Policies to Overcome Judicial Mafia Practices within the Supreme Court

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v1i2.2051

Abstract

The practice of law enforcement in Indonesia until now is still surrounded by various problems that keep the law away from its main purpose to provide justice, certainty, and benefits to the community. this is due to the existence of judicial mafia practices that are difficult to eradicate. The study are focus What is the policy in the Supreme Court in eradicating judicial mafia practices within the court Why is there an obstacle in the role of the supreme court supervisory body in realizing the eradication of judicial mafia practices within the court? What is the ideal policy of the Supreme Court supervisory body in eradicating the judicial mafia This study uses a Normative and Empirical Juridical approach. Normative research is carried out on matters that are theoretical principles of law, whereas an empirical approach is carried out to study law in reality in the field. The results of the study found that one of the manifestations of criminal policy efforts in overcoming the practice of judicial mafia in the court environment by building the characteristics of the human resources of the judicial executing instrument that includes Judges and Clerks to become apparatus free from corruption through proven participation in socialization. , Technical guidance and also comparative studies to countries that have the determination to eradicate corruption, conduct Coordination and Supervision Consultation at the Regional Level and Formation of Liaison and Assistance Team, There is an obstacle in the role of the Supreme Court supervisory body in realizing eradication of judicial mafia practices in the court environment due to by the Weak Sectoral Law Enforcement Supervisory Body in each of the Judicial Agencies, Government policies in eradicating judicial corruption are often counterproductive and the ideal Policy of the Court Supervisory Agency great in eradicating the judicial mafia is carried out by means of penal and non-penal namely namely by using criminal law facilities to punish the perpetrators involved in the practice of judicial mafia starting from the judge who hears the case to the court clerk. As for the suggestions that can be conveyed in this study, it is better for the Supreme Court to immediately improve its supervision of the actions of the judicial mafia in the court, especially in conducting law enforcement that is not selective; and It is better that judges are not easily persuaded by bribes to handle a case and also maintain the dignity of the judge in hearing the case being handled.

Keywords:

Policy, Judicial Mafia, Supreme Court

References

Abdul Manan, 2005. Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama. Jakarta, Edisi Revisi. Cet. III. Prenada Media.

Al. Wisnubroto, 1997, Hakim dan Peradilan di Indonesia Dalam Beberapa Aspek Kajian. Yogyakarta, Penerbitan Universitas Atma Jaya,

Ismantoro Dwi Yuwono, 2010, Kisah Para Markus (Makelar Kasus), Jakarta, Media Pressindo.

Marwan Mas, 2016, Krisis Integritas Hakim, Makasar, Harian Kompas.

Afif, Muhammad, Memberantas Korupsi, Melalui Budaya, and Hukum Yang. “Memberantas Korupsi Melalui Budaya Hukum Yang Baik Dan Cita-Cita Hukum Di Dunia Peradilan Indonesia.” Supremasi Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 2, October 2, 2018: 1-21, http://web2.usahid.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/212.

Airlangga, Shandi Patria. “Hakikat Penguasa Dalam Negara Hukum Demokratis.” Cepalo 3, no. 1, September 17, 2019: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v3no1.1783.

Faiz Muhlizi, “Bantuan Hukum Melalui Mekanisme Nonlitigasi Sebagai Saluran Penguatan Peradilan Informal Bagi Masyarakat Adat (The Legal Aid Through Non Li Ga on Mechanism As Access on Strengthening Informal Jus Ce for Adat Community).” Bantuan Hukum Melalui Mekanisme Nonli Gasi…. (Arfan Faiz Muhlizi. Vol. 2, 2013: 65-79, https://rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id/ejournal/index.php/jrv/article/view/82.

Gunakaya, A. Widiada. “Pemberantasan Mafia Peradilan Dengan Pemberdayaan ‘Gaya Sentrifugal’ Dan ‘Sentripetal’ Ukum Dalam Penegakan Supremasi Hukum (Suatu Kontemplasi Refleksif).” Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika. Vol. 23, October 28, 2014: 167-197, http://ejournal.sthb.ac.id/index.php/jwy/article/view/11.

Kholiq, Abdul, and Jurnal Justisi. “Kajian Budaya Hukum Progresif Terhadap Hakim Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pada Mafia Peradilan (Judicial Corruption) Di Indonesia.” Justisi Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Vol. 2, (2017): 26-44, http://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/teri.

Masafah, Artidjo Alkostar, Mafia Peradilan, Penanggulangannya Masalah, Dan Penanggulangannya, and Artidjo Alkostar. “Masalah Mafia Peradilan Dan Penanggulangannya.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM. Vol. 9, 2002: 1-8, https://journal.uii.ac.id/IUSTUM/article/view/4772.

Suparman, “Menolak Mafia Peradilan: Menjaga Integritas Hakim-Menyelaraskan Perbuatan Dan Nuraninya," Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan. Accessed July 15, 2020: 161-82, http://www.jhp.ui.ac.id/index.php/home/article/view/135/pdf.

Prasidi, Dimas. “Akses Publik Terhadap Informasi Di Pengadilan.” Jurnal Konstitusi. Vol. 7, May 20, 2016: 61-184, https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/232.

Widodo, "Reformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dalam Rangka Penanggulangan Mafia Peradilan." Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol. 12, No. 1 Accessed July 15, 2020: 108-120, http://www.dinamikahukum.fh.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/JDH/article/view/200/148.

Samsuduha, Andi. “Perluasan Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial Dalam Rangka Pemberantasan Praktik Mafia Peradilan.” Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum. Vol. 2, December 30, 2018: 247-274 http://legalitas.unbari.ac.id/index.php/Legalitas/article/view/164.

Siswadi, “Kedudukan Advokat Sebagai Penegak Hukum Serta Peran Advokat Dalam Proses Hukum Di Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” IUS CONSTITUTUM. Vol. 1, November 10, 2018: 1-37, www.komisihukum.go.id.

Suhariyanto, Budi. “Menuntut Akuntabilitas Putusan Pengadilan Melalui Pemidanaan Terhadap Hakim.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 1, no. 2, July 31, 2012: 249-274, https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.1.2.2012.249-274.

Sutiyoso, Bambang. “Mencari Format Ideal.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM. Vol. 17, April 10, 2010: 217-232, http://www.sunan-ampel.ac.id/publicactivity/.

Watuseke, Garry. “Eksistensi Hakim Ad Hoc Pada Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Sistem Kekuasaan Kehakiman.” LEX ADMINISTRATUM. Vol. 5, October 19, 2017: 15-24, https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/administratum/article/view/17527.

Widodo, Selamat. “Diversi Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hak Asasi Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum (Studi Di Pengadilan Negeri Purwokerto).” Jurnal Kosmik Hukum 17, no. 1, January 30, 2017: 108-120, https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v17i1.2318.

https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4535308/kpk-ott-hakim-pn-balikpapan-diduga-suap-untuk-bebaskan-terdakwa

https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/08/29/07241751/daftar-panjang-korupsi-dunia-peradilan-dan-fenomena-hakim-tipikor?page=all

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Total Abstract Views: 272 | Total Downloads: 143

Downloads

Authors

  • Irhamy Tauhid Lembaga Konsultasi dan Bantuan Hukum-Serikat Pekerja Seluruh Indonesia, Indonesia

Published

2020-10-08

How to Cite

Tauhid, Irhamy. 2020. “Policies to Overcome Judicial Mafia Practices Within the Supreme Court”. Ius Poenale 1 (2):107-18. https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v1i2.2051.

Issue

Section

Articles

Author Biography

Irhamy Tauhid, Lembaga Konsultasi dan Bantuan Hukum-Serikat Pekerja Seluruh Indonesia

Magister Ilmu Hukum