Dispute Settlement Practices through the Religious Court’s Mobile Court (Sidang Keliling)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v14no3.1708

Abstract

This research is attempted to analyze the practices of mobile court and compare it with others. Based on the results of the study, the conclusions that can be obtained are that the implementation of the circuit court conducted at the Tasikmalaya District Religious Court has fulfilled several principles of civil procedural law, namely fast, simple and low cost. Among them when people who experience obstacles to come to the court office for reasons of distance, transportation and costs of the court come directly to the location, the bureaucracy is not complicated meaning that the implementation of the trial must be completed no later than 4 times the hearing, and the existence of an effective control system and various elements. Obstacles in the conduct of circuit courts include no standard guidelines for the holding of circuit courts, not all cases registered by residents are resolved in circuit courts, limited budgets, cases that have not been heard are all without prodeo, facilities and infrastructure, and not all religious courts hold circuit courts.

Keywords:

Mobile Court, Dispute Settlement, Religious Court

References

Ali, Daud Muhammad. Hukum Islam Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2000.

Anggaran Bantuan Pengadilan Agama, October 1, 2018. www.pa-kandangan.go.id.

Cahyadi, Thalis Noor. “Efektifitas Pos Bantuan Hukum Di Pengadilan (Studi Pada Posbakum Pengadilan Agama Sleman Tahun 2011-2012).” Jurnal Rechts Vinding 2, No. 1 (2013).

Fakhriah, E. L. “Eksistensi Hakim Perdamaian Desa Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa di Pengadilan Negeri.” Jurnal Sosio Humaniora 18, No. 2 (2016). https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v18i2.9942.

Harahap, Krisna. Hukum Acara Perdata. Bandung: Grafiti Budi Utami, 2007.

Hazar Kusmayanti, Sherly Ayuna Puteri. “Implementasi Perma No. 1 Tahun 2015 terhadap Pelaksanaan Sidang Keliling.” Jurnal Adhaper 11, (2018).

Het Herziene Indonesisch Reglement or HIR.

Hidayatullah, M. Zaky. “Efektivitas Sidang Keliling Pengadilan Agama Sampit Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Hukum Keluarga.” Jurnal Studi Agama dan Masyarakat 12, No. 2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.23971/jsam.v12i2.480.

Kansil, C.S.T. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1998.

Khisni, H. A. “Peradilan Agama Sebagai Peradilan Keluarga Serta Perkembangan Studi Hukum Islam di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Universitas Sultan Agung 25, No. 1 (2011).

Kurniati, N. “Mediasi-Arbitrase Untuk Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah.” Jurnal Sosio Humaniora 18, No. 3 (2016). https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v18i3.10008.

Law No. 48 on 2009 of Judicial Power.

Law No. 7 on1989 as amended by Law No. 3/2006 and Law No. 50/2009 of Religious Courts.

Memberi Keadilan Bagi Pencari Keadilan, March 24, 2018. https://www.pekka.or.id/.../Providing%29Justice_Indonesian.pdf.

Muhammad Latief Fauzi,(2017),“Efektivitas Sidang Keliling (Studi di Pengadilan Agama Wonogiri)”, Jurnal Ad-Dalah 14, No. 2, https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v14i2.2057.

Mujahidin, Ahmad. Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2012.

Perma No.1 on 2015 of integrated services of Sidang Keliling the district and religious courts / syar'iyah courts in the context of the issuance of marriage certificates, marriage books, and birth certificates.

Saleh, M., Mulyadi Lilik. Bunga Rampai Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia (Perspektif, Teoritis, Praktik dan Permasalahannya). Bandung: Alumni, 2012.

Siding Keliling Prodeo, June 2018. http://www.pta-bandung.go.id/sidang-keliling-prodeo-posbakum.html.

Soebekti. Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Bina Cipta, 1977.

Soekamto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press, 2007.

Soerjono Soekamto dan Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2018.

Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2013.

Sutantio, Retnowulan, Iskandar Oeripkartawinata. Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 1997.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Total Abstract Views: 292 | Total Downloads: 153

Downloads

Authors

  • Hazar Kusmayanti UniversitasPadjadjaran, Indonesia
  • Sherly Ayuna Puteri UniversitasPadjadjaran, Indonesia

Published

2020-05-15

How to Cite

Kusmayanti, Hazar, and Sherly Ayuna Puteri. 2020. “Dispute Settlement Practices through the Religious Court’s Mobile Court (Sidang Keliling)”. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 14 (3):287-30. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v14no3.1708.

Issue

Section

Articles