Criminal Liability Policy Of Persons With Mental Disorders In Case Spreading Racial Issues

Alexandra Florecita Adja  Mossa

doi:10.25041/ip.v3i2.2727

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v3i2.2727

Abstract

Freedom of expression is stated in Article 28E of the 1945 Constitution. However, law enforcement obeys laws and norms that do not use the law as a source of law. This paper uses normative legal research method consisting of case approach and a statutory approach. Sources of data used are primary data obtained from interviews and secondary data obtained by collecting data contained in books, papers, journals, and print or electronic media. Laws and regulations relating to the existing problems are studied and analyzed, these are also legal materials. The data that has been obtained is then analyzed. The data analysis used is qualitative.

Based on the results of research and discussion in the case, decision Number: 8/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Srg, the judge decided that the defendant was legally and convincingly proven guilty and was threatened with a criminal sentence in Article 28 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 45A paragraph (2) Act. Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code and other relevant laws and regulations. Criminal liability for defendants with mental disorders in Article 44 of the Criminal Code which stipulates if the criminal acts committed by the perpetrator cannot be held accountable due to a mental disability during growth or mental disorders where by his mind or soul is disturbed due to diseases such as mental disorders, psychosis etc. The defendant's condition is that the defendant is not legally competent, as referred to in Article 32 of Law no. 8 of 2016 regarding disability, and there is no sense of justice for the perpetrators.

Keywords:

Criminal Liabilty, Mental Disorders, Racial Issues

References

Abidin, Andi Zainal, Hukum Pidana I, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika (1983),

Hamzah, Andi, KUHP dan KUHAP, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, (1996)

Hamzah, Andi, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, (2010)

Marpaung, Leden, Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Pariaman, Hasan Basri Saanin Dt. Tan, Psikiatri dan Pengadilan, Psikiatri Indonesia, cet. I, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia

Sutorius, Scraffmeister, N, E. PH, Hukum Pidana

Abdillah, M. F., & Santoso, I. “PSIKIATER DALAM RANAH HUKUM PERADILAN PIDANA”. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 10 No.1,(2022):100 doi: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpku.v10i1.42697

Aisyah, Siti, et al. "Hoax News and Future Threats: A Study of the Constitution, Pancasila, and the Law." Indonesian Journal of Pancasila and Global Constitutionalism 1.No.1 (2022): 183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/ijpgc.v1i1.56881

Azhar, Maulida Fathia, and Taun Taun. "ASPEK HUKUM TERHADAP PERAN PSIKOLOGI FORENSIK DALAM PENANGANAN PELAKU KEJAHATAN TINDAK PIDANA DITINJAU PADA HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA." Jurnal Meta-Yuridis 5.2 (2022):164

Farida, E. “Kewajiban Negara Indonesia Terhadap Pemenuhan Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat Dan Berekspresi”. QISTIE, Vol.14 No.2, (2022):45 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.31942/jqi.v14i2.5590

Firmansyah, Y., & Widjaja, G. “MASALAH-MASALAH DALAM KESEHATAN JIWA”. Cross-border, 5 No.1 (2022):489.

Isima, Nurlaila. "KEDUDUKAN ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PIDANA." Gorontalo Law Review 5.1 (2022):181.

Kuncara, Jatmika Teja, and Suryawan Raharjo. "KEBIJAKAN KRIMINAL PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA PADA TAHAP PENYIDIKAN TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA YANG MENDERITA GANGGUAN JIWA."Jurnal Kajian Hasil Penelitian Hukum 5. No.1 (2021): 2598

Makanoneng, Dody, “Cacat Kejiwaan Sebagai Alasan Penghapusan Pidana”, Jurnal lex crime, Vol. V, No.4 (2016).

Moniaga, A. “PENYIDIKAN DALAM RANGKA MENGUNGKAP TINDAK PIDANA INFORMASI ELEKTRONIK DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK”. LEX PRIVATUM, 10 No.6 (2022).

Pangestu, Kevin Jerrick, I. Nyoman Gede Sugiartha, and I. GAA Gita Pritayanti Dinar. "Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana yang Mengalami Gangguan Jiwa." Jurnal Analogi Hukum 4.No.3 (2022):293 doi: https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.4.3.2022.293-298

Ramadhani, Gita Santika, Barda Nawawi Arief, dan Purwoto, Sistem Pidana dan tindakan “Double Track System” Dalam Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Diponegoro Law Review, Vol. 1, No. 4, Universitas Diponegoro (2012).

Salamor, A. M., & Salamor, Y. B. “Kewenangan Penghentian Penyidikan Dalam Perkara Dengan Pelaku Gangguan Kejiwaan”. Bacarita Law Journal, 2 No.2, (2022):66.doi: https://doi.org/10.30598/bacarita.v2i2.5396

Setyawan, Vincentius Patria. "Fulfillment of the Principle of an Open Trial in an Electronic Trial." Sol Justicia 5.No.1 (2022):2 doi: 10.54816/sj.v5i1.468

Sorongan, Tommy Terry. "Eksepsi dalam Kuhap dan Praktek Peradilan." Lex Crimen 5.4 (2016).

Wulandari, Santi. "TINJAUAN YURIDIS PERAN DOKTER AHLI PENYAKIT JIWA DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PIDANA DI SIDANG PENGADILAN (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 182/Pid. B/2015/PN. Dmk)." Jurnal Ilmiah Sultan Agung1. No.1 (2022): 404