Holistic Paradigm Contradiction of the Ultimate Principle of Remedium Against the Principle of Legality in Environmental Criminal Law Enforcement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v1i1.2083Abstract
The advancement of marine tourism has a positive impact on local communities and also raises concerns about negative effects on coral reefs. Damage to coral reefs in Indonesia currently reaches 46 percent. The damage turns coral reefs white and threatens biodiversity and the function of coral reef ecosystems. One of the causes of damage is the oxybenzone and octinoxate content in sunscreens used by marine tourists. Hawaii has issued a law banning sunscreen lotions containing these substances. The purpose of this study was to analyze the urgency of banning sunscreens in marine tourism areas in Indonesia as a basis for drafting regulations to protect coral reef ecosystems. This study uses a jurisdictional normative approach and analyzes secondary data such as legal theory, laws and regulations, and is supported by several studies on coral reefs. The results of this study indicate that sunscreen can protect the skin from exposure to ultraviolet rays which can cause acute and chronic health problems. However, the use of oxybenzone and octinoxate as chemical filters also has the potential to cause health problems. These substances also cause coral bleaching even at the lowest settlement level. The use of sunscreen is regulated in several parts of the world. Referring to the progressive legal theory, the prohibition of using sunscreens containing oxybenzone and octinoxate in marine tourism areas is considered urgent because the form of the law is made for human welfare and it is a solution to the absence of laws regarding the protection of coral reefs in Indonesia. Adapt selective and responsible law based on facts and environmental data in accordance with responsive legal theory.
Keywords:
Contradiction, Holistic Paradigm, Ultimum RemediumReferences
Ali, Ahmad. 2007. Menguak Teori Hukum Legal Theory dan Teori Peradilan Judicial Prudance. Makasar: Kencana;
Andi Hamzah, Jur. 2015. Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT. Softmedia.
Akhmaddhian, Suwari. “Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Di Indonesia (Studi Kebakaran Hutan Tahun 2015).” UNIFIKASI : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 1, 2016: 1–35. https://doi.org/10.25134/unifikasi.v3i1.404.
Akib, Muhammad. “Model Kebijakan Hukum Desentralisasi Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Berbasis Pendekatan Ekosistem.” FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 2, 2014: 161–66. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v5no2.58.
Budiono, Arief, and Wafda Vivid Izziyana. “Ilmu Hukum Sebagai Keilmuan Perspektif Paradigma Holistik.” Jurnal Hukum Novelty 9, no. 1, 2018: 89–99. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v9i1.a6916.
Herlina, Nina. “Permasalahan Lingkungan Hidup Dan Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi 3, no. 2, 2017: 162. https://doi.org/10.25157/jigj.v3i2.93.
Kim, So Woong. “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Upaya Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Hidup.” Dinamika Hukum 2, no. 4, 2010: 415–27.
Lawang, Marcella. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pencemaran Dan Perusakan Lingkungan Objek Wisata Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2009.” LEX CRIMEN 4, no. 7, 2015: 58–66.
Lisdiyono, Edy, and . Rumbadi. “Penerapan Asas Premium Remedium Dalam Perkara Pencemaran Lingkungan Hidup Akibat Limbah B3.” Bina Hukum Lingkungan 3, no. 1, 2018: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.24970/jbhl.v3n1.1.
Miarmi, Ni Luh Putu. “Konsep Perijinan Berwawasan Lingkungan Dalam Mewujudkan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 3, no. 1, March 27, 2014. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2014.v03.i01.p08.
Nagara, Grahat. “Perkembangan Sanksi Administratif Dalam Penguatan Perlindungan Lingkungan Terkait Eksploitasi Sumber Daya Alam (Studi Kasus : Sektor Perkebunan, Pertambangan, Dan Kehutanan).” Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia 3, no. 2, 2017: 19. https://doi.org/10.38011/jhli.v3i2.41.
Nugroho, Sigit Sapto. “Pengelolaan Limbah Bahan Berbahaya Dan Beracun Perspektif Undang Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan Dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.” Sosial 14, no. 2, 2013: 60–70.
Radita Ajie. “Batasan Pilihan Kebijakan Pembentuk Undang-Undang (Open Legal Policy) Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Berdasarkan Tafsir Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legislation) 13, no. 2, 2016: 111–20.
Rangkuti, Ridwan. “Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Terhadap Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup Menurut Undang– Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 1997.” JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora 1, no. 1, 2018: 253. https://doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v1i1.253-270.
Sagama, Suwardi. “Analisis Konsep Keadilan, Kepastian Hukum Dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Pengelolaan Lingkungan.” MAZAHIB 15, no. 1, 2016: 20–41. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v15i1.590.
Santoso, Imam Budi, and Taun Taun. “Penerapan Asas Ultimum Remedium Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Lingkungan Hidup.” University Of Bengkulu Law Journal 3, no. 1, 2018: 15–22. https://doi.org/10.33369/ubelaj.3.1.15-22.
Valini, Rivaldo. “Analisis Eksistensi Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Pada Pembuktian Perkara Tindak Pidana Umum.” Cepalo 1, no. 1, 2019: 11–20. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v1no1.1751.
Widayati, Lidya Suryani. “Ultimum Remedium Dalam Bidang Lingkungan Hidup.” JURNAL HUKUM IUS QUIA IUSTUM 22, no. 1, 2015: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol22.iss1.art1.
Yuherawan, DeniSB. “Kritik Ideologis Terhadap Dasar Kefilsafatan Asas Legalitas Dalam Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 12, no. 2, May 15, 2012: 221–35. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.2.32.
Downloads
Total Abstract Views: 164 |
Total Downloads: 162
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
