Identifying the Prophetic Legal Ethos in the Death Penalty Provisions of the Indonesian Criminal Code
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v18no3.3639Abstract
Amid the ongoing controversy surrounding the drafting process of the Indonesian Criminal Code, particularly with respect to the provisions on the death penalty, this study seeks to explore the ethos or spirit of prophetic law through a philosophical examination of these regulations. This research employs a normative legal methodology, utilizing both statutory and conceptual approaches. The concepts of humanization, liberation, and transcendence serve as foundational elements of the philosophical framework of prophetic law, which coherently and sequentially aligns with the structures of ontology, epistemology, and axiology. These concepts are employed as benchmarks to identify the prophetic legal ethos embedded within the death penalty provisions of the Indonesian Criminal Code. Essentially, the arrangements pertaining to the death penalty are positioned as instruments for societal education. If a convict sentenced to death demonstrates genuine remorse and makes efforts toward rehabilitation, the imposition of the death penalty may be reconsidered in favor of life imprisonment. This perspective aligns with the principles articulated in QS. Al Maidah (5:38–39), which emphasize that punishment is intended for self-improvement. Should the convict exhibit remorse prior to execution, it reflects the understanding that Allah is the Most Forgiving. This approach underscores a legal philosophy that prioritizes the substantive and soulful dimensions of law, rooted in the prophetic legal ethos of humanization, liberation, and transcendence.
Keywords:
Death Penalty, Indonesian Criminal Code, Prophetic LawReferences
Absori, Kelik Wardio, and Saepul Rochman. Paradigma Hukum Profetik; Kritik Atas Paradigma Hukum Non-Sistematik. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2019.
Albert Aries. Hukum Pidana Indonesia Menurut KUHP Lama & KUHP Baru Dilengkapi Dengan Asas, Yurisprudensi & Postulat Latin. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2024.
Anugrah, Roby, and Raja Desril. “Kebijakan Formulasi Pidana Mati Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 3, no. 1 (January 30, 2021): 80–95.
Ash-shidiqqi, Ellectrananda Anugerah. “Meneropong Ilmu Hukum Profetik: Penegakan Hukum Yang Berketuhanan.” Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 1 (February 24, 2020): 33–42. https://doi.org/10.37729/amnesti.v2i1.701.
Bakhri, Syaiful. Perkembangan Stelsel Pidana Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Total Media, 2009.
Barda Nawawi Arief. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2013.
Briando, Bobby, and Agung Sulistyo Purnomo. “Etika Profetik Bagi Pengelola Keuangan Negara.” Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma 10, no. 2 (August 31, 2019): 342–64. https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2019.08.10020.
“Darmawan - Pro Dan Kontra Pidana Mati.Pdf.” Accessed January 29, 2024. https://www.unpak.ac.id/pdf/pro_kontra.pdf.
Daulay, Royyan Mahmuda Al’Arisyi. “Analisis Nilai-Nilai Politik Profetik Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tentang Pemasyarakatan.” An-Natiq Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner 3, no. 1 (April 4, 2023): 42–53. https://doi.org/an-natiq.v2i2.55744.
Eddy O.S Hiariej. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana Edisi Penyesuaian KUHP Nasional. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2024.
Kuntowijoyo. Islam Sebagai Ilmu, Epistemologi, Metodologi, Dan Etika. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana, 2006.
Luong, Hai Thanh. “Why Vietnam Continues to Impose the Death Penalty for Drug Offences: A Narrative Commentary.” International Journal of Drug Policy 88 (February 1, 2021): 103043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.103043.
Manoppo, Gabrielle Aldy, Jolly K. Pongoh, and Grace Yurico Bawole. “Analisis Pidana Mati Berdasarkan Pasal 100 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.” Lex Administratum 12, no. 1 (September 25, 2023). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/administratum/article/view/51527.
Michelle Miao. “Two Years between Life and Death: A Critical Analysis of the Suspended Death Penalty in China.” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 45 (June 1, 2016): 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2015.10.003.
“M.Syamsudin_Pidato-Pengukuhan.Pdf.” Accessed January 29, 2024. https://www.uii.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/M.Syamsudin_Pidato-Pengukuhan.pdf.
Muhamad, Marchell Nabil. “Transformasi Pidana Mati Dalam Kitab Undang - Undang Hukum Pidana Baru.” Jurnal Mahasiswa Indonesia 1, no. 01 (July 14, 2023). https://journal.pusatpenelitian.com/index.php/jmi/article/view/77.
Muntafa, Parhan, and Ade Mahmud. “Penerapan Hukum Pidana Mati Bersyarat Dalam KUHP Baru Di Hubungkan Dengan Asas Kepastian Hukum.” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 4, no. 2 (June 13, 2023): 130–36. https://doi.org/10.55637/jph.4.2.6918.130-136.
Roby Anugrah and Raja Desril. “Kebijakan Formulasi Pidana Mati Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 3, no. 1 (January 30, 2021): 80–95. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i1.80-95.
Shidarta. “Hukum Profetik: Antara Humanisasi, Liberasi, Dan Tarnsendensi.” Binus University, May 2019. https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2019/05/02/antara_humanisasi_liberasi_transendensi/.
Sitanggang, Djernih. Kepastian Hukum Masa Tunggu Eksekusi Pidana Mati Dalam Mewujudkan Rasa Keadilan Menuju Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Pustaka Reka Cipta, 2021.
Supriyadi. “Kebijakan Penanganan Covid-19 Dari Perspektif Hukum Profetik.” Suloh:Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh 8, no. 2 (November 9, 2020): 91–109. https://doi.org/10.29103/sjp.v8i2.3069.
Syamsudin, M. Ilmu Hukum Profetik: Gagasan Awal, Landasan Kefilsafatan, Dan Kemungkinan Pengembangannya Di Era Postmodern. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2013.
Topo Santoso. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2023.
“Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana,” n.d.
Widayati, Lidya Suryani. “Pidana Mati Dalam RUU KUHP: Perlukan Diatur Sebagai Pidana Yang Bersifat Khusus?” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan 7, no. 2 (2016).
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2024 the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.