Disclaimer of Political Rights As An Effort to Eradicate Corruption
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio.v5i1.3263Abstract
Corruption is an extraordinary crime, so extraordinary methods are also needed to prevent and eradicate this crime. The imposition of serious crimes is one of the ways needed to eradicate them, then new punitive breakthroughs are also needed in order to provide a sense of deterrence and fear to both the perpetrators and the community. Several cases that have been decided during the trial of corruption at the first level, among others, are on behalf of the accused, Inspector General. Djoko Susilo in the corruption case of the procurement of a driving license (SIM) simulator tool, the KPK Public Prosecutor demanded additional crimes of revoking the right to vote and vote in general elections and public office (political rights), and the panel of judges granted the demands at the appeal level. This additional punishment is regulated in article 35 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with article 18 paragraph (1) of Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Corruption. This research uses normative legal research methods, supported by primary, secondary and tertiary legal sources. With descriptive qualitative analysis.The problem with this additional punishment for depriving political rights is how to apply this additional punishment for depriving political rights in the prevention and eradication of corruption, because of course the KPK has strong reasons why this additional punishment is included as a punishment for perpetrators of corruption.
Keywords:
Revocation of Political Rights, CorruptionReferences
Abu Fida'Abdur Rafi, Corruption Disease Therapy with Tazkiyatun (Soul Purification), Jakarta, Republika, 2006.
Aerlang, Mutiara, and Annisa Reginasari. “Pakar Rupia (Apa Kerja Keras Koruptor Indonesia?): Membangun Sanksi Psikososial Bagi Terpidana Kasus Korupsi.” Integritas 2, no. 1 (2016): 175–89.
Ardiansyah, Denny. “Pencabutan Hak Untuk Memilih Dan Dipilih Bagi Terpidana Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 8, no. 2 (2017): 139–48. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v8i2.1802.
Aziz, M. Wahib. “Sanksi Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Fiqih Jinayat.” International Journal Ihya’ ’Ulum Al-Din 18, no. 2 (2017): 159. https://doi.org/10.21580/ihya.17.2.1735.
Budiman, Maman. “PROBLEMATIKA PENERAPAN PASAL 2 DAN 18 UNDANG-UNDANG PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI.” Jurnal Yudisial 9, no. 3 (December 9, 2016): 303–15. https://doi.org/10.29123/JY.V9I3.13.
Ernest Runtukahu, "Corruption in the Concept of Formal Law and the Concept of Material Law”, Lex Crimen, Vol.1, Number 2, 2012.
Fatimah. “Kebijakan Formulasi Asas Vicariuos Liability Dalam Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia.” Rechtsidee 9, no. 2 (2014): 223–38.
Fernando I. Kansil. “Sanksi Pidana Dalam Sistem Pemidanaan Menurut Kuhp Dan Di Luar Kuhp.” Lex Crimen 3, no. 3 (2014): 26–34. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/5296.
Genova Damanik, Kristwan. “Antara Uang Pengganti Dan Kerugian Negara Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 45, no. 1 (2016): 1. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.45.1.2016.1-10.
J. E. Sahetapy, Translation of Schaffmeter et a1, Criminal Law, Yogyakarta, Liberty, 2005.
Juandra, Juandra, Mohd Din, and Darmawan Darmawan. “Kewenangan Hakim Menjatuhkan Pidana Uang Pengganti Dalam Perkara Korupsi Yang Tidak Didakwakan Pasal 18 Uu Tipikor.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 6, no. 2 (2021): 442. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v6i2.4235.
Karya, Jalu Amandan dan Savitri, Ramadina. “Permohonan Pencabutan Hak Remisi Sebagai Pidana.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 2, no. 1 (2015): 15–27.
“KPK: Hak Politik 26 Koruptor Dicabut Sepanjang 2013-2017.” Accessed August 30, 2023. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/09/18/13252541/kpk-hak-politik-26-koruptor-dicabut-sepanjang-2013-2017.
Listyorini, Dyah, Adi Suliantoro, and Fitika Andraini. “IMPLEMENTASI UNDANG UNDANG NOMOR 20 Tahun 2001 TERHADAP MATA KULIAH PENDIDIKAN ANTI KORUPSI PADA MAHASISWA UNIVERSITAS STIKUBANK SEMARANG.” Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha 9, no. 1 (November 14, 2021): 223–32. https://doi.org/10.23887/JPKU.V9I1.32723.
Miriam Budiardjo, Fundamentals of Political Science, Jakarta, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2010.
MuIksan, M. (Muchamad). “Asas Legalitas Dalam Hukum Pidana : Studi Komparatif Asas Legalitas Hukum Pidana Indonesia Dan Hukum Pidana Islam (Jinayah).” Serambi Hukum 11, no. 01 (July 29, 2017): 1–26. https://www.neliti.com/id/publications/163598/.
Sabigin, Cecep Dudi Muklis. “PERSPEKTIF PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM OLEH PEJABAT PUBLIK DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI.” Jurnal Konstituen 3, no. 1 (2021): 49–58.
Sartono, Kus Eddy. “KAJIAN KONSTITUSI INDONESIA DARI AWAL KEMERDEKAAN SAMPAI REFORMASI KONSTITUSI PASCA ORDE BARU.” Humanika, Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum 8, no. 1 (August 28, 2008). https://doi.org/10.21831/HUM.V8I1.21011.
Setiadi, Wicipto. “Korupsi Di Indonesia Penyebab, Hambatan, Solusi Dan Regulasi.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 15, no. 3 (November 21, 2018): 249–62. https://doi.org/10.54629/JLI.V15I3.234.
Sofyanoor, Andin. “Peran Hukum Administrasi Negara Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia.” SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan 1, no. 2 (2022): 21–30. https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v1i2.9.
Downloads
Total Abstract Views: 35 |
Total Downloads: 28
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2024 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
