies.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 27, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss1.art9.
Ramadani, Rizki, and Andika Prawira Buana. “ The Needed but Unwanted Independent Regulatory Agencies: Questioning Their Legitimacy and Control in Indonesia ,” 674–84. Atlantis Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201209.351.
Rinaldy Bima, Muh, and Rizki Ramadani. “Position of Supervisory Board Organ and Its Implications for the Institutional Corruption Eradication Commission.” LAW REFORM. Vol. 16. PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG, September 27, 2020. https://doi.org/10.14710/LR.V16I2.33770.
Rishan, Idul. “Batas Konstitusional Penggunaan Hak Angket Terhadap Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 3 (2019): 630–54. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1639.
Rizki Ramadani, Moch Andry W W Mamonto. “The Independency of the Corruption Eradication Commission of the Republic of Indonesia (KPK RI) in Indicators of Independent Regulatory Agencies (IRAs) .” Substantive Justice International Journal of Law. Accessed February 10, 2021. https://substantivejustice.id/index.php/sucila/article/view/18.
Tauda, Gunawan A. “Kedudukan Komisi Negara Independen Dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia.” PRANATA HUKUM 6, no. 2 (July 31, 2011). http://jurnal.ubl.ac.id/index.php/PH/article/view/163.
https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20150519104537-12-54136/hadi-poernomo-penyitaan-kpk-tak-sesuai-dugaan-pidana, diakses pada Tanggal 12 Juni 2019
http://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/lt55e06170be878/dasar-hukum-penyitaan-aset-yang-dilakukan-kpk. Diakses Pada Tanggal 19 April 2018
Copyright (c) 2021 Corruptio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.