Reflecting Pancasila in Environmental Crimes Enforcement: Diffusing Values to Indonesia’s Laws
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/plr.v5i1.3457Abstract
Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution are fundamental in shaping Indonesia's governance, societal values, and legal framework, especially regarding the right to a clean and healthy environment. Despite their significance, environmental degradation continues due to insufficient corporate accountability and systemic flaws. This article examines Indonesia's regulatory approach to holding corporations accountable for environmental crimes through the lens of Pancasila. It investigates how Pancasila's principles—emphasizing harmony with nature, fair treatment, and social justice—inform environmental regulations and enforcement strategies. Effective alignment with these principles can foster sustainable development and environmental protection. However, challenges such as regulatory gaps and corruption must be addressed. Developing an optimal framework involves integrating Pancasila values into both preventive and punitive measures, ensuring transparency, community participation, and equitable enforcement. Success depends on robust legal structures and public engagement, including corporate collaboration, transparency, and strict liability enforcement. The implementation of this framework may require the establishment of mechanisms such as an Environmental Court and community oversight for victim recovery. This article employs a normative approach, elaborated through conceptual and statutory analysis.
Keywords:
Corporation liability, environmental crimes, PancasilaReferences
Haage, Jaap. Studies in Legal Logic. Springer. Vol. 70. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005.
Hasim, Abdul. “Perlindungan Terhadap Lingkungan Hidup Merupakan Bentuk Penerapan Green Constitution Dalam UUD Tahun 1945.” At-Tanwir Law Review 3, no. 1 (2023): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.31314/atlarev.v3i1.2057.
Indra, Fauzan, and Azis Budianto. “The Position of Pancasila as Legal Ideals and Source of All Legal Sources in Indonesia.” In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, 1–9. Jakarta, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.6-3-2021.2306200.
Khoerun Nisa, Tiara. “Asas Strict Liability Dalam Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Pada Proses Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup.” MAHUPAS: Mahasiswa Hukum Unpas 1, no. 2 (2022): 1–17.
Kurniawan, Ridho, and Siti Nurul Intan Sari D. “PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI BERDASARKAN ASAS STRICT LIABILITY (Studi Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Lingkungan Hidup).” Jurnal Yuridis 1, no. 2 (2014): 153–68.
Lestari, Jesica, Alfarizi Dwiki Hartanto, Dimas Aditya Ashari, Maheswari Kinanthi Prabowo Putri, and Revina Agit Olivia. “Urgensi Pengadopsian Ekosida Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional Sebagai Respon Menghadapi Ancaman Krisis Lingkungan.” PLEDOI (Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan) 3, no. 1 (2024): 77–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56721/pledoi.v3i1.320.
Mubarak, Ridho, and Alvi Syahrin. “Law Enforcement Against Forest And Land Burning Associated With Pancasila Legal Theory.” Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum 10, no. 1 (2023): 42–49. https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v10i1.8827.
Muslim, Muslim. “Kejahatan Korporasi Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Lingkungan Hidup.” Eksekusi 3, no. 2 (2021): 82. https://doi.org/10.24014/je.v3i2.13048.
Ni Nyoman Arif Tri Noviyanti, Ni Made Sukaryati Karma dan I Nyoman Sutama. “Tanggung Jawab Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Lingkungan.” Kertha Wicaksana: Sarana Komunikasi Dosen Dan Mahasiswa 13, no. 2 (2019): 109–13. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22225/kw.13.2.1227.109-113.
Novalina Romauli Sirait. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009.” Melayunesia Law 2, no. 2 (2018): 230–48.
Pahlevi, Farida Sekti. “Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia : Perspektif Legal System Lawrence M. Freidman.” Jurnal El-Dusturie 1, no. 1 (2022): 23–41.
“Pelestarian Lingkungan Indonesia Tergolong Buruk Di Asia Pasifik,” n.d.
Putra Adi Fajar Winarsa, Mien Rukminib, Agus Takariawan. “Implementasi Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup Oleh Korporasi (Studi Tentang Pencemaran Dan Perusakan Yang Terjadi Di Sungai Citarum).” Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran 4, no. 1 (2022): 162–74.
Sutrisno. “Politik Hukum Perlindungan Dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.” Jurnal Hukum 18, no. 3 (2011): 444–64.
Syahroel, Agustina. “Juridical Analysis of Euthanasia (Right to Death) Based on Article 344 of Indonesian Criminal Code and Law Number 39/1999 Concerning Human Rights.” In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Business Law and Local Wisdom in Tourism (ICBLT 2022), 353–61. Atlantis Press SARL, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-93-0_42.
Yeni Widowaty. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Terhadap Korban Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup.” Jurnal Yudisial 5, no. 2 (2012): 154–69.
Yoserwan. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindakan Perpajakan : Upaya Optimalisasi Penerimaan Negara Dari Sektor Pajak Corporate Criminal Liability in Tax Crime : An Effort to Optimize State Revenue from The Tax Sector.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 23, no. 1 (2023): 131–42.
Yudhianto, Haris. “Penerapan Asas Kesalahan Sebagai Dasar Pertanggungjawaban Pidana KorporaSI.” Karya Ilmiah Dosen 4, no. 2 (2018): 197–212.
Downloads
Total Abstract Views: 24 |
Total Downloads: 15
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2024 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
