https://jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/plr/issue/feedPancasila and Law Review2025-07-15T02:30:48+00:00Muhammad Akibjurnalpdih@fh.unila.ac.idOpen Journal Systems<p>DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.25041/plr"><strong>10.25041/plr</strong></a><br />The Journal of Pancasila and Law Review is published by the Doctoral Program of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung as a platform of communication and legal science development.</p> <p>The scope of the Journal of Pancasila and Law Review is the result research or conceptual study of the law, values and meanings contained in Pancasila. Specifically, the Journal of Pancasila and Law Review covers on <strong>Pancasila in the definition of state, Pancasila as ideology, Pancasila as the source of law, and Pancasila as law values</strong>. Nevertheless, the discussion in the Journal of Pancasila and Law Review is not limited towards Pancasila but also embraces other scopes in the law perspective such as foreign policy, international law, constitutional law, criminal law, civil law, and other scopes regarding the law.</p> <p>The Journal of Pancasila and Law Review is published <strong>two issues a year</strong>. Moreover, the Journal of Pancasila and Law Review is available both print and online. This journal supports research availability, through an open access publication. Therefore, motivation in studies and research are easily acquired which contributes significantly in global knowledge exchange that highlights the Pancasila.</p> <p><strong>Starting from 2021 onward, the </strong><strong>Pancasila and Law Review </strong><strong>Journal requires English or French as its main language and therefore only accepts journal articles written in English or French. </strong></p>https://jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/plr/article/view/4080Guaranteeing Freedom of Speech: The Role of the Primus Inter Pares Principle in the Presidential Insult Clause2025-05-05T02:17:52+00:00Muhammad Anugerah Perdanaanugerah.perdana89@gmail.comShafa Ataina Aurellia20410697@alumni.uii.ac.id<p>The ratification of Indonesia’s new Criminal Code (KUHP) on December 6, 2022, has sparked concerns over potential restrictions on human rights, particularly the right to freedom of expression. These concerns arise from the reintroduction of the article on insulting the president, which had been annulled by the Constitutional Court in Decision No. 013-022/PUU-IV/2006. The government contends that the revised provision is now grounded in the primus inter pares principle, which, according to the Minister of Law and Human Rights, seeks to uphold the president’s dignity without compromising public freedom of speech. This study employs a normative juridical methodology with statutory and comparative approaches to analyze how the primus inter pares principle in the presidential insult article can safeguard freedom of expression. The findings suggest that, while the principle is designed to prevent the misuse of presidential protections, its practical application remains unclear and susceptible to misinterpretation. Consequently, further clarification and judicial oversight are necessary to ensure an equitable balance between state dignity and individual rights.</p>2025-06-18T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2025 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampunghttps://jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/plr/article/view/4138Legal Protection of Personal Data Against Phishing in Indonesia: A Pancasila-Based Approach2025-07-15T02:30:48+00:00Gunsu Nurmansyahgunsu.nur@ubl.ac.idRudi Natamiharjarudi.natamiharja@fh.unila.ac.idIkhsan Setiawanikhsanstwn17@gmail.com<p>Phishing in Indonesia presents significant risks to privacy and data security. This study employs a normative juridical approach to analyze the protection of personal data, with attention to both preventive and repressive legal mechanisms. It assesses the effectiveness of Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection in combating phishing, alongside measures of digital literacy and law enforcement. The findings indicate notable progress but highlight persistent challenges in enforcement capacity, public awareness, and international cooperation. The study recommends strengthening enforcement, expanding cybersecurity education, and enhancing cross-border collaboration to advance data protection.</p>2025-08-25T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2025 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung