Problematics of the Execution of Religious Court Decisions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v19no3.4172Abstract
This article examines the problem of authority in the execution of Religious Court decisions in Indonesia and its impact on the effectiveness of Islamic law. Although Religious Courts are authorized to adjudicate family and sharia economic cases, enforcement still relies on District Courts, creating dissonance between legal norms and practice. Using a juridical-sociological qualitative approach with literature studies and interviews with two judges, one clerk, and two execution applicants, the study identifies three root problems: the absence of direct execution authority, weak cross-agency coordination, and the lack of standard operational procedures. These weaknesses disproportionately affect women and children, leaving many rulings unenforced. The article recommends regulatory reform and institutional strengthening of Religious Courts, drawing comparative insights from Malaysia and Pakistan, where religious courts have clearer enforcement mechanisms.
Keywords:
Religious Justice, Execution of Judgments, Problematics of Authority, Islamic Law, Substantive JusticeReferences
Ahmad Rusyaid Idris, Muhammad Khusaini, Syaiful Anwar Al-Mansyuri. “Contemporary Islamic Law in Indonesia: The Fulfillment of Child Custody Rights in Divorce Cases Caused by Early Marriage.” MILRev: Metro Islmaic Law Review 3, no. 1 (2024): 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v3i1.8907.
Alam, Syariful, Happy David Pradhan, Syariful Alam, Nu’man Aunuh, Muhammad Luthfi, Yaris Adhial Fajrin, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, and Merve Ozkan Borsa. “E-Court Effectiveness of Religious Courts in Indonesia.” Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah 590, no. 2 (2021): 92–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211102.174.
Arbani, Tri Suhendra. “Kekuatan Eksekusi Putusan Peradilan Agama Terhadap Kewajiban Ayah Menafkahi Anak Pasca Perceraian.” Jurnal Al-Qadau 7, no. 2 (2020): 30–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/al-qadau.v7i2.16515.
Asmaret, Desi, Alaiddin Koto, and Afrizal. “TRANSFORMASI HUKUM KELUARGA ISLAM DI INDONESIA Telaah Pemikiran Rifyal Ka’bah.” Al-Ahwal 12, no. 2 (2019): 145–60. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2019.12203.
Astuti, Putri Widi, and Tri Prastio. “Post-Divorce Rights of Women and Children.” MILRev : Metro Islamic Law Review 1, no. 2 (2022): 203. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v1i2.6209.
Aurellia, Meivanza Dwi, and Abdul Halim. “Urgensi Pembentukan Lembaga Eksekutor Terhadap Pemenuhan Hak Perempuan Dan Anak Pasca Perceraian.” JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 2023. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i2.7270.
Azani, Muhammad Azani, and Cysillia Anggaraini Novalis Cysillia. “PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA MENGENAI PEMENUHAN HAK NAFKAH ANAK PASCA PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA PEKANBARU.” Jotika Research in Business Law, 2022. https://doi.org/10.56445/jrbl.v1i2.43.
B, Mr. “Personal Interview.” 2025.
Benjamin Schonthal, Tamir Moustafa, Matthew J Nelson, Shylashri Shankar. “Is the Rule of Law an Antidote for Religious Tension? The Promise and Peril of Judicializing Religious Freedom.” American Behavioral Scientist 60, no. 8 (2016): 966-986. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215613380.
Binti Zulfahrizal, Farah Nabilah, and Sudirman Suparmin. “Konflik Perundangan Hak Hadhanah Bagi Ibu Non-Muslim Di Malaysia.” Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) 6, no. 1 (2023): 418–26. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v6i1.1863.
Bornstein, Brian H., Monica K. Miller. “Does a Judge’s Religion Influence Decision Making?” Ct.Rev., 2024.
Darmawan, Darmawan, Suhaimi Suhaimi, Muhammad Natsir, T. Rasyidin, and Mustakim Mustakim. “Relative Competence of the Sharia Court: Talaq Divorce Lawsuit and Protection of Women’s Rights.” Samarah 7, no. 1 (2023): 84–100. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i1.16053.
Dheni Setiawan, Marnia Rani, Pery Rehendra Sucipta. “Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tentang Hak Nafkah Anak (Studi Di Pengadilan Agama Tanjungpinang.” Student Online Journal (SOJ) 1, no. 2 (2020): 659–71. http://repositori.umrah.ac.id/id/eprint/1638.
Fachri, Ferinda K. “Amran Suadi Gagas Sistem Interkoneksi, Solusi Pelaksanaan Putusan Perceraian.” Hukum Online, 2022.
Fadil, Zidna Mazidah, and Zaenul Mahmudi. “Fulfillment of Women’s Rights After Divorce: Dynamics and Transformation in the Legal Journey.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah 16, no. 1 (2024): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v16i1.25713.
Fakhrudin, Muhamad, Muhammad Nasir, and Nandang Akhmad Kosasih. “Understanding the Complexity of Executions in Religious Courts : Between Legal Mandates and Field Realities.” International Journal of As Suadi: Law and Sharia Review 1, no. 1 (2024): 67–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.70691/assuadi.v1i1.5.
Khan, Hanna Ambaras, Nora Abdul Hak, Najibah Mohd Zin, and Roslina Che Soh. “The Challenges in Enforcing Post Divorce Orders of Native Courts in East Malaysia.” IIUM Law Journal 29, no. S1 (2021): 17–35. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v29iS1.633.
Khisni, Akhmad, and I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani. “The Transformation of Islamic Law Into the National Legislation.” Talent Development & Excellence 12, no. 2 (2020): 1275–81. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=s3h&AN=143587803&lang=ja&site=ehost-live.
Lahilote, Hasyim Sofyan, A. A. Miftah, Yuliatin, and Rahmi Hidayati. “Judge’S Dilemma in Marriage Dispensation in the Religious Court.” Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan 22, no. 1 (2022): 52–60. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v22i1.979.
Mr. S. “Personal Interview.” 2025.
Mrs.SN. Personal Interview. (the Power of Execution) On February 21st., 2025.
Mrs.Yk. “Personal Interview.” 2024.
Nasution, Khoiruddin, and Syamruddin Nasution. “Implementation of Indonesian Islamic Family Law To Guarantee Children’S Rights.” Al-Jami’ah 59, no. 2 (2021): 347–74. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2021.592.347-374.
Nurlaelawati, Euis. “The Legal Fate of Indonesian Muslim Women in Court Divorce and Child Custody.” In Religion, Law and Intolerance in Indonesia, 353–68. London: Routledge, 2016.
S, Mrs. “Personal Interview.” 2025.
Suadi, Amran. “Judicial Authority and the Role of the Religious Courts in the Settlement of Sharia Economic Disputes.” Lex Publica 7, no. 2 (2020): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.58829/lp.7.2.2020.1-14.
Suadi, Amran. “The Role of Religious Court in Islamic Law Reform in Indonesia.” Asy-Syari’ah 21, no. 2 (2020): 125–34. https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v21i2.5821.
Suadi, Amran, Mardi Candra, Fahadil Amin Al Hasan, and Gugun Gumilar. “Legal Protection of Women’s and Children’s Rights after Divorce through the E-MOSI CAPER App.” Jurnal Hukum Novelty 15, no. 1 (2024): 35–52. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v15i1.a27347.
Sujayadi, Sujayadi, Tata Wijayanta, and Herliana Herliana. “Regulating Court Jurisdiction to Protect Weaker Parties: An Overview of the Indonesian Civil Justice System.” Yuridika 38, no. 2 (2023): 305–32. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i2.43835.
Sundari, Elisabeth, and Anny Retnowati. “The Weakness of The Control for Fighting Corruption in The Judical Process: The Case of Indonesia.” International Journal of Social Policy and Law (IJOSPL) 02, no. 01 (2021): 93–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.8888/ijospl.v2i1.35.
Urus, Nur Sarah Tajul, Md. Amin Abdul Rahman Al-Jarumi, Mohd Syahmil Samsudin, and Mus’ab Yusoff. “Hisbah (Ombudsmen) Is A Mechanism for Resolving Enforcement Issues in Malaysia: Changes and Difficulties.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 12, no. 1 (2022): 1933–41. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i1/12256.
Wildani Hefni, Imam Mustofa, Rizqa Ahm. “Looking for Moderate Fiqh: The Thought of Mohammad Hashim Kamali on the Reformation of Rigidity and Inflexibility in Islamic Law.” Al Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 10, no. 1 (2025): 30–57. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v10i1.10694.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2025 the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung.
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






