Implementation Of Criminal Actions Against Malpractice By Medical Personnel
Providing health services to the community is very important, where every community must get proper health services and according to permission from the government. However, in terms of providing services to the community, things that are not supposed to be done by medical personnel are not uncommon, such as malpractice. Malpractice in the provision of health services by medical personnel is a legal problem that must be addressed immediately. One way is through criminal threats for the perpetrators. In Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning Health, there have been many provisions regarding criminal sanctions for medical personnel who make mistakes in carrying out their health practices. This action must be assessed in terms of criminal law to impose sanctions on perpetrators who have committed malpractice. The research method used in this study uses a normative approach method. Normative research is legal research, carried out by examining library materials or secondary data as the necessary material to be studied by searching for the regulations and literature related to the problem under study. The approach to the problem used is the statutory approach. The results of this study answer that the types of malpractice committed by medical personnel are when in malpractice, in addition to actions that are considered negligence, some actions are included in the category of deliberate action and violating the law, the existence of an act, due to serious injury, the causal relationship between severe injuries and forms of action, the existence of forms of actions and the existence of consequences: wounds that cause disease; and injuries which prevent him from carrying out occupational work, or searching for a specified time. Malpractice that is done intentionally is a form of pure malpractice, including in criminal malpractice. Furthermore, the legal consequence of malpractice committed by medical personnel is the emergence of criminal liability for medical personnel as legal subjects which are closely related to proving someone's actions (medical personnel) to be included in the criminal malpractice category if the act fulfills the formulation of criminal offenses. Therefore, the imposition of criminal sanctions against medical personnel who commit malpractice can be punished. This research suggests that law enforcement officials should take an active role in handling malpractice cases in health services
Keywords:Criminal, Sanctions, Malpractice
Gosita, Arif, 1983. Masalah Korban Kejahatan, Jakarta: Akademika Pressido.
Hanafiah, M. Jusuf dan Amri, Amir, 1999. Etika Kedokteran dan Hukum Kesehatan, Jakarta: EGC.
Candra, Septa. “Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana; Konsep Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dalam Hukum Pidana Nasional Yang Akan Datang.” JURNAL CITA HUKUM 1, no. 1 (June 4, 2013): 95895. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v1i1.2979.
Dewi, Sumartini. “PENYELESAIAN HUKUM DALAM MALPRAKTIK MEDIK.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat 12, no. 1 (November 11, 2016). https://doi.org/10.36356/HDM.V12I1.343.
Dwi Dananjaya, A A Ngr, A A Sagung, Laksmi Dewi, Dan Luh, and Putu Suryani. “Sanksi Malpraktik Dan Resiko Medik Yang Dilakukan Oleh Dokter.” Jurnal Analogi Hukum 1, no. 1 (December 17, 2019): 6–10. https://doi.org/10.22225/.1.1.1451.6-10.
Hadi, I Gusti Ayu Apsari. “PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM DALAM PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN DOKTER TERHADAP TINDAKAN MALPRAKTIK MEDIS.” Jurnal Yuridis 5, no. 1 (August 2, 2018): 98. https://doi.org/10.35586/.v5i1.318.
Haryono, Haryono. “KEBIJAKAN PERLAKUAN KHUSUS TERHADAP NARAPIDANA RISIKO TINGGI DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN (STUDI KASUS DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN KLS III GN. SINDUR) .” Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 11, no. 03 (November 22, 2017): 231–47. https://doi.org/10.30641/KEBIJAKAN.2017.V11.231-247.
Heryanto, Bambang. “MALPRAKTIK DOKTER DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 10, no. 2 (May 15, 2010): 183–91. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2010.10.2.151.
Kurniawan, Riza Alifianto. “RISIKO MEDIS DAN KELALAIAN TERHADAP DUGAAN MALPRAKTIK MEDIS DI INDONESIA.” Perspektif 18, no. 3 (September 1, 2013): 148. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v18i3.26.
Miharja, Marjan. “Sanksi Administratif Malpraktik Bagi Dokter Dan Rumah Sakit Di Indonesia.” DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 1 (January 30, 2020): 51–56. https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v5i1.3445.
Ngurah Oka Yudistira Darmadi, AA. “Konsep Pembaharuan Pemidanaan Dalam Rancangan KUHP.” Ocs.Unud.Ac.Id 02, no. 02 (2013). https://ocs.unud.ac.id/index.php/jmhu/article/download/5935/4423.
Perdana, Cipi. “Rekonstruksi Pemidanaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Terorisme Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 23, no. 4 (2016): 672–700. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol23.iss4.art8.
Priyo Gunarto, Marcus, Bagian Hukum Pidana, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta Jalan Sosio Justicia Nomor, and Di Yogyakarta. “ASAS KESEIMBANGAN DALAM KONSEP RANCANGAN UNDANG-UNDANG KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA.” Jurnal Mimbar Hukum 24, no. 1 (2012): 83–97. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16143.
Qomariyah, Selly Ismi, Y.A Triana Ohoiwutun, and Sapti Prihatmini. “Tindak Pidana Kelalaian Menyebabkan Luka Yang Dilakukan Oleh Dokter Gigi: Analisis Putusan Nomor: 257/Pid.B/2015/PN.Dps.” Lentera Hukum 5, no. 3 (December 31, 2018): 465. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v5i1.6761.
Setiawan, Heri, Devka Octara Putera, and Nicolaas Sugiharta. “PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK KEDOKTERAN PADA KASUS PENGANGKATAN INDUNG TELUR PASIEN SECARA SEPIHAK DI RS. GRHA KEDOYA JAKARTA BARAT.” Jurisprudentie : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum 5, no. 2 (December 30, 2018): 99. https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v5i2.6284.
Susila, Muh Endriyo, and Dirwan Suryo Soularto. “IMPLIKASI SOSIO YURIDIS TUNTUTAN PIDANA TERHADAP DOKTER TERKAIT DUGAAN MALPRAKTIK MEDIK.” Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum 1, no. 1 (October 30, 2016): 61. https://doi.org/10.35973/jidh.v1i1.607.
Trisnadi, Setyo. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PROFESI DOKTER DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MEDIS.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 4, no. 1 (April 15, 2017): 24. https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v4i1.1656.
Copyright (c) 2021 Ius Poenale
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.