Trial Proving in Electronic Criminal Case Trial Based On the Dignified Justice Perspective

Novritsar Hasintongan  Pakpahan; Teguh  Prasetyo; Erny Herlin  Setyorini; Yovita Arie  Mangesti

doi:10.25041/ip.v3i1.2452

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v3i1.2452

Abstract

Trial proving in Indonesia has always been limited to Criminal Procedural Law and other regulations. Following the recent development of electronic criminal case trials, there has not been any precise regulation aside from Supreme Court Regulation 4 of 2020. The contradiction between KUHAP and Supreme Court Regulation causes problems, especially regarding trial proving. The purpose of the paper is to provide a legal solution to the problem of the legal emptiness regarding the regulation of trial proving in electronic criminal case trials from the perspective of Dignified Justice that will provide advantageous, responsive, and adaptive justice towards the needs of the community. The methodology of this research is based on normative research. The normative research methods used in this research are the statute, normative, and comparative approaches. The result shown there shouldn't be a conflict between the effect of KUHAP and Supreme Court Regulation. Yet, the regulation of trial proving in an electronic criminal trial should be regulated at a statute level.

Keywords:

Code Of Criminal Procedure, Dignified Justice, Electronic Criminal Case Trial, Supreme Court Regulation, Trial Proving

References

Alfitra. Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Beracara Pidana, Perdata, Dan Korupsi Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Penebar Swadaya Group, 2002.

Arsyad Sanusi, H.M., and Syaiful Watni. Analisis Dan Evaluasi Hukum Tentang Pemanfaatan Media Elektronika (Teleconference) Untuk Pembuktian Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: BPHN, 2003.

From Digitisation to Digital Transformation A Case for Online Courts in Commercial Disputes.” European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. London, 2019.

Hamzah, Andi. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008.

Harahap, M. Yahya. Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, Dan Peninjauan Kembali. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2003.

Imron, Ali, and Muhammad Iqbal. Hukum Pembuktian. Banten: Unipam Press, 2019.

Kelsen, Hans. Teori Umum Tentang Hukum Dan Negara. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2010.

Muhammad, Rusli. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Dilengkapi Dengan 4 Undang-Undang Di Bidang Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2011.

Prasetyo, Teguh. Keadilan Bermartabat: Perspektif Teori Hukum. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2015.

———. Pembaharuan Hukum Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat. Malang: Setara Press, 2017

Sasangka, Hari, and Lily Rosita. Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2003.

Syahuri, Taufiqurrohman. Hukum Konstitusi: Proses Dan Prosedur Perubahan UUD Di Indonesia 1945- 2002 Serta Perbandingannya Dengan Konstitusi Negara Lain Di Dunia. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2004.

Adisti, Neisa Angrum, Nashriana Nashriana, Isma Murilah, and Alfiyan Mardiansyah. “Pelaksanaan Persidangan Perkara Pidana Secara Elektronik Pada Masa Pandemi Covid 19 Di Pengadilan Negeri Kota Palembang.” Legislasi Indonesia 18, no. 2 (2021): 222–32. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v18i2.768.

Arnita, I Nyoman. “Perlindungan Hak-Hak Tersangka Dalam Penahanan Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hak Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal Hukum UNSRAT Vol.XXI, no. No.3/April-Juni (2013): 44.

Atamimi, Hafidlatul Waro. “Keabsahan Hasil Pemeriksaan Saksi Melalui Teleconference Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19.” Jurnal Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember, 2021, 9.

Darma, I Made Wirya. “Kelemahan Yuridis Formal Pelaksanaan Persidangan Pidana Melalui Teleconference Saat Pandemi Covid-19.” DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 17, no. 2 (2021): 204–14. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v17i2.5179.

Donnelly, Jack. “Human Rights, and Human Dignity: An Analytic Critique of Non-Western Conceptions of Human Rights.” The American Political Science Review 76, no. 2 (1982): 303–16.

Fahamsyah, Ermanto, and Fradhana Putra Disantara. “The Dignified Justice Perspective on the Enigma of Health Protocols COVID-19 as a Code of Ethics.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 9, no. 1 (2022): 1–15.

Donnelly, Jack. “Human Rights, and Human Dignity: An Analytic Critique of Non-Western Conceptions of Human Rights.” The American Political Science Review 76, no. 2 (1982): 303–16.

Fahamsyah, Ermanto, and Fradhana Putra Disantara. “The Dignified Justice Perspective on the Enigma of Health Protocols COVID-19 as a Code of Ethics.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 9, no. 1 (2022): 1–15.

Leonard, Tommy, Elvira Fitriyani Pakpahan, Heriyanti Heriyanti, and Azharuddin Azharuddin. “Legal Protection Against a Bond Investor According To the Dignified Justice.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 9, no. 1 (2020): 152. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v9i1.37818.

Mokorimban, Drake Allan. “Perlindungan Terhadap Saksi Dalam Proses Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia.” Lex Crimen 2, no. 1 (2013): 47.

Nalle, Victor Emanuel W. “The Relevance of Socio-Legal Studies in Legal Science.” Mimbar Hukum 27, no. 1 (2015): 179–92. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.15905.

Payandeh, Mehrdad. “The Concept of International Law in the Jurisprudence of PG.L.A. Hart.” European Journal of International Law 21, no. 4 (2010): 970.

Riyanto, Benny. “National Law Development in New Normal Era.” Indonesian Law Journal 13, no. 2 (2020): 87–107. https://doi.org/10.33331/ilj.v13i2.33.

Stoykova, Radina. “Digital Evidence: Unaddressed Threats to Fairness and the Presumption of Innocence.” Computer Law and Security Review 42 (2021): 105575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105575.

Susilowati, Christina Maya Indah. “The Philosophy of Sentencing in Indonesia Based on Dignified Justice.” International Journal of Business, Economics, and Law 22, no. 1 (2015): 173–79.

Susskind, Richard. Online Courts and The Future of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press (OUP), 2019

Yunus, Nur Rohim, and Annissa Rezki. “Kebijakan Pemberlakuan Lock Down Sebagai Antisipasi Penyebaran Corona Virus Covid-19.” Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I 7, no. 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v7i3.15083.

Zorzetto, Silvia. “The Lex Specialis Principle and Its Uses in Legal Argumentation.” Eunomía. Revista En Cultura de La Legalidad, 2012, 62.

Law Number 8 the year 1981 concerning The Law of Criminal Procedure (The Law on the Code of Criminal Procedure)

Regulation of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 the Year 2020 regarding Administration and Trial of Criminal Cases in Electronic Court

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Wardhani, Anita K. “Sidang Jerinx Beberapa Kali Terhenti, Ada Gangguan Teknis, Suara Hakim Tak Terdengar Tim Kuasa Hukum.” Tribunnews, 2020. https://www.tribunnews.com/seleb/2020/10/06/sidang-jerinx-beberapa-kali-terhenti-ada-gangguan-teknis-suara-hakim-tak-terdengar-tim-kuasa-hukum?page=all.