The Role of Prosecutors in The Effort For Assets Recovery From Corruption Crimes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v3i2.2752Abstract
Corruption is an extraordinary crime because the impact of corruption harms the financial condition of a country; corruption is also alleged to violate the social and economic rights of the community or citizens in the country. Since corruption criminal is included as a extraordinary crime, an extraordinary method must be applied to eradicate corruption. For this reason, also steps are needed to provide a deterrent effect to perpetrators of corruption. Punishment of corruption perpetrators is expected to provide a deterrent effect. One of that steps is to return the state losses caused by corruption perpetrators, as well as being one of the anticipatory steps so that later, people will not dare to commit corruption. This research was made to answer how to recover assets from corruption and determine the prosecutor's office's role in recovering assets from corruption crimes. In this research, the author uses a normative legal research method that conducts an inventory of applicable laws and regulations. The results of research regarding efforts to recover assets can be carried out through criminal and civil legal remedies. Furthermore, the role of the Prosecutor's Office as a law enforcement officer in charge of law enforcement regarding assets recovery through criminal acts recognizes two mechanisms or procedures for recovery assets, the first mechanism or procedure is the seizure of assets without punishment, and the second is the mechanism or procedure for voluntary asset return. The steps that can be carried out in asset recovery are divided into several steps, including asset tracking, blocking or freezing, foreclosure, confiscation, and return.
Keywords:
Asset Recovery, Corruptio, Prosecutor’s OfficeReferences
Bayuaji, Rihantoro. (2019). Prinsip Hukum Perampasan Aset Koruptor Dalam Perspektif Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (h. 86). Surabaya: Laksbang Justisia.
Nasution, Bahder Johan. (2008). Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. (h. 86). Bandung: Mandar Maju.Santosa, Bima Priya., Sitepu,Tedyjiwantara., Maharani, Anita., Sodiq, Nur., & Junaidi. (2010). Lembaga Pengelola Aset Tindak Pidana. (h. 15). Jakarta: Paramadina Public Policy Institute.
Syamsudin, Aziz. (2011). Tindak Pidana Khusus (h.155). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Yanuar, Purwaning M. (2007). Pengembalian Aset Korupsi Berdasarkan Konvensi Pbb Anti Korupsi 2003 Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. (h. 104). Bandung: Alumni.
Yunus, Muhammad. (2013). Merampas Aset Koruptor Solusi Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indoesia. (h. 162). Jakata: Kompas
Ariawan, I Gusti Ketut. (2008). Stolen Asset Recovery Initiative, Suatu Harapan Dalam Pengembalian Aset Negara. Kertha Patrika, 33(1), 1-8.
Arifin, Ridwan., Utari, Indah Sri., & Subondo, Herry. (2016). Upaya Pengembalian Aset Korupsi Yang Berada Di Luar Negeri (Asset Recovery) Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal Of Criminal Law Studies, I (1), 105-137.
Azra, azyumardi. (2002). Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Good Governance. Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, 2 (1), 31-36.
Deli, Rizi Rizki. (2016). Implementasi Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut Undang-Undang. Lex Administratum, IV (4), 46-55.
Hayati, Nur., & Reynaido, Andrea. (2009). Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Yang Dilakukan Secara Tidak Sukarela Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 31 Tahun 1999 Jo. Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 2257 K/Pid/ 2006). Lex Jurnalica, 7 (1), 50-92.
Kusnadi. (2020). Kebijakan Formulasi Ketentuan Pengembalian Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Corruptio, 1 (2), 105-116.
Latifah, Marfuatul. (2015). Urgensi Pembentukan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Di Indonesia. Jurnal Negara Hukum. 6 (1), 17-30.
Lutfi, Khoirur Rizal., & Putri, Retno Anggoro. (2020). Optimalisasi Peran Bantuan Hukum Timbal Balik dalam Pengembalian Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 3 (1), 34-57.
Megawati. (2014). Kebijakan Formulasi Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Usu Law Journal, 2 (3), 125-134.
Prakarsa, Aliyth., & Yulia, Rena. (2017). Model Pengembalian Aset (Asset Recovery) Sebagai Alternatif Memulihkan Kerugian Negara Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Prioris, 6 (1), 31-45.
Pomerleau, Claude. (2008). Reviewed Work: Atrocity, Punishment, And International Law by Mark A. Drumbl. International Journal on World Peace, 25 (2), 118-120.
Romansah,Fauzul. (2017). Pelaksanaan Penyitaan Aset Terpidana Korupsi Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara. Jurnal Poenale, 5 (4), 1-12.
Santos, Ricardo., Firmansyah, Hery. (2021). Prosedur Pelaksanaan Mutual Legal Assistance Terhadap Pemulihan Aset Hasil Korupsi Yang Dilarikan Ke Luar Negeri. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 2 (1), 40-56.
Sibuea, Deypend Tommy., Sularto, R.B. & Wisaksono, Budi. (2016). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Journal, 5 (2), 1-6.
Siswanto, Heni. (2015). Pembangunan Penegakan Hukum Pidana Yang Mengefektifkan Korporasi Sebagai Subjek Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9 (1), 1-16.
Sofwan, Syifa Vidya., & Sulastri, Titin. (2019). Peran Pusat Pemulihan Aset di Kejaksaan Negeri Bandung . Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 10 (3), 151-165.
Sonata, Depri Liber. (2014). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normative Dan Empiris: Karakteristiuk Khas Dari Metode Meneliti Hukum. Fiat Justicia jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8 (1), 15-35.
Sunarto. (2007). Kriminalisasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Terorisme. Jurnal Equality, 12 (2), 1-18.
Vlasic, Mark V., & Cooper, Gregory. (2011). Beyond The Duvalier Legacy: What New “Arab Spring” Governments Can Learn From Haiti And The Benefits Of Stolen Asset Recovery. Northwestern Journal Of International Human Rights, 10 (3), 19-26.
Criminal Code
Criminal Procedure Code
Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption
Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption
Law Number 7 of 2006 concerning Ratification of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, 2003
Law Number 1 of 2006 concerning Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters
Downloads
Total Abstract Views: 15 |
Total Downloads: 12
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2022 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
