A Pancasila Perspective On The Clarity Of Legal Formulation Regarding The Single Bar Advocate Organization In Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v6i1.4113Abstract
The ongoing debate over the single bar system for advocate organizations in Indonesia, which remains unresolved in the Draft Law on Amendments to the Advocate Law. Using a normative juridical method with philosophical, comparative, and conceptual approaches, the research analyzes the single bar concept through the lens of Pancasila as the foundation of the rule of law and legal objectives. Findings reveal legal uncertainty and disharmony in implementing the single bar model. While a single bar can strengthen advocates’ roles through standardized ethics and competence, challenges include resistance from existing organizations, maintaining advocate independence, and defining state supervisory roles. The research argues for inclusive, transformative regulations aligned with Pancasila values to balance professionalism and freedom within the legal profession. It concludes that responsive legal politics is essential to clarify the single bar framework in the Advocate Law revision..
Keywords:
Advocate, State Policy, Pancasila, single barReferences
Afandi, Fachrizal, Iftitahsari, Girlie L. A. Ginting, and Erasmus A. T. Napitupulu. Меnеrарkаn Ѕtаndаrdіѕаѕі, Меmреrkuаt Аkuntаbіlіtаѕ Dаn ΝіlаіΝіlаі Ӏdеаl Рrоfеѕі Аdνоkаt: Ѕtudі Кеlеmbаgааn Оrgаnіѕаѕі Аdνоkаt Dі Ӏndоnеѕіа. Jakarta: Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, 2023.
“Bar Council of India.” Accessed December 7, 2024. https://delhibarcouncil.com/bar-council-of-india.php.
Bix, Brian. “Radbruch’s Formula and Conceptual Analysis.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 56 (2011). https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/faculty_articles/450/.
Britanica. “Gustav Radbruch.” Accessed December 7, 2024. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Gustav-Radbruch.
Firmansyah, Hafizh Adi, and Pudji Astuti. “Problematika Putusan MK Nomor 35/PUU-XVI/2018 tentang Pengaturan Organisasi Advokat terkait Kepastian Hukum Advokat di Indonesia.” Novum Jurnal Hukum 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.2674/novum.v3i3.56657.
Hafidzi, Anwar. “Eksistensi Advokat Sebagai Profesi Terhormat (Officium Nobile) dalam Sistem Negara Hukum di Indonesia.” Khazanah: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora 12, no. 2 (September 5, 2015). https://doi.org/10.18592/khazanah.v13i1.517.
Heriani, Fitri Novia. “Urgensi Revisi UU Advokat Demi Menertibkan Banyaknya Jumlah Organisasi.” Hukumonline (blog). Accessed December 7, 2024. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/urgensi-revisi-uu-advokat-demi-menertibkan-banyaknya-jumlah-organisasi-lt66eb7ff0d218b/.
Hidayat, Arief. “Negara Hukum Berwatak Pancasila.” Accessed December 7, 2024. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=download.Artikel&id=15.
Hidayat, Arief. “Revitalisasi Ideologi Pancasila dalam Aras Global Perspektif Negara Hukum: Sebuah Pandangan Indonesia Terkini.” Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang 2, no. 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.15294/snhunnes.v2i1.488.
Hidayat, Rofiq. “Memperkuat Arah Dan Peran Organisasi Advokat.” Accessed December 7, 2024. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/memperkuat-arah-dan-peran-organisasi-advokat-lt64c2781b08e35/.
Hukumonline. “Multibar Lebih Cocok Bagi Organisasi Advokat Indonesia,” https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/multibar-lebih-cocok-bagi-organisasi-advokat-indonesia-lt5e5796279e15f/. 12/7/2024.
Hukumonline. “Organisasi Advokat Di Tiga Negara Ini Anut Sistem Single Bar.” Accessed December 7, 2024. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/organisasi-advokat-di-tiga-negara-ini-anut-sistem-single-bar-lt617d1e18407ad/.
Hukumonline, Tim Publikasi. “Peradi Tolak Konsep Multibar Dengan Single Regulator Organisasi Advokat.” Hukumonline (blog). Accessed December 4, 2024. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/peradi-tolak-konsep-multibar-dengan-single-regulator-organisasi-advokat-lt64c3a99c0b676/.
Imaniyati, Neni Sri, and Panji Adam. Pengantar Hukum Indonesia Sejarah Dan Pokok-Pokok Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.
JBFA. “Japan Federation of Bar Associations.” Accessed December 7, 2024. https://www.nichibenren.or.jp/en/about/us/profile.html.
Leawoods, Heather. “Gustav Radbruch: An Extraordinary Legal Philosopher.” Journal of Law and Policy 2, no. 1 (2000).
Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. “KAI Tegaskan Wadah Tunggal Belum Terbentuk.” Accessed December 7, 2024. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=11594.
Mardatillah, Aida. “MK Diminta Tegas Putuskan Konstitusionalitas Wadah Tunggal.” Hukumonline (blog). Accessed December 4, 2024. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/mk-diminta-tegas-putuskan-konstitusionalitas-wadah-tunggal-lt5c49afebc1fe3/?page=3.
Martua Samo, Samuel Saut. “Organisasi Advokat dan Urgensi Peran Pemerintah dalam Profesi Advokat.” Jurnal Konstitusi 14, no. 3 (January 9, 2018): 511. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1433.
Mukhtarzain, Abdullah Ahmad. “Dualisme Kebijakan Terkait Organisasi Advokat Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.101/PPU -VII/2009 dan Surat Ketua Mahkamah Agung No.73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015).” As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga 6, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.47467/as.v6i1.345.
Natasya Sirait, Ningrum, Rosmalinda, Robert, Abdul Harris, M. Hadyan Yunhas Purba, Tommy Aditia Sinulingga, Asmaul Husna, Liza Hafidzah Yusuf Rangkuti, and Dizza Siti Soraya. Quo Vadis Organisasi Advokat: Pengaturan Model Single Bar System Untuk Menjaga Marwah Profesi Advokat Di Indonesia. Medan: USU Press, 2023.
Prasetyo, Dicky Eko, and dkk. FILSAFAT HUKUM PANCASILA (Kajian Filsafat, Hukum, Dan Politik). Jakarta: Kreasi Cendekia Pustaka, 2020.
Rokilah, Rokilah. “Dinamika Negara Hukum Indonesia: Antara Rechtsstaat dan Rule Of Law.” Nurani Hukum 2, no. 1 (May 18, 2020): 12. https://doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v2i1.8167.
Setiawan, Arif, Lucky Wicaksono, Siti Anisah, and Eko Nugroho. “Perbandingan Pengaturan Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Profesi Advokat (PPA) di Indonesia Dan Amerika Serikat.” Arena Hukum 10, no. 1 (April 1, 2017): 120–40. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2017.01001.7.
Sihombing, Daniel Romi. “The Indonesian Advocates Association As A Constitutional Organ.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 11, no. 2 (July 29, 2024): 315. https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v11i2.35756.
Solikin, N., and Anis Rohmatullah. “The Regulatory Reform of Advocate Organizations in Proposing Oath of Prospective Advocates in Indonesia.” Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum 2, no. 2 (August 31, 2022). https://doi.org/10.19184/jkph.v2i2.23400.
Sulaiman, King Faisal. Teori Dan Hukum Konstitusi. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2017.
Sulastri, Lusia, and Kurniawan Tri Wibowo. Merajut Sistem Keorganisasian Advokat Di Indonesia. Ponorogo: Gracias Logis Kreatif, 2020.
Winarta, Frans H. “Wadah Tunggal Organisasi Advokat Sudah Tidak Realistis.” Hukumonline (blog). Accessed December 4, 2024. https://hukumonline.com/berita/a/wadah-tunggal-organisasi-advokat-sudah-tidak-realistis-lt5e379672d3552/.
Downloads
Total Abstract Views: 9 |
Total Downloads: 28
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2025 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
