The Relevance of Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2020 in Efforts of State Losses Refund through Restorative Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio.v2i2.2434Abstract
The government has moved quickly to find a legal breakthrough related to reducing corruption in Indonesia. One of the efforts made by the government is through the Supreme Court to eradicate corruption is the enactment of Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2020 concerning Guidelines for the Criminalization of Articles 2 and 3 of the Law on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. The consideration is that the imposition of a crime must be carried out with due regard for the certainty and proportionality of punishment to realize justice based on Pancasila and the Republic of Indonesia's 1945 Constitution. The objectives of the Supreme Court Regulation prioritize victim’s losses to be recovered. Moreover, the regulation proportional benefits in imposing penalties on criminal cases is compatible with the Restorative Justice approach. The restorative justice process is expected to be a legal breakthrough in restoring state finances, with dealing with Criminal Corruption Cases focusing on efforts to restore state finances as a whole rather than just prosecuting the perpetrators. Thus, the purpose of this research is to determine how relevant Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2020 are to efforts to recover state losses through restorative justice. This research employs both a normative and an empirical legal approach. Data were gathered through literature reviews and field studies and analyzed qualitatively. The present study confirmed the author's thoughts about the relevancies of Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2020 to recover state losses through restorative justice as Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2020 play a role as a law enforcement's main element as a legal substance.
Keywords:
Corruption, Supreme Court Regulation, Restorative JusticeReferences
Alatas, Syed Husein. Sosiologi Korupsi, Sebuah Penjelajahan Dengan Data Kontemporer. Jakarta: LP3ES, 1983.
Atmadja, Arifin P. Soeria. Keuangan Publik Dalam Persfektif Hukum Teori, Praktik Dan Kritik,. Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2007.
Chazawi, Adam. Hukum Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Bandung: Alumni, 2006.
Erinsyah, Ridhollah Agung, Elwi Danil, and Yoserwan Yoserwan. “Reform of Criminal Law through Restorative Justice in Returning State Losses from Corporation as the Perpetrator of Corruption.” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) 6, no. 6 (2019): 497–508. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i6.1252.
Garcia, Virginia, Hari Sutra Disemadi, and Barda Nawawi Arief. “The Enforcement of Restorative Justice in Indonesia Criminal Law.” Ilmiah Hukum 28, no. 1 (2020): 24. https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/article/view/10680.
Genger, Peter. “Combating Corruption With African Restorative Justice.” African Journal of Criminology and Justice Studies 11, no. 1 (2018): 20–40. https://www.umes.edu/AJCJS/Pages/Vol--11--Issue-1--Spring-2018/.
González, Thalia, and Annalise J. Buth. “Restorative Justice at the Crossroads: Politics, Power, and Language.” Contemporary Justice Review: Issues in Criminal, Social, and Restorative Justice 22, no. 3 (2019): 242–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2019.1644172.
Gude, Alejandra Díaz, San Sebastián, and Iván Navarro. “Restorative Justice and Legal Culture.” Criminology & Criminal Justice 20, no. 1 (2020): 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895818796549.
Habib, Ali. “Application of Restorative Justice in Corruption Crime Cases as an Effort to Repay State Losses.” Corruptio 1, no. 1 (2020): 1. https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio.v1i1.2069.
Halim. Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2004.
Hastuti, Kurnia Siwi. “Pembaharuan Hukum Pedoman Pemidanaan Terhadap Disparitas Putusan Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) 2, no. 2 (2021): 92 – 102.
Kinyanjui, Sarah. “Definition Deadlock Or a Necessary Definition Gap? Towards Infusing the Criminal Justice System with Restorative Justice Values.” E. Afr. L.J. 149 (2019).
Pratama, Vega. “Restorative Justice in Criminal Acts of Corruption.” Law and Justice 6, no. 1 (2021): 34–45. https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v6i1.12541.
Suhariyanto, Budi. “Restorative Justice Dalam Pemidanaan Korporasi Pelaku Korupsi Demi Optimalisasi Pengembalian Kerugian Negara.” Rechtsviinding 5, no. 3 (2016): 422.
Sukoyo, Yeremia. “Perma No 1 Tahun 2020 Untuk Perkecil Disparitas Hukuman Koruptor.” BeritaSatu.com, 2020. https://www.beritasatu.com/nasional/662239/perma-no-1-tahun-2020-untuk-perkecil-disparitas-hukuman-koruptor.
Susanto, Vendy Yhulia Hidayat, Khomarul. “MA Terbitkan Perma 1/2020, ICW: Hakim Yang Tidak Mengikuti Harus Ada Sanksi.” Kontan.co.id, 2020. https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/ma-terbitkan-perma-12020-icw-hakim-yang-tidak-mengikuti-harus-ada-sanksi.
Susilowati, Christina Maya Indah. “Establishing Humanistic Tendencies Through Restorative Justice In The Law Enforcement Context.” Journal Of Legal, Ethical And Regulatory Issues 22, no. 2 (2019).
Zaidan, M. Ali. Heading to Criminal Law Reform. Jakarta: Sinar Grafari, 2015.
Chazawi, Adam. Hukum Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Bandung: Alumni, 2006.
Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2020 concerning Guidelines for the Criminalization of Article 2 and Article 3 of the Law on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes
Susanto, Vendy Yhulia Hidayat, Khomarul. “MA Terbitkan Perma 1/2020, ICW: Hakim Yang Tidak Mengikuti Harus Ada Sanksi.” Kontan.co.id, 2020. https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/ma-terbitkan-perma-12020-icw-hakim-yang-tidak-mengikuti-harus-ada-sanksi.
Downloads
Total Abstract Views: 65 |
Total Downloads: 50
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
