Effectiveness of pretrial decisions on the implementation of confiscation and its legal implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v1i1.2068Abstract
Pretrial is a control over the actions of investigators and public prosecutors in carrying out their duties and authority in the criminal justice process whether it has been done properly or not. The method used in this paper is a method with a juridical approach to Empirical and Normative Juridical. The effectiveness of pretrial efforts towards the implementation of the confiscation process according to the researchers 'level of effectiveness is still questionable because as far as researchers' observations are concerned with the influence of the Constitutional Court's ruling, no community has yet filed a pretrial suit related to searches and seizures carried out by law enforcers. / PUU-XII / 2014 more people filed lawsuits for judicial petition related to the determination of suspects, this is evidenced by the number of pretrial claims against the determination of suspects and the implications in pretrial decisions regarding the implementation of foreclosures with the ruling Number 21/PUU-XII / 2014 , where the confiscation action is the tip of the investigator's action in order to prove the trial, so with the decision Number 21/PUU-XII/ 2014, the implications of the investigator are required to be more careful and lam foreclosure. The implication is also in this case that the judge in deciding and considering a pretrial object in the form of confiscation in a case will also certainly have different views because the judge can interpret the law as long as the ruling of the Constitutional Court Number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014 which stipulates the seizure as a pretrial object has not been determined explicitly in the legislation.
Keywords:
Effectiveness, Pretrial, Legal ImplicationsReferences
Abdaud, Faisal. “Upaya Hukum Pascaputusan Praperadilan Dalam Rangka Menegakkan Hukum Dan Keadilan.” Al-’Adl 11, no. 2, July 3, 2018: 103–15. http://ejournal.iainkendari.ac.id/al-adl/article/view/1251.
Anand, "Problematika Upaya Peninjauan Kembali Perkara Perdata Dalam Tata Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia." ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata.” Accessed July 13, 2020: 1-14 http://jhaper.org/index.php/JHAPER/article/view/9/11.
Ayu, Gusti, Novira Santi, Ni Putu, Rai Yuliartini, Dewa Gede, and Sudika Mangku. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Di Kabupaten Buleleng.” Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, Vol. 2, February 28, 2019: 1-11, https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jatayu/article/view/23924
Bayu Prastowo. "Permohonan Praperadilan Oleh Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat (LSM) Selaku Pihak Ketiga Terhadap Berlarut-Larutnya Penyidikan." Verstek. Vol .1. No. 1, 2013: 23-38, https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/verstek/article/view/38787/25667.
Hartono. 2012. Penyidikan & Penegakan Hukum Pidana Melalui Pendekatan Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
http://www.tempo.co/read/news/2015/02/27/063645739/KPK-Tetap-Usut-Kasus-Korupsi-Pemohon-Praperadilan,
http://www.beritasatu.com/nasional/271095-aneka-pelanggaran-kuhap-yang-dilakukan-terhadap-novel.html
http://makalah-hukum-pidana.blogspot.com/2011/12/asas-asas-hukum-acara-pidana.html
Kadri Husin & Budi Rizki Husin. 2016. Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Kafara, Safrun. “Analisis Hukum Pelaksanaan Putusan Praperadilan Terhadap Perkara Setya Novanto Oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (Nomor 97/Pid.Prap/2017/PN.Jkt-Sel Tanggal 29 September 2017).” Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan 1, no. 1, February 19, 2020: 81–94. https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jphk/article/view/7421/5123. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.1105.
Manan, Bagir, and Susi Dwi Harijanti. “Artikel Kehormatan: Konstitusi Dan Hak Asasi Manusia.” PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 3, no. 3, March 31, 2017: 448–67. http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/pjih/article/view/11606/5428. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v3.n3.a.
MMS Consulting. Kajian Yuridis Mengenai Intepretasi Pihak Ketiga Yang Berkepentungan Dalam Praktek Praperadilan. http://m2sconsultiung.com/mms/modules/article.php?id=3>[21 April 2010 pukul 14.15].
Mastri Singarimbum, Dkk. 1988. Metode Penelitian Survey. Jakarta: LP3ES
Muslimin, Mokhamad. “Fungsi Dan Kewenangan Praperadilan.” Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal). Vol. 6, 2011: 52-56, http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/pandecta. Marpaung, Leden. 2009. Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana Penyelidikan dan Penyidikan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Nalle, Victor Imanuel Williamson. “Hak Menguasai Negara Atas Mineral Dan Batubara Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Minerba.” JurnaI Konstitusi 9, no. 3, May 20, 2012: 19-42. https://www.neliti.com/publications/107047/hak-menguasai-negara-atas-mineral-dan-batubara-pasca-berlakunya-undang-undang-mi. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk%x.
Nawawie, A. Hasyim. “Eksistensi Hukuman Mati Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman 28, no. 1 (December 21, 2017): 177–205. https://ejournal.iai-tribakti.ac.id/index.php/tribakti/article/view/475/320 https://doi.org/10.33367/tribakti.v28i1.475.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 27 Tahun 1983 Jo Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 58 Tahun 2010 jo Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 92 Tahun 2015 tentang pelaksanaan KUHAP
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014
Putri, Eka Intan. “Begal Anak; Pemenuhan Hak Dan Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak Kelas II A Bandar Lampung.” Cepalo 2, no. 2, September 12, 2019: 45–84. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v2no2.1764.
R. Soeparmono. 2015. Praperadilan dan Penggabungan Perkara Gugatan Ganti Kerugian dalam KUHAP. Bandung: Mandar Maju
Rahmawati, and Auliana. “Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Permohonan Pemeriksaan Praperadilan (Studi Di Pengadilan Negeri Malang).” Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum 1, no. 2, 2014: 1-20 http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/652.
Renggong, Ruslan. 2016. Hukum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group
Wawan Sanjaya, “Proses Penyidikan Setelah Status Penetapan Tersangka Dinyatakan Tidak Sah Dalam Putusan Praperadilan,” De Jure, Vol. 9. No. 2, 2017: 1--11, https://jurnal.law.uniba-bpn.ac.id/index.php/jurnaldejure/article/view/8.
Srianti, “Perlindungan Hak Asasi Tersangka Terhadap Tindakan Sewenang-Wenang Aparat Kepolisian Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 Tentang Kepolisian.” LEX CRIMEN. Vol. 5, January 21, 2016: 151-158, https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/10613/10200
Syachdin and Joko Jumadi, “Efektifitas Praperadilan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia,” Jurnal Jatiswara 33, no. 1, March 31, 2018: 1-11, http://jatiswara.unram.ac.id/index.php/js/article/view/155/134 https://doi.org/10.29303/jatiswara.v33i1.155.
Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Hasil Amandemen ke 4
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian RI
Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan RI
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman RI
Wikan, Safitri, Nawang Sari, and Eroy Aryadi. “Relevansi Perlindungan Korban Penipuan Dan Penggelapan Oleh Oknum Polri Dengan Penjatuhan Sanksi Pelanggaran Kode Etik Propesi Polri.” Badamai Law Journal. Vol. 4, March 1, 2019: 17-31, https://ppjp.ulm.ac.id/journal/index.php/blj/article/view/6045.
Downloads
Total Abstract Views: 147 |
Total Downloads: 89
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
