Coordination in the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK)'s Prosecution Tasks Based on Independence Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio.v2i2.2433Abstract
Coordination of KPK prosecution duties as stated in Article 12A of Law no. 19 of 2019 amending Law No. 30 of 2002 concerning the Commission for the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption, or Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) raises concerns because it creates dependence on other institutions and certainly reduces the independence of the KPK institution. As for some of the problems that need to be known from the existence of this coordination concept, among others: (1) the coordination can be directed towards the form of KPK's subordination to the prosecutor's institution; (2) coordination makes the confidentiality of data held by the KPK not maintained; (3) this coordination is very prone to conflict of interest with the prosecutor's office; (4) this coordination also raises concerns that rotten politics in the resolution of corruption cases may occur. The author uses independence principle analysis. The type of research used in compiling this paper is normative or doctrinal legal research. The research shows that coordination can be done using clear boundaries. First, coordination is still allowed to the extent that it is possible to combine cases that the KPK may not handle. Second, coordination can also be carried out in the event of merging a corruption case that is not the authority of the KPK. Third, the coordination also can be done in the case of the concurrent events. Fourth, the coordination is only related to procedural law.
Keywords:
Coordination, Independence, ProsecutionReferences
Azis, Abdul. “Kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Teori Negara Hukum.” Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan 9, no. 2 (2019): 82. https://doi.org/10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v9i2.2286.
Choi, Jin Wook. “Measuring the Performance of an Anticorruption Agency: The Case of the KPK in Indonesia.” International Review of Public Administration 16, no. 3 (2011): 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2011.10805207.
Dewi, Ni Putu Riska Chandra, Diah Ratna Sari Hariyanto, and Anak Agung Ngurah Wirasila. “Kebijakan Pidana Mati Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Kertha Wicara 10, no. 2 (2021): 174–84.
Fahrurrozi, Fahrurrozi, and Abdul Rahman Salman Paris. “Tinjauan Tentang Sistem Pemidanaan Dalam Perbarengan Tindak Pidana Menurut Kuhp.” Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 9, no. 2 (2019): 124. https://doi.org/10.31764/jmk.v9i2.889.
Falah Parama, Jovial, and Sholahuddin Al-Fatih. “Kajian Yuridis Ambivalensi Pergeseran Independensi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (Kpk) Ke Dalam Rumpun Lembaga Eksekutif.” Journal Komunitas Yustisia Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 1 (2021): 58.
Hamzah, Andi. Korupsi Di Indonesia Masalah Dan Pemecahannya. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1991.
Hikmah, Neny Fathiyatul. “Keberadaan Dewan Pengawas Terhadap Independensi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Perspektif Siyasah Dusturiyah.” Al-Balad: Journal of Constitutional Law 2, no. 2 (2020): 17.
Ismail, and Fakhris Lutfianto Hapsoro. “The Authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission in the Prosecution of Corruption in Indonesia.” Journal of Critical Reviews 7, no. 5 (2020): 177–82. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.05.29.
Isra, Saldi, Yuliandri, Feri Amsari, and Hilaire Tegnan. “Obstruction of Justice in the Effort to Eradicate Corruption in Indonesia.” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 51 (2017): 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2017.07.001.
Ni Putu Gita Loka Chindiyana Dewi, I Nyoman Sujana, and Luh Putu Suryani. “Koordinasi Wewenang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) Dengan Penegak Hukum Lainnya Dalam Melakukan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 2, no. 1 (2021): 122. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.2.1.3056.119-124.
Nugroho, Hibnu. “Efektivitas Fungsi Koordinasi Dan Supervisi Dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 13, no. 3 (September 2013): 392–401.
Pinilih, Sekar Anggun Gading. “Politik Hukum Kedudukan Kpk Sebagai Lembaga Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 8, no. 1 (2020): 23. https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.8.1.15-27.
Prabowo, Ismail. Memerangi Korupsi Dengan Pendekatan Sosiologis. Surabaya: Dharma Wangsa Media Press, 1998.
Rahayu, Derita Prapti. “Delik Izin Lingkungan Yang Terabaikan.” Jurnal Yudisial 8, no. 2 (2015): 217.
Rahayu, Derita Prapti. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Yogyakarta: Thafa Media, 2020.
Schutte, Sofie Arjon. “From Global Paradigms to Grounded Policies: Local Socio-Cognitive Constructions of International Development Policies and Implications for Development Management.” Journal Public Administration and Development 32, no. April (2012): 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.
Setiabudhi, I Ketut Rai. Buku Ajar Hukum Pidana Lanjutan. Denpasar: FH Udayana, 2016.
Setiadi, Wicipto. “Korupsi Di Indonesia (Penyebab, Bahaya, Hambatan, Dan Upaya Pemberantasan, Serta Regulasi”,.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 15, no. 3 (2018): 249–62.
Shandy Utama, Andrew. “Independensi Pengawasan Terhadap Bank Badan Usaha Milik Negara (Bumn) Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional Di Indonesia.” Soumatera Law Review 1, no. 1 (2018): 10. https://doi.org/10.22216/soumlaw.v1i1.3312.
Terisno, Prisilia Anggraini Evelyn, and Yuliana Angela. “Penjatuhan Dua Putusan Perkara Pidana Dalam Suatu Objek Perkara Yang Sama (Kajian Putusan Nomor 2135 K/Pid.Sus/2016).” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law (IJoCL) 1, no. 1 (2019): 105–37. https://doi.org/10.31960/ijocl.v1i1.145.
Umam, Ahmad Khoirul, Gillian Whitehouse, Brian Head, and Mohammed Adil Khan. “Addressing Corruption in Post-Soeharto Indonesia: The Role of the Corruption Eradication Commission.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 50, no. 1 (2020): 125–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2018.1552983.
Wahyuningrum, Kartika Sasi, Hari Sutra Disemadi, and Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya. “Independensi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi: Benarkah Ada?” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 2 (2020): 250. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2020.v4.i2.p239-258.
Yanto, Oksidelfa. “Efektifitas Putusan Pemidanaan Maksimal Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Rangka Pengentasan Kemiskinan.” Syiah Kuala Law Journal 1, no. 2 (2017): 18–36. https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v1i2.8471.
Yusriadi, Sy., Suhadi, and Rosdiana. “Analisis Hukum Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Perbarengan Antara Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dengan Tindak Pidana Narkotika Di Kota Balikpapan.” Lex Suprema 2, no. 1 (2020): 131.
Downloads
Total Abstract Views: 55 |
Total Downloads: 55
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
