Compulsory Licensing in Intellectual Property Rights (IPR): Current Application and Future Prospects in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v18no2.3399Abstract
The implementation of Compulsory Licensing in the procurement of anti-retroviral drugs to combat the HIV/AIDS epidemic, which poses a significant threat to Indonesia and global public health, exemplifies the essential necessity and utility of this concept. Compulsory Licensing is pivotal not only for community health but also for advancing Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) law. This research aims to explore the future prospects of Compulsory Licensing and propose regulatory reforms in Indonesia. Utilizing a normative juridical approach, the study concludes that Compulsory Licensing holds strong potential as a countermeasure and in balancing rights and obligations. It underscores the critical need for a robust regulatory framework to support its effective application and growth. Future enhancements, such as allowing appeals against government compensation determinations through judicial review, could bolster acceptance and ensure the sustainability of this concept.
Keywords:
Compulsory License, Intellectual Property Rights, Government, ProspectsReferences
, Agreement Between The World Intellectual Property Organization and The World Trade Organization (1995): Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement )( 1994), Provisions L Mentioned in the TRIPs Agreement of the Paris Convention (1967), the Berne Convention (1971), the Treaty on Intellectual Property in Respect of UIntegrated Circuits (1989), the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT 1994 ), and the WTO Disputes Settlement Understanding (1994), WIPO Publication No.223 (E), Geneve.
American Bar Association, Section of Antitrust Law, 2000, Intellectual Property Misuse : Licensing and Litigation, ABA Printed in the USA.
Atmaja, Yustisiana Susila, Budi Santoso, and Irawati Irawati. “Pelindungan Hukum Terhadap Paten Produk Farmasi Atas Pelaksanaan Paten Oleh Pemerintah (Government Use).” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 50, no. 2 (2021): 196–208.
Bainbridge, David A, 1996, Intellectual Property, Pitman Publishing, London-Hong Kong-Johannesburg-Melbourne-Singapore-Washington DC.
Cottier, Thomas & Mavroidis, Peter C, 2003, Intellectual Property: Trade, Competition, and Sustainable Development, World Trade Forum, Vol 3, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Darusman, Yoyon M. "Kedudukan Serta Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Paten dalam Kerangka Hukum Nasional Indonesia dan Hukum Internasional." Yustisia 5, no. 1 (2016): 202-215.
Dewi, Niken Sari, and Suteki Suteki. "Obstruksi Pelaksanaan Lisensi Wajib Paten Dalam Rangka Alih Teknologi Pada Perusahaan Farmasi Di Indonesia." Law Reform 13, no. 1 (2017): 1-17
Hafiz Surahman. “Mengenal Dolutegravir Obat Antiretroviral Yang Menjadi Pilihan Utama Pengobatan Pasien HIV Saat Ini.” Kemenkes Direktorat Jenderal Pelayanan Kesehatan, 2022. https://yankes.kemkes.go.id/view_artikel/87/mengenal-dolutegravir-obat-antiretroviral-yang-menjadi-pilihan-utama-pengobatan-pasien-hiv-saat-ini.
Hanoraga, Tony, and Niken Prasetyawati. "Lisensi wajib paten sebagai salah satu wujud pembatasan hak eksklusif paten." JURNAL SOSIAL HUMANIORA (JSH) 8, no. 2 (2015): 160-180.
Matompo, Osgar Sahim. "Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Atas Pembajakan Di Indonesia." Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 1 (2020): 104-114.
Muis, Lidya Shery. "Hak Atas Aksesibilitas Obat Paten Bagi Masyarakat." Widya Pranata Hukum: Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum 1, no. 1 (2019): 36-64.
Mustafa, Marni Emmy, and M H SH. Prinsip-Prinsip Beracara Dalam Penegakan Hukum Paten Di Indonesia, Dikaitkan Dengan TRIP’s-WTO. Penerbit Alumni, 2022.
Rohma, Mila Riskiatul, Ahmad Zamzami, Herlinda Putri Utami, Hani Adelia Karsyam, and Desy Cahya Widianingrum. “Kasus Penyakit Mulut Dan Kuku Di Indonesia: Epidemiologi, Diagnosis Penyakit, Angka Kejadian, Dampak Penyakit, Dan Pengendalian.” In Conference of Applied Animal Science Proceeding Series, 3:15–22, 2022.
Section of Antitrust Law, 1996, The 1995 Federal Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property, Commentary and T'ext, ABA Printed in the USA
Simatupang, Taufik H. "Hak Asasi Manusia dan Perlindungan Kekayaan Intelektual dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum." Jurnal Ham 12, no. 1 (2021): 111-122.
Sinaga, Niru Anita. "Pentingnya Perlindungan Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual Bagi Pembangunan Ekonomi Indonesia." Jurnal Hukum Sasana 6, no. 2 (2020).
Sulasno, Sulasno. "Lisensi Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (Hki) Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perjanjian Di Indonesia." ADIL: Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 2 (2012): 352-352UPOV. Union Internationale pour la Protection des Obtentions Vegetales / International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, UPOV Publication. 1991. No. 221. (E)
Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, WIPO Publication No.201 (E), Geneve. 1979.
WIPO Model Law for Developing Countries on Invention, Patents, WIPO Publication. Vol.1 1989, p. 840(E)
Wolfhard, Eric, 1991, International Trade in Intellectual Property : The Emerging GATT Regime, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law Review, Vol 49 Winter.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2024 the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.