The Legal Position Of Electronic Medical Recording As An Evidence At The Court

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v2i1.2209

Abstract

This research aimed to analyze the position of electronic medical records and as evidence in court. The research method uses a normative juridical approach. To obtain an overview of electronic medical records as evidence in court, the legal materials collected are qualitative data. Any electronic evidence can be used as evidence if it meets formal and material requirements, as regulated in Article 5 paragraph (4) of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law). Electronic medical records have an essential role in health services and law enforcement efforts as evidence. Based on this, the main problem is the position of electronic medical records as valid evidence in court. The results show that the position of electronic medical records as evidence in court can be valid evidence following Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), The Ministry of Health Regulation 269/2008 Articles 5 and 1, Article 51 of Government Regulation No. 71 Years. As evidence, electronic medical records do not have binding evidentiary power but rather have independent evidentiary value, namely, proof determined by the judge's conviction without being limited by law.

Keywords:

Electronic, medical, records, evidence

References

Boy S. Sabarguna, (2008), Rekam Medis Terkomputerisasi, Jakarta: UI Press.

Josua Sitompul, (2012). Cyberspace, Cybercrime, Cyberlaw, Jakarta: Tatanusa

R. Soepomo, (2004), Hukum Acara Perdata Pengadilan Negeri, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

Salim HS, (2016), Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Disertasi dan Tesis, Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Zaeni Asyhadie, (2017). Aspek-Aspek Hukum Kesehatan Di Indonesia, Depok; Rajawali Pers.

Fakhriah, Efa Laela. “PERKEMBANGAN ALAT BUKTI DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PERDATA DI PENGADILAN MENUJU PEMBARUAN HUKUM ACARA PERDATA.” ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata 1, no. 2 (September 16, 2015): 135–153. https://doi.org/10.36913/JHAPER.V1I2.16.

Harizona, Darus. “Kekuatan Bukti Elektronik Sebagai Bukti Di Pengadilan Menurut Hukum Acara Pidana Dan Hukum Islam (Penggunaan Rekaman Gambar Closed Circuit Television).” Jurnal Intelektualita: Keislaman, Sosial Dan Sains 7, no. 1 (July 10, 2018): 81–98. https://doi.org/10.19109/intelektualita.v7i1.2342.

Juanda, Enju. “KEKUATAN ALAT BUKTI DALAM PERKARA PERDATA MENURUT HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA.” Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi 4, no. 1 (March 1, 2016): 27. https://doi.org/10.25157/jigj.v4i1.409.

Kartika, Pandoe Pramoe. “Data Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Yang Sah Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law 1, no. 1 (May 24, 2019): 33–46. https://doi.org/10.31960/ijocl.v1i1.146.

Luntungan, Geraldo Angelo. “SURAT SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI MENURUT KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA.” LEX CRIMEN. Vol. 7, July 26, 2018. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/20542.

Manurung, Soni Praja, Ismail Ismail, and Salim Fauzi Lubis. “PENGATURAN HUKUM REKAM MEDIS SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DI PERSIDANGAN.” JURNAL PIONIR 5, no. 4 (November 22, 2019). http://www.jurnal.una.ac.id/index.php/pionir/article/view/914.

Murniati, Lucia, Endang Wahyati Y, and Siswo Putranto Santoso. “IMPLEMENTASI HOSPITAL BYLAWS DI RUMAH SAKIT SANTO ANTONIO BATURAJA SETELAH BERLAKUNYA PERMENKES NOMOR: 755/MenKes/Per/IV/2011 TENTANG PENYELENGGARAAN KOMITE MEDIK DI RUMAH SAKIT.” SOEPRA 2, no. 2 (January 10, 2017): 143. https://doi.org/10.24167/shk.v2i2.817.

Octarina, Nynda Fatmawati, Muh. Barid Nizaruddin Wajdi, M. Ikhsan Setiawan, Agus Sukoco, Tubagus Purworusmiardi, and Nuning Kurniasih. “Tinjauan Terhadap UU ITE Untuk Penerapan Rekam Medis Berbasis Online Pada Penduduk Muslim Di Indonesia.” At-Tahdzib: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Muamalah 5, no. 2 (2017): 78–94. http://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/mataraman/index.php/tahdzib/article/view/3253.

Palit, Richard Cisanto. “KEKUATAN AKTA DI BAWAH TANGAN SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DI PENGADILAN.” LEX PRIVATUM. Vol. 3, May 4, 2015. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/7842.

Raharja, Ivan Fauzani. “PENEGAKAN HUKUM SANKSI ADMINISTRASI TERHADAP PELANGGARAN PERIZINAN.” INOVATIF. Vol. 7, 2014. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/jimih/article/view/2064.

Rusyadi, I. “KEKUATAN ALAT BUKTI DALAM PERSIDANGAN PERKARA PIDANA.” Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS. Vol. 5, February 13, 2016. https://trijurnal.lemlit.trisakti.ac.id/prioris/article/view/558.

Samandari, Nabil Atta, Wila Chandrawila S, and Agus H. Rahim. “KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN REKAM MEDIS KONVENSIONAL DAN ELEKTRONIK.” SOEPRA 2, no. 2 (January 10, 2017): 154. https://doi.org/10.24167/shk.v2i2.818.

Simbolon, Suzeth Agustien. “KAJIAN YURIDIS TERHADAP KEDUDUKAN REKAM MEDIS ELEKTRONIK DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PIDANA MALPRAKTEK OLEH DOKTER.” LEX CRIMEN. Vol. 4, November 3, 2015. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/9803.

Sudjana, Sudjana. “Aspek Hukum Rekam Medis Atau Rekam Medis Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Transaksi Teurapetik.” Veritas et Justitia 3, no. 2 (December 26, 2017): 359–83. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.2685.

Wahyudi, Johan. “DOKUMEN ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI PADA PEMBUKTIAN DI PENGADILAN.” Perspektif 17, no. 2 (May 27, 2012): 118–26. http://jurnal-perspektif.org/index.php/perspektif/article/view/101.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Total Abstract Views: 1 | Total Downloads: 5

Downloads

Authors

  • Dwi Retno Wulandari RSUD Jendral Ahmad Yani Metro, Indonesia

Published

2021-03-17

Issue

Section

Artikel

Author Biography

Dwi Retno Wulandari, RSUD Jendral Ahmad Yani Metro

perekam medis di RSUD Jend. A. Yani Kota Metro Lampung