Diversion As A Crime Solution Towards Child Crime Prepertrator

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v2i1.2204

Abstract

Diversion efforts is an alternative solution for the sake of realizing children's interests and protecting the future of children from the destructive effects of imprisonment, which stigmatize criminals in the eyes of the community, but all of these have not been maximally realized because there is a court decision in the Lampung region itself which still applies sanctions punishment as an effective method of providing a deterrent effect on children. Based on this, this research's main problem focuses on implementing diversion for children as a criminal solution for juvenile offenders and whether diversion is an instrument in realizing the best interests of children. This research uses a juridical empirical, and normative juridical approach. The results of the discussion are in this research, namely that in the principle of the best interests of children as a criminal solution for child offenders, diversion is one of the instruments in realizing the best interests of the child considering that diversion instruments for children can improve the child's image from the impression of a criminal. The advice that can be given is that law enforcers should prioritize the principle of the child's best interests in every legal process rather than prioritizing repressive actions that lead to imprisonment sanctions and eliminating children's rights such as protection of their future.

Keywords:

Child, Perpetrators, Crime, Implementation

References

Arif Gosita, 1989. Masalah Perlindungan Anak, Jakarta: Akademi Pressindo.

Barda Nawawi Arief, 2010, Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Jakarta: Kencana.

Barda Nawawi Arief, 2003. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Bambang Waluyo, 2004. Pidana dan Pemidanaan, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Muhadar, Abdullah, 2009. Husni Thamrin, Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Surabaya: Cv Putra Media Nusantara,

Maroni, 2016. Pengantar Politik Hukum Pidana, Bandar Lampung: CV Anugerah Utama Raharja,

Nikmah Rosidah dan Rini Fatonah, 2017. Hukum Peradilan Anak, Bandar Lampung: Zam- Zam Tower.

Nandang Sambas, 2010. Pembaruan Sistem Pemidanaan Anak di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Phillipus M. Hadjon, 1987. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia, Surabaya: PT. Bina Ilmu.

Romli Atmasasmita, 1996. Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Bandung: BinaCipta.

Supardji Rasban, 2018. Kasus Kekerasan Terhadap Anak di Indonesia Capai 33%, Media Indonesia.

Tini Rusmini Gorda, 2017. Hukum Perlindungan Anak Korban Pedofilia Perspektif Viktimologi Dalam Formulasi Kebijakan dan Cita Hukum Pidana, Malang: Setara Press.

Wiyono, 2016. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Waluyadi, 2009. Hukum Perlindungan Anak, Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Aditya, and Lucky Elza. “PERAN PENYIDIK ANAK DALAM PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP ANAK SEBAGAI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PERDAGANGAN ORANG PADA TAHAP PENYIDIKAN (STUDI DI POLRESTABES SURABAYA).” Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum UB 1, no. 1 (2014). http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/495.

Anwar, Mashuril, and M Ridho Wijaya. “Fungsionalisasi Dan Implikasi Asas Kepentingan Terbaik Bagi Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum: Studi Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Tanjung Karang.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 2 (March 24, 2020): 265–92. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.2.2.265-292.

Danielt, Reyner Timothy. “Penerapan Restorative Justice Terhadap Tindak Pidana Anak Pencurian Oleh Anak Di Bawah Umur.” Lex et Societatis, 2, no. 7 (2014): 61–71. %0Awww.ejournal.unsrat.ac.id › lexetsocietatis › article › download%0A.

Fithri, Beby Suryani. “ASAS ULTIMUM REMEDIUM TERHADAP ANAK YANG BERKONFLIK DENGAN HUKUM DALAM RANGKA PERLINDUNGAN ANAK.” JURNAL MERCATORIA 10, no. 1 (June 1, 2017): 74. https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v10i1.733.

Hambali, Azwad Rachmat. “Penerapan Diversi Terhadap Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 13, no. 1 (March 27, 2019): 15. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2019.v13.15-30.

Hidayati, Nur. “Peradilan Pidana Anak Dengan Pendekatan Keadilan Restorative Dan Kepentingan Terbaik Bagi Anak.” Jurnal Pengembangan Humaniora 13, no. 2 (2013): 144–51. www.jurnal.polines.ac.id › index.php › ragam › article › view.

Ohoiwutun, Triana, and Samsudi. “PENERAPAN PRINSIP ‘KEPENTINGAN TERBAIK BAGI ANAK’ DALAM KASUS TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA.” Jurnal Ilmiah Dosen UNEJ 1, no. 1 (June 20, 2017). http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/80244.

Prasetyo, Teguh. “PENERAPAN DIVERSI TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA ANAK DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 9, no. 1 (April 8, 2015): 1. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2015.v9.i1.p1-14.

Ratomi, Achmad. “KONSEP PROSEDUR PELAKSANAAN DIVERSI PADA TAHAP PENYIDIKAN DALAM PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH ANAK.” Arena Hukum 6, no. 3 (December 1, 2013): 394–407. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2013.00603.6.

Rosidah, Nikmah. “PEMBAHARUAN IDE DEVERSI DALAM IMPLEMENTASI SISTEM PERADILAN ANAK DI INDONESIA.” JURNAL KOMPILASI 1, no. 1 (October 13, 2014). https://jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/kompilasi/article/view/228.

Sosiawan, Ulang Mangun. “PERSPEKTIF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE SEBAGAI WUJUD PERLINDUNGAN ANAK YANG BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM (Perspective of Restorative Justice as a Children Protection Against The Law).” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 19, no. 10 (2019): 517–38. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2016.V16.425-438.

Sukoco, Bambang. “PROSPEK DAN DILEMA PENERAPAN RESTORATIF JUSTICE SYSTEM DALAM KASUS PIDANA ANAK.” Jurnal Publikasi Ilmiah 14, no. 2 (2011). http://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/handle/11617/4193.

Tarigan, Fetri A. R. “UPAYA DIVERSI BAGI ANAK DALAM PROSES PERADILAN.” LEX CRIMEN. Vol. 4, August 10, 2015. http://hukum.ub.ac.id/wp-.

Wadjo, Hadibah Zachra, Elias Zadrach Leasa, Denny Latumaerissa, and Judy Marria Saimima. “Penyelesaian Perkara Anak Sebagai Pelaku Dan Korban Ditinjau Dari Asas Kepentingan Terbaik Bagi Anak.” SASI 26, no. 2 (June 4, 2020): 201. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i2.306.

Zahra, Afni, and RB Sularto. “PENERAPAN ASAS ULTIMUM REMEDIUM DALAM RANGKA PERLINDUNGAN ANAK PECANDU NARKOTIKA.” LAW REFORM 13, no. 1 (March 31, 2017): 18. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v13i1.15948.

Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code;

Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Indonesian Police;

Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia;

Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning the Judicial Power of the Republic of Indonesia;

Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection;

Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System;

Government Regulation Number 27 of 1983 Jo Government Regulation Number 58 of 2010 in conjunction with Government Regulation Number 92 of 2015 concerning the implementation of the Criminal Procedure Code;

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Total Abstract Views: 14 | Total Downloads: 7

Downloads

Authors

  • Arman Sukma Negara ACW Group, Indonesia

Published

2021-03-17

Issue

Section

Artikel