EXECUTORIAL DECISION OF REGISTERED BRAND CANCELLATION

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v1i1.2044

Abstract

Brand cancellation is implemented through the delete list of the brands, it has brought legal consequences such the expire protection by the state. However, it is still leave some problems if the brand cancellation not accompanied by concrete actions such of a ban on re-use of the brand that has been canceled.The paper will focus on the analysis of judges' consideration in making the decision to cancel the registered brand (case study of decision No. 85 PK / Pdt.Sus-HKI / 2015), as well as an analysis of the execution of the decision to revoke registered brand (case study of decision No. 85 PK / Pdt.Sus -HKI / 2015). The method used is normative legal research. The results of the study showed that the legal basis by the Judges had accommodated all the substance of the juridical reason for the cancellation of the brand Cap Kaki Tiga by referring the provisions of Article 6 paragraph (3) letter b of Trademark Law (currently regulated in Article 21 Paragraph (2) letter b of the Trademark and Geographical Indications Law).Furthermore, an executorial decision regarding the cancellation of a registered brand may only be limited to procedural actions in administrative business such cancellation the brand from the general register and announcing the cancellation the brandin the official news of that brand.

Keywords:

Executorial, Cancellation of Registered Brand, Decision

References

Cantika, Delila Pritaria. “PEMBATALAN HAK MEREK YANG TELAH DIJADIKAN JAMINAN FIDUSIA”. Jurnal Yuridis 5, no. 1, 2018: 1-22, DOI: 10.35586/.v5i1.314.

Desmayanti, Rakhmita. “TINJAUAN UMUM PERLINDUNGAN MEREK TERKENAL SEBAGAI DAYA PEMBEDA MENURUT PRESPEKTIF HUKUM DI INDONESIA”. Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan 6, no. 1, 2018: 1-21, DOI: 10.33884/jck.v6i1.874.

Faradz, Haedah. “PERLINDUNGAN HAK ATAS MEREK”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 8, no. 1, 2008: 38-43, DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2008.8.1.27

Far-Far, Charles Yeremia., Sigito, Sentot P., Alam, M. Zairul. “TINJAUAN YURIDIS PEMBATALAN MEREK DAGANG TERDAFTAR TERKAIT PRINSIP ITIKAD BAIK (GOOD FAITH) DALAM SISTEM PENDAFTARAN MEREK (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 356 K/PDT.SUS-HAKI/2013).” Jurnal Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, Agustus 2014: 1-22.

Mardianto, Agus. “AKIBAT HUKUM PEMBATALAN DAN PENDAFTARAN MEREK TERHADAP HAK PENERIMA LISENSI MEREK MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 15 TAHUN 2011”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 11, no. 3, 2011: 460-469.

Muchtar, Henni. “ANALISIS YURIDIS NORMATIF SINKRONISASI PERATURAN DAERAH DENGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA”. Humanus 14, no. 1, 2015: 80-91, DOI: 10.24036/jh.v14i1.5405.

Nasution, Bahder Johan. “KAJIAN FILOSOFIS TENTANG KONSEP KEADILAN DARI PEMIKIRAN KLASIK SAMPAI PEMIKIRAN MODERN”. Yustisia 3, no. 2, 2014: 118-130, DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v3i2.11106.

ND, Mukti Fajar., Nurhayati, Yati., Ifrani. “IKTIKAD TIDAK BAIK DALAM PENDAFTARAN DAN MODELPENEGAKAN HUKUM MEREK DI INDONESIA”. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 25, no. 2 (2018): 219-230, DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss2.art1.

Nindyo, Pramono. “PROBLEMATIKA PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM PERKARA PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN”. Mimbar Hukum 22, no. 2, 2010: 224-233, DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16221.

Perdana, Karlina., Pujiyono. “KELEMAHAN UNDANG-UNDANG MEREK DALAM HAL PENDAFTARAN MEREK (STUDI ATAS PUTUSAN SENGKETA MEREK PIERRE CARDN)”. Privat Law 5, no 2, 2017: 84-92.

Putri, Eka Intan. “BEGAL ANAK; PEMENUHAN HAK DAN LEMBAGA PEMBINAAN KHUSUS ANAK KELAS II A BANDAR LAMPUNG.” Cepalo 2, no. 2, 2019: 75–84, DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v2no2.1764.

Putri, Sherly Ayuna., Ramli, Tasya Safiranita., Kurmayanti, Hazar. “PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MEREK TERKENAL “SEPHORA” ATAS DASAR PERSAMAAN PADA POKOKNYA BERDASARKAN HERZIEN INLANDSCH REGLEMENT (HIR) DAN UNDANG-UNDANG MEREK”. Dialogia Iuridica : Jurnal Hukum Bisnis dan Investasi 9, no.1, 2017: 112-121.

Rahmadhiani, Nur Febry., Budiningsih, Catharina Ria. “Analisis Hukum Penghapusan Merek IKEA”. Syiar Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 15, no. 2, 2017: 140-157, DOI: 10.29313/sh.v15i2.3105.

Rifai, Tomy Pasca. “KESIAPAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG MEREK DAN INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS DALAM MENGHADAPI MASYARAKAT EKONOMI ASEAN”. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 4, 2016: 734-776, DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no4.809.

Safitri, Putri Ari., Astariyani, Ni Luh Gede. “PEMBATALAN MEREK OLEH PIHAK YANG TIDAK BERHAK: KAJIAN ITIKAD BAIK”. Kertha Wicara 8, no. 9, 2019: 1-14.

Sugiarti, Yayuk. “PERLINDUNGAN MEREK BAGI PEMEGANG HAK MEREK DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 15 TAHUN 2001 TENTANG MEREK”. Jurnal “JENDELA HUKUM 3, no. 1, 2016: 32-41.

Sujatmiko, Agung. “TINJAUAN FILOSOFIS PERLINDUNGAN HAK MILIK ATAS MEREK”. Jurnal Media Hukum 18, no. 2, 2011: 177-348.

Susilo, Adhi Budi. “PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PEMBATALAN PENDAFTARAN MEREK (STUDI KASUS DUA KELINCI DAN GARUDA FOOD).” Jurnal Law Reform 6, no. 1, 2011: 124-142, DOI: 10.14710/lr.v7i1.12480.

Yanto, Oksidelfa. “TINJAUAN YURIDIS UU NO. 15 TAHUN 2001 TENTANG MEREK: SISI LAIN KELEMAHAN SISTEM FIRST TO FILE DALAM PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ATAS MEREK SEBAGAI BAGIAN DARI HAK ATAS KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL (HAKI)”. ADIL: Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 1, 2012: 23-45, DOI: 10.33476/ajl.v3i1.833.

Lubis, Todung Mulya. Perselisihan Hak Atas Merek di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2000.

Rifai, Ahmad. Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Jakarta. Sinar Grafika, 2010.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Total Abstract Views: 68 | Total Downloads: 142

Authors

  • Eko Yuliyanto Law Firm Eko Yuliyanto & Partners, Indonesia

Published

2020-09-09

How to Cite

Yuliyanto, Eko. 2020. “EXECUTORIAL DECISION OF REGISTERED BRAND CANCELLATION”. Indonesia Private Law Review 1 (1):11-22. https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v1i1.2044.

Issue

Section

Articles