Criminal Liability in Land Certificate Forgery at Bandar Lampung National Land Agency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v4i1.2911Abstract
Forgery of documents is a prevalent crime that significantly impacts society. This research focuses on a specific case of document forgery outlined in court decision No: 139/Pid.B/2022/PN. Tjk, examining the legal rationale behind the sentencing of a defendant accused of forging letters, and exploring the criminal liability of the perpetrators. This research investigates the extent and nature of penalties for forgery, including imprisonment and fines, under the doctrine of mens rea, and examines the circumstances that may justify or mitigate such crimes. Employing a normative legal approach complemented by empirical research, this research analyzes both primary and secondary data through library research and field studies. The findings reveal that the judicial considerations in convicting the defendant were based on the fulfillment of the elements outlined in the prosecutor's first alternative indictment, leading to the revocation of a land deed. The defendant was ultimately found guilty of letter forgery, highlighting the application of Article 263(2) of the Criminal Code, which addresses the responsibilities and liabilities in forgery cases. Recommendations for future legislative enhancements suggest the adoption of criminal laws that reflect the aspirations and values of the nation, prioritizing restorative justice to reconcile the interests of both victims and perpetrators, thus fostering a more peaceful resolution without relying solely on punitive measures.
Keywords:
Criminal Liability, Forgery, CertificatesReferences
Ali, Mahrus. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2022.
Hamzah, Andi. Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017.
Moeljatno, S H. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2002.
Sakidjo, Aruan, dan Bambang Poernomo. “Hukum Pidana, Dasar Aturan Hukum Pidana Kodifikasi.” Jakarta: Ghalia, 1990.
Sofyan, Andi Muhammad, dan M H SH. Hukum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2020.
Aulia, Annisa, dan I Made Udiana. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Sah Hak Atas Tanah Dengan Adanya Sertifikat Ganda Hak Atas Tanah.” Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 2 (2016).
Cahyanti, Nur, Budi Raharjo, dan Sri Endah Wahyuningsih. “Sanksi Terhadap Notaris Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Akta 5, no. 1 (2018).
Kusworo, Daffa Ladro, dan Rini Fathonah. “Analisis Implementasi Diversi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Negeri Liwa).” Inovasi Pembangunan: Jurnal Kelitbangan 10, no. 2 (2022).
Kusworo, Daffa Ladro, Maghfira Nur Khaliza Fauzi, Eka Deviani, Nurmayani Nurmayani, Marlia Eka Putri AT, dan Satria Prayoga. “Establishment of a National Regulatory Body to Overcome Disharmonization of Natural Resources and Environmental Policies.” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 9, no. 11 (2022).
Lamatenggo, Christellia. “Kajian Yuridis Pemalsuan Surat Sederhana (Pasal 263 KUHP) Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Pemalsuan Akta Otentik (Pasal 264 Ayat (1) Ke 1 KUHP).” Lex Crimen 10, no. 1 (2021).
Mulkan, Hasanal. “Sanksi Hukum Terhadap Advokat Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Dokumen Klien Di Pengadilan.” Jurnal Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan 1, no. 1 (2020).
Santosa, Wayan. “Interprestasi Kerugian Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat.” Jurnal Komisi Yuridis Republik Indonesia 3, no. 5 (2016).
Siagian, Edel Joshua. “Kajian Hukum Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Sertifikat Hak Milik Tanah.” Lex Crimen 10, no. 6 (2021).
Suantara, I Gede Eka, I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha, dan Ni Made Sukaryati Karma. “Kajian Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat Secara Bersama-Sama (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur Nomor 305/Pid. B/2021/PN Jkt. Timur).” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 3, no. 1 (2022).
Sucahyo, Danang, dan Sularto Purwoto. “Disparitas Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat.” Diponegoro Law Journal 2, no. 3 (2013).
Sugianto, Nanang. “Problematik Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat (Telaah Kasus Atas Laporan Polisi Nomor: LP/263/X/2015/Polres Kediri Kota).” Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 2 (2019).
Susanto, Eko Adi, dan Gunarto Gunarto. “Pertanggungjawaban PidanaYang Memakai Surat Palsu DitinjauDari Pasal 263 Ayat (2) KUHP.” Jurnal Daulat Hukum 1, no. 1 (2018).
Syaripudin, Pahmi. “Analisis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Dokumen Dan Persyaratan Administrasi Perkawinan Dikaji Menurut Pasal 263 Dan Pasal 264 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.” Journal Justiciabelen (JJ) 1, no. 1 (2021).
Utami, Anta Rini, Dahlan Ali, dan Mohd Din. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pejabat Notaris Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Akta Autentik.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 2 (2016).
Wardhana, Arief Wisnu. “Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pemalsuan Surat Dalam Dokumen Kontrak.” Doctrinal 4, no. 1 (2019).
Yoseph, Yohan Armindo. “Kajian Yuridis Pengaturan Daluwarsa Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat.” Jurnal Sosial Teknologi 1, no. 7 (2021).
Zougira, Erick M. “Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Akta Autentik Berdasarkan KUHP.” Lex Crimen 6, no. 7 (2017).
Zulfa, Eva Achjani. “Menghancurkan Kepalsuan (Studi Tentang Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Dan Problema Penerapannya).” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 48, no. 2 (2018)
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 157, Anotasi 5076).
Downloads
Total Abstract Views: 64 |
Total Downloads: 123
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2023 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
