Probative Value of KPPU Decisions in Bid Rigging Corruption under Law Number 20 of 2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio.v7i1.5317Abstract
Bid rigging reflects the intersection between competition law and corruption, particularly where collusive procurement practices result in state financial losses. This study examines the legal status and probative value of decisions issued by the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) as documentary evidence in corruption investigations following the enactment of Law Number 20 of 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). The research employs a normative legal methodology using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings show that final and binding (inkracht) KPPU decisions constitute admissible documentary evidence under the new KUHAP because they contain objective factual findings concerning the actus reus of bid-rigging. These findings also provide persuasive evidence from which investigators may infer mens rea, subject to corroboration with other admissible evidence. The recognition of KPPU decisions strengthens corruption investigations by enabling investigators from the Police, the Attorney General's Office, and the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) to build upon established findings of collusive conduct while coordinating with authorized audit institutions to establish state financial losses. The study recommends adopting cross-institutional technical regulations to facilitate digital evidence sharing and interoperability between the KPPU and criminal justice agencies, thereby improving investigative efficiency and supporting the principle of a speedy trial in procurement-related corruption cases..
Keywords:
Bid Rigging, Corruption Offenses, KPPU Decisions, Law Number 20 of 2025Downloads
Total Abstract Views: 0 |
Total Downloads: 0
References
Anggusti, M., D. M. Sinaga, and J. Simamora. "Penggunaan Indirect Evidence (Alat Bukti Tindak Langsung) Oleh KPPU Dalam Proses Pembuktian Dugaan Praktik Kartel (Studi Di Kantor Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Wilayah I Medan)." NJLO 2, no. 1 (2021): 37–46. https://doi.org/10.51622/njlo.v2i01.207.
Antoni, V. "Penegakan Hukum Atas Perkara Kartel Di Luar Persekongkolan Tender Di Indonesia." Mimbar Hukum 31, no. 1 (2019): 95–111. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.37966.
Ardani, M. Y. B. "Penerapan Justice Collaborator Dalam Reposisi Penegakan Hukum Indonesia Pada Kasus Persekongkolan Gabungan Tender." Jurnal Wasaka Hukum: Jendela Informasi Dan Gagasan Hukum 12, no. 2 (2024): 268. https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v12i2.87809.
Arifin, Z., A. S. Karyadi, and M. Arifin. "Unhealthy Business Competition In Government Procurement Of Goods/Services In Indonesia: An Analysis Of The Friedman Legal System." Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial 12, no. 1 (2026). https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v12i1.4597.
Ariman, R., A. Arrisman, and E. Gultom. "Juridical Analysis Of Tender Contract Law Enforcement According To Law Number 5 Of 1999 Concerning Prohibition Of Monopolistic Practices And Unfair Business Competition." Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities 5, no. 5 (2025): 3711–3720. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i5.1862.
Atmasasmita, R. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer. Kencana Prenada Media Group, (2014).
Azhari, B. A., S. Samian, and S. Hardjomuljadi. "Tinjauan Yuridis Aspek Hukum Pidana Dalam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Untuk Menjamin Akuntabilitas Dan Transparansi Pengelolaan Keuangan Negara." Jurnal Impresi Indonesia 5, no. 1 (2026). https://doi.org/10.58344/jii.v5i1.7440.
Bhakti, S., Z. Asikin, and S. Sahnan. "Eksistensi Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Dalam Penanganan Persekongkolan Tender Dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif Indonesia." Jurnal Empirisme Sosial 4, no. 1 (2020): 38–52. https://doi.org/10.24036/jess.v4i1.231.
DM, Mohd. Y., S. H. Fatriah, and E. Wahyudi. "Persinggungan Kewenangan Polri Dan KPK Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Analisis Yuridis." Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi 13, no. 2 (2025): 752–762. https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v13i2.6374.
Fatria, M., E. Danil, A. Zurnetti, and A. Fendri. "Legal Implications Of Corruption Cases Without Initial State Losses In Audit But Found During Investigation Case Of Issuing Ship Permits." BIO Web of Conferences 134 (2024): 04005. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202413404005.
Heriyanto, R. "Peran Aparat Penegak Hukum Dalam Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Kolusi Dalam Proyek Pemerintah." Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling 6, no. 12 (2025). https://doi.org/10.59141/japendi.v6i12.9064.
Hutapea, E. M. "The Juridical Analysis Of A Comparative Study On The Law Of Evidence In Cases Of Individual Hate Crimes Against Religion And Race (A Case Study Of The Verdicts With Register Numbers: 1876/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Mdn And 2429/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Mdn)." International Journal of Economic, Technology and Social Sciences 3, no. 2 (2023): 323–331. https://doi.org/10.53695/injects.v3i2.828.
Kolono, S., and L. Sumanto. "Eksaminasi Putusan Sah Atau Tidaknya Penetapan Tersangka Demi Keadilan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1/Pid.Prap/2022/PN Sos)." Ensiklopedia Education Review 6, no. 3 (2024): 121–131. https://doi.org/10.33559/eer.v6i3.2850.
Maheswari, A. A. "Batasan, Wewenang Dan Keterlibatan KPPU Dalam Kasus Persekongkolan Tender Menurut Hukum Persaingan Usaha." Jurist-Diction 3, no. 5 (2020): 1581–1596. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v3i5.21967.
Majid, T. S., and N. G. N. R. Maharaini. "Analisis Yuridis Persekongkolan Tender (Studi Putusan KPPU Nomor 30/KPPU-I/2019)." Reformasi Hukum Trisakti 5, no. 4 (2022): 962–972. https://doi.org/10.25105/refor.v5i4.18379.
Maksum, U., and R. Sara. "Synergy Of Administrative Law And Criminal Law As A Strategy For Harmonizing Law Enforcement Against Corruption In Government Procurement Of Goods And Services." Journal of Global Strategy and Policy 3, no. 4 (2025). https://doi.org/10.38035/jgsp.v3i4.540.
P., A. E., and F. Ges. M. B. H. "Relevansi Pembuktian Kartel Dengan Menggunakan Indirect Evidence Berdasarkan Studi Putusan Di Indonesia." Journal of Studia Legalia 4, no. 1 (2023): 88–94. https://doi.org/10.61084/jsl.v4i01.67.
Panjaitan, M. P., I. Haryanto, and I. E. Joesoef. "Vertical Collusion And Re-Running Tender: A Study Of The Decision Of The Indonesian Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) NO: 17/KPPU-L/2022." International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences 3, no. 6 (2024). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i6.1010.
Prasetya, H. I., and D. W. Muhammad. "Pembuktian Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Persekongkolan Tender." Media of Law and Sharia 3, no. 1 (2022): 21–39. https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v3i1.13223.
Puspaningrum, G., I. W. Yasa, and L. C. Putri. "A Legal Perspective Toward Unlawful Acts In Tender Collusion In Indonesia." Media Iuris 8, no. 3 (2025): 439–460. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v8i3.68535.
Reza, M., M. Hawin, and N. N. Sirait. "Legal Position Of Business Competition Law In The Perspective Of Legal Certainty In Indonesia: A Normative Study Of Law No. 5 Of 1999 Post-Omnibus Law." Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum 24, no. 1 (2025): 1295–1313. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i1.6010.
Rumagit, R. B. "Analisis Putusan KPPU Yang Melampaui Kewenangan Berdasarkan UU Larangan Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha." Jurnal Supremasi 14, no. 2 (2024): 130–141. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v14i2.3805.
Sajid, M., Z. Asikin, and M. N. Muhaimin. "Integrasi Kewenangan KPPU Dengan Penyidik Kepolisian Dalam Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Pasca Putusan KPPU." Indonesia Berdaya 4, no. 2 (2023): 777–784. https://doi.org/10.47679/ib.2023483.
Saragih, H. Y., T. Y. Chandra, and S. T. Paparang. "Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Tata Kelola Niaga Komoditas Di Indonesia." Sinergi 2, no. 8 (2025): 3705–3717. https://doi.org/10.62335/sinergi.v2i8.1639.
Sari, L., R. K. Katjong, A. A. N. Mamonto, A. Ramli, and D. A. Bakung. "Indirect Evidence In Disclosing Cartel Violations Under Business Competition Law In Indonesia." Journal of Dinamika Hukum 24, no. 1 (2024): 54. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2024.24.1.4053.
Siswanti, T. "Tracing Digital Collusion: A Forensic Legal Framework For Asset Recovery In Indonesian E-Commerce." Sinergi International Journal of Logistics 3, no. 3 (2025): 157–167. https://doi.org/10.61194/sijl.v3i3.887.
Sulaiman, A., D. Cahyadi, Iwansyah, R. Prasetyo, and Pambudi. "Paradigm Changes In Proving Unlawful Acts In Corruption Crimes Following Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/PUU-XIV/2016." Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum 24, no. 2 (2025): 6786–6802. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.6648.
Suud, A. K. "Optimization Of The Role Of Asset Recovery Center (PPA) Of The Attorney-General’s Office Of The Republic Of Indonesia In Asset Recovery Of Corruption Crime Results." Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 9, no. 2 (2020): 211–231. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.2.2020.211-231.
Suwita, A. S. "Kewenangan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Dan Kejaksaan Agung Dalam Eksekusi Sanksi Denda Pada Kasus Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia." At-Tanwir Law Review 3, no. 2 (2023): 124. https://doi.org/10.31314/atlarev.v3i2.2237.
Tedjokusumo, D. D. "Praktik Persekongkolan Tender Dalam Pengadaan Paket Pembangunan Revetment Dan Pengurungan Lahan Di Pelabuhan." Jurnal Ius Constituendum 8, no. 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v8i3.7193.
Tobing, M. H., N. N. Sirait, and M. Siregar. "Contiguity Of Law Violations In The Context Of Business Competition And Corruption In Bid Rigging Cases." Journal of Ecohumanism 3, no. 8 (2024). https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.4748.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
