Moral Paradigm in the Establishment of Regulation on Parliamentary Thresholds: An Indonesian Implementation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no1.2140

Abstract

The moral paradigm in establishing legal norms about parliamentary thresholds in legislative elections is studied through historical, conceptual, and statutory approaches. Figures' perspectives on the moral paradigm and nature's laws are an analysis benchmark. This research is a legal analysis with a conceptual approach. The main objective of this research was to analyse the moral paradigm in the formation of laws regarding parliamentary thresholds in Indonesian elections. According to this research, the establishment and implementation of parliamentary threshold legal norms cannot meet the main legal objectives, namely justice, because parliamentary thresholds are designed to limit political parties' eligibility for parliament in subsequent elections. Therefore, the government canceled the application of the parliamentary threshold through lawmakers and the Constitutional Court in the next election.

Keywords:

Moral, Paradigm, Parliamentary Threshold

References

Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin. “Akibat Hukum Regulasi Tentang Threshold Dalam Pemilihan Umum Legislatif Dan Pemilihan Presiden: Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 52/PUU-X/2012 Dan Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013.” Jurnal Yudisial 12, no. 1 (2019): 17–38. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v12i1.258.

“Electoral Regulation in Indonesia : Is It Modern Law ?” Unnes Law Journal 6, no. 2 (2020): 205–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v6i2.41627.

“Implementasi Parliamentary Threshold Dalam Pemilihan Anggota Dprd Provinsi Dan Dprd Kabupaten/Kota.” Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam 6, no. 2 (2018): 363–88. https://doi.org/10.21274/ahkam.2018.6.2.363-388.

“Parliamentary Threshold in Integrative Legal Perspective: Indonesian Case.” Jambe Law Journal 3, no. 2 (2020): 103–17. https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.3.2.103-117.

“Penerapan Threshold Dalam Pemilu.” Audito Comparative Law Journal 1, no. 2 (2020): 78–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22219/audito.v1i2.13973.

Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin, Muchammad Ali Safaat, and Muhammad Dahlan. “Reformulasi Parliamentary Threshold Yang Berkeadilan Dalam Pemilu Legislatif Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum, 2014, 1–20. http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/viewFile/1018/1007.

Ananda, Suadamara. “Hukum Dan Moralitas.” Pro Justisia 24, no. 3 (2006): 301–8. https://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/projustitia/article/download/1163/1130.

Bachmid, Fahri. “Eksistensi Kedaulatan Rakyat Dan Implementasi Parliamentary Threshold Dalam Sistem Pemilihan Umum Di Indonesia.” SIGn Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 2 (2020): 87–103. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i2.83.

Bingham, Lord. “The Rule of Law.” The Cambridge Law Journal 66, no. 1 (2007): 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197307000037.

Chalmers, A.F. What Is This Thing Called Science? 3rd ed. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 1982. https://ebookppsunp.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/alan_chalmers_what_is_this_thing_called_sciencebookfi-org.pdf.

Erlyn Indarti. “Diskresi Dan Paradigma.” Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro, 2010.

Esfandiari, Fitria, and Sholahuddin Al-Fatih. “Initiating A Permanent Electoral Body to Resolve Dignified Election Disputes: Assessing The Effectiveness of Gakkumdu.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 9, no. 3 (2020): 333. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v9i3.44437.

Fauzani, Muhammad Addi, and Fandi Nu Rohman. “Urgensi Rekonstruksi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Memberikan Pertimbangan Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka (Open Legal Policy).” Justitia Et Pax: Jurnal Hukum 35, no. 5 (2019): 127–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v35i2.2501.

Fendabi, Vanu. “Penerapan Ambang Batas Presidensil (Presidential Threshold) Sebagai Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka Dalam Pemilihan Umum Di Indonesia (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor.53/PUUXV/ 2017).” UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, 2019.

Fuady, Munir. Teori-Teori Besar Dalam Hukum: Grand Theory. 3rd ed. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2014.

Hadi, Syofyan. “Kekuatan Mengikat Hukum Dalam Perspektif Mazhab Hukum Alam Dan Mazhab Positivisme Hukum.” Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 25, no. 1 (2018): 86. https://doi.org/10.22219/jihl.v25i1.5992.

Hidayat, A. “Orientasi Pemikiran Hukum Berkarakter Keindonesiaan Dalam Perspektif Teori Hukum.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 2, no. 2 (2015): 162–72. https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v2i2.1426.

Irwansyah. Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Edited by Ahsan Yunus. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media, 2020.

Kholis, Nur. “Parliamentary Threshold And Political Rights Limitation.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 1, no. 3 (2020): 445–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v1i3.36702.

L. Fuller, Lon. The Morality of Law. Virginia: Yale Law School, 1963.

Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of Democracy, Government Forms & Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. 2nd ed. Yale: Yale University Press, 2012. https://e-edu.nbu.bg/pluginfile.php/830138/mod_resource/content/1/Lijphart%2C A. Patterns of Democracy - Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries %282012%29.pdf.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2009.McCoubrey, Hilaire, and Nigel D White. Textbook on Jurisprudence. London: Blackstone Press Limited, 1996.

Mellaz, August. “Praktek Penerapan Keberlakuan 3,5 Persen Ambang Batas Parlemen Secara Nasional Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pemilu.” Jakarta, 2012.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. 13th ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University press, 1999. https://www.cita.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/John-Rawls-A-Theory-of-Justice-Belknap-Press-1999.pdf.

Setiawan, Agus. “Penalaran Hukum Yang Mampu Mewujudkan Tujuan Hukum Secara Proporsional.” Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia 3, no. 2 (2017): 204. https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v3i2.257.

Subiharta. “Moralitas Hukum Dalam Hukum Praksis Sebagai Suatu Keutamaan (Legal Morality in Practical Law as a Virtue).” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 4, no. 3 (2015): 385–98. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.4.3.2015.385-398.

Sugiri, Bambang. “Lapisan-Lapisan Studi Tentang Hukum.” 2020.

“Lapisan Ilmu Hukum.” 2020.

Sulistiyono, Adi. “Menggapai Mutiara Keadilan: Membangun Pengadilan Yang Independen Dengan Paradigma Moral.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 2 (2005): 152–84.

Wardiono, Kelik, and Khudzaifah Dimyati. “Basis Epistemologis Paradigma Rasional Dalam Ilmu Hukum: Sebuah Deskripsi Tentang Asumsi-Asumsi Dasar Teori Hukum Murni-Hans Kelsen.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 14, no. 3 (2014): 369–83. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2014.14.3.304.

Wibowo, Mardian. “Menakar Konstitusionalitas Sebuah Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 2 (2016): 196. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1221.

Wibowo, Sugeng. “Integrasi Epistimologi Hukum Transendental Sebagai Paradigma Hukum Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Legal Standing 1, no. 1 (2017): 61–82. https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v1i1.570.

Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo. “Memperbincangkan ‘Hukum’ Dari Perspektif Filsafat: Paradigma Hukum Dan Pergeserannya Dalam Sejarah.” Jurnal Digest Epistema 1, no. 1 (2011): 7–12. https://epistema.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/digest_epistema_vol1.pdf.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Total Abstract Views: 50 | Total Downloads: 49

Downloads

Authors

  • Sholahuddin Al-Fatih Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Siboy Universitas Islam Malang, Indonesia

Published

2022-06-07

How to Cite

Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin, and Ahmad Siboy. 2022. “Moral Paradigm in the Establishment of Regulation on Parliamentary Thresholds: An Indonesian Implementation”. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 16 (1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no1.2140.

Issue

Section

Articles