THE OBJECTIVITY OF THE BUSINESS COMPETITION SUPERVISORY COMMISSION IN DECIDING BUSINESS COMPETITION CASES IN INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v2i1.2146Abstract
This study discusses the commission board’s objectivity in a trial while deciding a business court case. This study aims to identify the commission board and investigators’ authority in a courthouse, and the fact that they are in the same institution as well as the concern. This study uses a type of normative research through a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This research’s document source is obtained by tracing statutory regulations, especially those related to business competition. The research shows a relationship that can affect The Indonesian Competition Commission (ICC) decision regarding the extent of authority that ICC has, as contained in the provisions of Article 36 of Law No. 5/1999. This obscurity can provide legal loopholes that have potentially offer a wide range of unlawful authority for ICC. Therefore, the Government has to amend the current regulation.
Keywords:
The Indonesian Competition Commission (ICC), Antitrust Law, Business CompetitionDownloads
Total Abstract Views: 159 |
Total Downloads: 176
References
Fadhilah, M. “Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Kerangka Ekstrateritorial”, Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika 3, no. 1, 2019: 55-72, DOI: 10.25072/jwy.v3i1.217.
Ginsburg, D. H. “Comparing Antitrust Enforcement in the United States and Europe”, Journal of Competition Law and Economics 1, no. 3, 2005: 427–439, DOI: 10.1093/joclec/nhi017.
Jonida, L. “The Evolution of Antitrust Law in USA”, European Scientific Journal 13, no. 4, 2017: 154-166, DOI: 10.19044/esj.2017.v13n4p154.
Maheswari, A. A. “Batasan, Wewenang, dan Keterlibatan KPPU Dalam Kasus Persekongkolan Tender Menurut Hukum Persaingan Usaha”, Jurnal Jurist-Diction 3, no. 5, 2020: 1581-1596, DOI: 10.20473/jd.v3i5.21967.
Manan, B. Hukum Positif Indonesia: Suatu Kajian Teoritik. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2004.
Mulyadi, D., & Rusydi, I. “Efektivitas Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Penanganan Kasus Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat”, Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi 5, no. 1, 2017: 1-20, DOI: 10.25157/jigj.v5i1.235.
Nurjaya, I. K. “Peranan KPPU Dalam Menegakkan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat”, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 9, no. 1, 2009: 53-90, DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2009.9.1.69.
Ohlhausen, M. K. “Section 5 of the FTC Act: Principles of Navigation”, Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 2, no. 1, 2013: 1-24, 19, DOI: 10.1093/jaenfo/jnt013.
OHLHAUSEN, M. K., & OKULIAR, A. P. “Competition, Consumer Protection, and the Right [Approach] to Privacy”, Antitrust Law Journal 80, no. 1, 2015: 121-156.
Paparang, J. A. “Tugas dan Wewenang Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Penanganan Pelanggaran Hukum Persaingan Usaha Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999”, Lex Privatum 7, no. 7, 2019: 32-41.
Rai Mantili, H. K. Rai Mantili, “Problematika Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia Dalam Rangka Menciptakan Kepastian Hukum”, Padjajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 1, 2016: 116-132, DOI: 10.22304/pjih.v3n1.a7 .
Rombot, R. J., & Anis, H. “Peranan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Usaha Perdagangan Menurut Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat”, Lex Privatum 7, no. 1, 2020: 56-73.
Sapitri, B. E. “Kewenangan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Penanganan Perkara Persaingan Usaha (Studi Perbandingan di Indonesia dengan Negara-Negara Common Law System)”, Jurnal IUS 3, no. 7, 2015: 139-158, DOI: 10.12345/ius.v3i7.204.
Solove, D. J., & Hartzog, W. “The FTC and the New Common Law of Privacy”, Columbia Law Review 114, no. 3, 2014: 583-676, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2312913.
Ustien, D. O. “Kewenangan KPPU Terhadap Persekongkolan Tender”, Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora 2, no. 2, 2019: 319-327.
Wisny. “Penerapan Sanksi Administratif Oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Terhadap Pelaku Usaha Yang Melakukan Persekongkolan Dalam Tender”, Pakuan Law Review 1, no. 2, 2015: 359-381, DOI: 10.33751/palar.v2i2.941.
Asshiddiqie, J. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2008.
Assidhiqqie, J. Fungsi Campuran KPPU Sebagai Lembaga Quasi Peradilan. Seminar Penegakan Ketentuan Hukum Persaingan Perihal Tender. Jakarta: Djokosoetono Research Center, 2009.
Hermansyah. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Jakarta: Kencana Pranada Group, 2008.
Prayoga, A. D. Persaingan Usaha dan Hukum yang Mengaturnya di Indonesia. Jakarta: Proyek Elips, 2000.
Shenefield, J. H. The Antitrust Laws A Primer Fourth Edition. Washington DC: The AEI Press, 2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2021 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
