Implementation of Double Track System in Conviction Towards Special Expertise Crime

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v2i1.2152

Abstract

Sentencing must be guided by the principle of quae sunt minoris culpae sunt majoris infamiae (cruel crimes will be punished with cruel punishment). However, there must be a limit to the punishment (poenae sunt restringenade). In its implementation, the imposition of crimes against convicted people often creates ongoing problems in people's lives. Instead of aiming to popularize the convicts, in fact the imposition of crimes often causes suffering to the perpetrator and even his family. This study aims to determine the basis for justifying the imposition of sanctions in the punishment of criminals with special skills and to formulate the ideal concept of punishment for convicts with special skills in the future. This research is a normative legal research; the data source in this study uses secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The approach in this research uses a statutory approach, a comparative approach and a conceptual approach. Based on the results of the study, it shows that the basis for justifying the imposition of sanctions for criminal acts with special expertise is the Mark system of penalties. The use of the Double Track System in the punishment of convicts who have special expertise in the field of science so that it is in line with the criminal purpose of providing education, in addition to being convicted with the main crime, the convict is also subject to acts in the form of social work by teaching/transforming the knowledge/expertise possessed to people, many through certain educational/research institution/institutions online (on line).

Keywords:

Doubel Tract System, Criminalization, Convicted, Special Skills

References

Arief, Barda Nawawi. 2008. Bunga rampai kebijakan hukum pidana: perkembangan penyusunan konsep KUHP baru. Ed. 1. cet. 1. Rawamangun, Jakarta: Kencana.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. 2011. Perkembangan sistem pemidanaan di Indonesia. Cet. 3. Semarang: Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Pascasarjana Undip.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. 2011. Tujuan dan pedoman pemidanaan: perspektif pembaharuan hukum pidana dan perbandingan beberapa negara. Cet. 3. Semarang: Pustaka Magister, 2011.

Hiariej, Eddy O. S. 2016. Prinsip-prinsip hukum pidana. Edisi revisi. Yogyakarta: Cahaya AtmaPustaka,

Marpaung, Leden. 2005. Asas-Asas Teori Praktik Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

P.A.F Lamintang, dan Theo Lamintang. 2012. Hukum Penitensier Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Raveers, Matt. 2000. Justice and Punishment, The Rationale Of Coercion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gie, the Liang. 2002. Teori-Teori Keadilan, Yogyakarta: Sumber Sukses.

Mertha, I Ketut.2014. Efek Jera Pemiskinan Koruptor Dan Sanksi Pidana, Bali: Udayana University Press.

Hamzah, Andi.2008. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Aryana, I Wayan Putu Sucana. “EFEKTIVITAS PIDANA PENJARA DALAM MEMBINA NARAPIDANA.” DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 11, no. 21 (October 1, 2015). https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v11i21.446.

Azhar, Ahmad Faizal, and Eko Soponyono. “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Pengaturan Dan Penanggulangan Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech) Di Media Sosial.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 2, no. 2 (May 10, 2020): 275–90. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i2.275-290.

Candra, Septa. “Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana; Konsep Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dalam Hukum Pidana Nasional Yang Akan Datang.” JURNAL CITA HUKUM 1, no. 1 (June 4, 2013): 95895. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v1i1.2979.

Gunarto, Marcus Priyo. “Sikap Memidana Yang Berorientasi Pada Tujuan Pemidanaan.” Jurnal Mimbar Hukum 21, no. 1 (2012): 93–108. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16248.

Haryono, Haryono. “KEBIJAKAN PERLAKUAN KHUSUS TERHADAP NARAPIDANA RISIKO TINGGI DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN (STUDI KASUS DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN KLS III GN. SINDUR) .” Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 11, no. 03 (November 22, 2017): 231–47. https://doi.org/10.30641/KEBIJAKAN.2017.V11.231-247.

Jasmi, Putri Conitatillah. “ANALISIS IMPLEMENTASI ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM DALAM PROSES PUTUSAN HAKIM TERKAIT PENGHINAAN MELALUI DUNIA MAYA.” Jurnal Analisis Hukum 3, no. 1 (September 27, 2020): 82. https://doi.org/10.38043/jah.v3i1.2684.

Kholiq, Abdul, Barda Nawawi Arief, and Eko Soponyono. “PIDANA PENJARA TERBATAS : SEBUAH GAGASAN DAN REORIENTASI TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN FORMULASI JENIS SANKSI HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA.” LAW REFORM 11, no. 1 (March 31, 2015): 100. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v11i1.15759.

Maerani, Ira Alia. “Implementasi Ide Keseimbangan Dalam Pembangunan Hukum Pidana Indonesia Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Pancasila.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum. Vol. 3. Mei-Agustus, 2015. https://doi.org/10.26532/JPH.V3I3.1364.

Mahmud, Ade. “Problematika Asset Recovery Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara (Ade Mahmud).” Jurnal Yudisial 11, no. 3 (December 26, 2018): 347–66. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v11i3.262.

Ngurah Oka Yudistira Darmadi, AA. “Konsep Pembaharuan Pemidanaan Dalam Rancangan KUHP.” Ocs.Unud.Ac.Id 02, no. 02 (2013). https://ocs.unud.ac.id/index.php/jmhu/article/download/5935/4423.

Perdana, Cipi. “Rekonstruksi Pemidanaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Terorisme Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 23, no. 4 (2016): 672–700. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol23.iss4.art8.

Purwadiyanto, Taufan. “ANALISIS PIDANA KERJA SOSIAL DALAM HUKUM POSITIF DI INDONESIA.” LEX ADMINISTRATUM. Vol. 3, November 11, 2015. http://repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/123456789/18372.

Situmorang, Mosgan. “HARMONISASI HUKUM NASIONAL DI BIDANG KORUPSI DENGAN UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 3, no. 3 (December 31, 2014): 329. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v3i3.29.

Walukow, Julita Melissa. “PERWUJUDAN PRINSIP EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW BAGI NARAPIDANA DI DALAM LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN DI INDONESIA 1.” LEX ET SOCIETATIS. Vol. 1, March 31, 2013. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexetsocietatis/article/view/1320.

Widyati, Lidya Suryani. “TINDAK PIDANA PENGHINAAN TERHADAP PRESIDEN ATAU WAKIL PRESIDEN: PERLUKAH DIATUR KEMBALI DALAM KUHP? (DEFAMATION AGAINST THE PRESIDENT OR VICE PRESIDENT: SHOULD IT BE REGULATED IN THE CRIMINAL CODE?).” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan 8, no. 2 (November 1, 2017): 215–34. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v8i2.1067.

BPHN. "Academic Manuscripts of the Criminal Code Bill." Jakarta, 2015.

"Draft Criminal Code." Jakarta, September 2019.

"The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia." Paragraph IV Preamble, 1945.

"Law Number 1 of 1946 concerning Criminal Law Regulations."Criminal Code (KUHP), 1946.

"Law Number 12 of 1995 concerning Corrections." STATE GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA OF 1995 NUMBER 77, SUPPLEMENT TO THE STATE GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 3614, 1995." Law Number 20 of 1946" Concerning Imprisonment, Yogyakarta, 1946

"Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 3 of 2018" concerning Terms and Conditions Procedures for granting remissions, assimilation, leave to visit family, parole, leave before release, and parole. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia No. 282 of 2018.

Gabrillin, Abba. “KPK Tak Temukan Bukti Penerima di Kasus Suap PT Brantas Abipraya.” Diakses 20 April 2020. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2016/10/27/17315241/kpk.tak.temukan.bukti.peneri ma.di.kasus.suap.pt.brantas.abipraya.

ICJR. “Perlakuan Tidak Manusiawi Petugas Lapas Harus Jadi Momentum Reformasi Kebijakan Pidana Lapas termasuk soal Reformasi Kebijakan Narkotika.” Diakses 20 April 2020. https://icjr.or.id/perlakuan-tidak-manusiawi-petugas-lapas-harus-jadi- momentum-reformasi-kebijakan-pidana-lapas-termasuk-soal-reformasi-kebijakan- narkotika/.

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI) Kamus versi online/daring (dalam jaringan).” Dalam “Keahlian.” Diakses 19 Maret 2020. Https://Kbbi.Web.Id/Keahlian.

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI Kamus versi online/daring (dalam jaringan)."Dalam“khusus”, diakses 19 Maret 2020, Https://Kbbi.Web.Id/Khusus

“Putusan Pengadilan Nomor: 219/PK/Pid.Sus/2018,” 2018.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Total Abstract Views: 18 | Total Downloads: 12

Downloads

Authors

  • Ahmad Aditya Putra Utama Faculty of law Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Feteran Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Heru Suyanto Faculty of Law, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta , Indonesia

Published

2021-03-17

Issue

Section

Artikel

Author Biography

Ahmad Aditya Putra Utama, Faculty of law Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Feteran Jakarta

Students of Faculty Of Law Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta