TRADE SECRET CASE COMPARATIVE (CASE STUDY: DECISION NO. 332 K/PID.SUS/2013 (INDONESIA) WITH DECISION CIV. NO. 3:13-CV-00098-AA (UNITED STATES)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v2i1.2121

Abstract

The importance of trade secrets being well understood by the public or business firms has become the subject of increasing domestic and international policymaking. So it is essential to analyze a trade secret case, which in this case is the case of CV Bintang Harapan with CV Tiga Putra Berlian VS Reser’s Fine Foods, INC with Bob Evans Farms, INC. This research compares cases of trade secrets between CV Bintang Harapan with CV Tiga Putra Berlian VS Reser’s Fine Foods, INC with Bob Evans Farms, INC? Then, from these comparisons, what appropriate solutions can be given from this research? This study uses a normative legal writing research method with a case approach. The results showed that in the case comparison analysis between CV Bintang Harapan with CV.

Tiga Putra Berlian VS Reser's Fine Foods, INC with Bob Evans Farms, INC. Is divided into 6 (six) analysis as follows: the first is related to evidence regarding trade secrets, then the second is related to the existence of work agreement arrangements regarding confidentiality agreements with researchers with employees, the third relates to decisions or acquittals of pure or impure free on a CV Bintang Harapan with CV Tiga Putra Berlian, whereas in the case of trade secrets Reser's Fine Foods, INC with Bob Evans Farms, INC does not recognize impure decisions or acquittals, but decisions with prejudice decisions without prejudice or Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice. The fourth relates to the arrangement of attorney fees. The fifth is related to compensation, and the last one is related to the Economic Espionage Act. The 6th is related to the law enforcement process in court. Based on this comparison, the authors suggest that protecting trade secrets can be done through work agreements, and in solving trade secret cases, it can be done by proving the misuse of trade secrets.

Keywords:

Comparative Analysis, Case, Trade Secret

References

Agustina, Kadek Dinda., Nurmawati, Made. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Rahasia Dagang Dalam Usaha Franchise di Bidang Makanan dan Minuman”, Kertha Semaya 6, no. 11, 2018: 1-15.

Alfiani, Reni. “Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Bidang Hak Cipta Paten dan Merek”, OSF Preprints, 2019: 1-12, DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/47ha6.

Alfons, Maria. “Implementasi Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum”, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 14, no. 3, 2017: 301-312.

Chandrika, Riandhani Septian. “Perlindungan Hukum Perjanjian Lisensi Rahasia Dagang di Indonesia”, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune 2, no. 1, 2019: 11-22.

Effendy, Taufik. “Rahasia Dagang Sebagai Bagian Dari Hak Kekayaan Intelektual”, Al’Adl 6, no. 12 (2014): 53-68, 53, DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v6i12.205.

Gerungan, Anastasia E. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Rahasia Dagang Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hukum Perdata dan Pidana di Indonesia”, Jurnal Hukum UNSRAT 22, no. 5, 2016: 69-84.

Imaniyati, Neni Sri. “Perlindungan HKI Sebagai Upaya Pemenuhan Hak Atas IPTEK, Budaya dan Seni”, Jurnal Media Hukum 17, no. 1, 2010: 162-176.

Kusumaningtyas, Syahriyah. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Rahasia Dagang”, Jurnal Hukum Diktum 9, no. 1, 2011: 30-42.

Legrands, Ghiand Carlo. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemilik Rahasia Dagang”, Lex Privatum 1, no. 4, 2013: 159-169.

Linton, Katherine. “The Importance of Trade Secrets: New Directions International Trade Policy Making and Empirica; Research” Journal of International Commerce and Economics, 2016.

Ningsih, Ayup Suran. “Implikasi Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Pada Pelaku Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah (UMKM)”, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 19, no. 2, 2019: 207-217, DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2019.V19.207-215

Paat, Yanni Lewis. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Rahasia Dagang Menurut Hukum Positif Indonesia”, Lex et Societatis 1, no. 3, 2013: 34-46.

Setiawan, Andry., Sulistianingsih, Dewi., Kusumaningtyas, Rindia Fanny. “Eksistensi Pendaftaran Rahasia Dagang dan Implementasi Perlindungannya (Studi di Kanwil Kemenkumham Jawa Tengah)”, Jurnal Law and Justice 3, no. 2, 2018: 73-81.

Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia RI. Laporan Akhir Tim Analisa dan Evaluasi (AE) Tentang Rahasia Dagang (UU NOMOR 30 Tahun 2000). Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia RI, 2011.

Direktorat Jenderal Industri Kecil Menengah Departemen Perindustrian. Kebijakan Pemerintah Dalam Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan Liberalisasi Perdagangan Jasa Profesi di Bidang Hukum. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Industri Kecil Menengah Departemen Perindustrian, 2007.

Harahap, Yahya. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.

Noerhadi, Cita Citrawinda. Kekayaan Intelektual (Diktat Kuliah). Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2020.

Presnell, E.Todd dan David L. Johnson. Attorneys Fees in Trade Secrets Litigation. [s.i.:s.n.,s.a.].

Purba, Achmad Zen Umar. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Pasca TRIPSs. Bandung: Alumni, 2005.

Sugano, Bambang. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Ed. 1. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2006.

Widjaja, Gunawan. Rahasia Dagang Seri Hukum Bisnis. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2001.

Law Number 30 of 2000 concerning Trade Secrets.

Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower.

The United States. Uniform Trade Secrets Act with 1985 Amendments.

The United States. Oregon Uniform Trade Secret Act.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Putusan No. 332 K/PID.SUS/2013.

United States District Court District of Oregon, Putusan Civ. No. 3:13-cv-00098-AA.

http://tsi.brooklaw.edu/cases/united-states-america-v-united-microelectronics-corporation-et-al, accessed on April 29, 2020.

https://dgip.go.id/sejarah-perkembangan-perlindungan-kekayaan-intelektual-ki, accessed on April 26, 2020.

https://www.robertmhelfend.com/criminal-defense/dismissed-without-prejudice-mean/, accessed on April 29, 2020.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/economic-espionage-act, accessed on April 29, 2020.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Total Abstract Views: 19 | Total Downloads: 10

Downloads

Authors

  • Jessica Kirana Budi Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia

Published

2021-03-24

Issue

Section

Artikel