Investigation of Money Laundering Cases by Investigators Who Do Not Investigated the Predicate Crime
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio.v4i2.3213Abstract
Combining predicate crime investigations with money laundering cases is very possible if investigators find sufficient preliminary evidence of the occurrence of money laundering crimes when investigating predicate crimes. Then the merger of predicate crime investigations and money laundering cases is the authority given to investigators. This paper aims to find out about the investigation of money laundering case by other investigators who did not investigate the predicate crime, and who have not investigated the predicate crime. The research method used in this paper is a doctrinal method with a statutory, case, and conceptual approach. The results of this study are that if in accordance with Article 74 of the Money Laundering Law in conjunction with Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Money Laundering Law, the two investigative agencies have the same authority to investigate predicate crimes and both are also authorized to investigate money laundering cases, the investigator agency is authorized to investigate money laundering cases where the predicate crime investigation was carried out by investigators from different agencies.
Keywords:
Investigation, Predicate Crime, Money Laundering, CoordinationReferences
Achid, A. N dan Azmi, I. F. “Penghindaran Pajak dalam Diskursus Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.”Jurnal Pandecta, 15.(2) (2020): 167-177
Ahmad, A. "Analisis Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Hukum Eropa Kontinental dan Anglosaxon Dalam Sistem Peradilan di Negara Republik Indonesia." Jurnal Petitum 9. (2021).
Chandra,Y. I., and Okta, S.. "Kedudukan Kejahatan asal (Predicate Crime) dalam Pembuktian Perkara pencucian uang." Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan 1.2 (2016): 153-169
Constitutional Court Decision No. 15/PUU-XIX/2021
Constitutional Court Decision No. 35/PUU-XV/2017
Constitutional Court Decision No. 74/PUU-XVI/2018
Febriansyah, A, Zulfa, E. A. Yusuf, M. and Banjarani, D "Reversal Burden Of Proof In Process Of Proving Money Laundering Cases In Indonesia," Indonesia Law Review. 13 (1), (2023): 17-35
Husein, Y, Bunga Rampai Anti Pencucian Uang, Bandung: Books Terrace and Library, 2007.
Instruction Letter of Deputy Attorney General for Special Crimes (Jampidsus) No. B-2107/F/Fd.1/10/2011
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) dan Australian Departement of Home Affairs bekerja sama dengan Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia (PSHK) dan Australia-Indonesia Partnership for Justice (AIPJ). Pedoman Penanganan Perkara pencucian uang dan Pemulihan Aset di Pasar Modal. Jakarta: KPK, 2018.
Lamintang, P. A. F. et al. Pembahasan KUHAP menurut Ilmu Pengetahuan Hukum Pidana dan Yursiprudensi, Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.
Law No, 8 of 2010 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering
Law No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power
Lutfi, C. "Penemuan Dan Penafsiran Hukum Hakim Mahkamah Agung Tentang Penyelesaian Sengketa Pembiayaan Akad Musyarakah." Syar'ie: Jurnal Pemikiran Ekonomi Islam 4 (1) (2021).: 67-94.
Mannheim, H. Criminal Justice and Social Reconstruction, Oxfordshire: Taylor & Francis, 1946.
Nugraha, H. S. "Konstruksi Hukum Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Untuk Memutus Constitutional Complaint." Amanna Gappa, 29(2) (2021): 79-90.
Nurhayati, Y. I., and Said, M. Y.. "Metodologi Normatif Dan Empiris Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Hukum." Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1) (2021): 1-20.
Oktahandika, Ronny. “Pembuktian Kejahatan Asal (Predicate Crime) Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Pada Pelaku Pasif,” Jurnal Legal Reasoning, Vol. 1, No. 2, (2019): 156-171
Prawira, T. S. "Pemanfaatan Laporan Hasil Analisis (LHA) PPATK dalam Penyidikan Perkara pencucian uang Oleh Penyidik Polri," Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 7(5) (2022): 6250-6262.
Ramdan, Ajie. “The Influence of Decision of The Constitutional Court No. 77 / PUU-XII / 2014 on The Eradication of Money Laudering - Comparing Indonesia to The Other Three Countries,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 17 (3) (2017): 413–25.
Tamara, A. C. "Eksistensi Penemuan Hukum Dan Asas Legalitas Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bengkulu Nomor 410/Pid. B/2014/Pn. Bgl Tentang Tindak Pidana Perkosaan)." Lex Crimen, 10 (3) (2021): 74-75.
Tantowi, W. "Problematika Jangka Waktu Penahanan Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum (Studi Putusan Nomor 29/Pid. Sus-Anak/2018/PN. SMN)," Verstek, 9(2) (2021): 464-470
Yanuar, M. A. “The Environment and Forestry Investigators’ Authority in Money Laundering Offenses." Corruptio 2(2) (2021): 83-98.
Yanuar, Muh. Afdal. “Diskursus Antara Kedudukan Delik Pencucian Uang sebagai Independent Crime dengan Sebagai Follow Up Crime Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 90/PUU-XIII/2015.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16(4) (2020): 726-727.
Yuharfiandri and Sunawir. N. H. D. “Analisis Penanganan Tindak Pidana Asal dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XIX/2021 Ditinjau dari Penjelasan Pasal 74 UU Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dengan Parallel Investigation Approach”, Padjadjaran Law Review, 10 (2), (2022)
Downloads
Total Abstract Views: 73 |
Total Downloads: 59
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2023 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
