Legal Paradox: Protection of Victims Taking the Law into Vigilantism

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v4i2.3004

Abstract

The rise of vigilantism in Indonesia, marked by public violence against alleged criminals that sometimes results in fatalities, reflects a significant misunderstanding of justice and a lack of specific legislation on vigilante actions. This behavior, akin to torture under Indonesian law, is fueled by public distrust in law enforcement. Research employing both the historical and current Criminal Codes, alongside a sociological analysis, highlights the government's crucial role in legally shaping societal behavior. Discussions on vigilantism involve examining its nature, the legal protections and assistance available, and shaping a societal view that considers both perpetrators and victims. These conversations aim to uphold human rights within the Pancasila ideology, striving for public order and justice that require collective understanding and effort. Addressing vigilantism effectively necessitates both preventive measures to discourage such actions and repressive responses to penalize offenders, ensuring that societal actions align with justice and human rights objectives.

Keywords:

Criminal Law, Government Efforts, Vigilantism

References

Audah, Abdul Qadir. Ensiklopedi Hukum Pidana Islam. Edisi Baha. Jakarta: Kharisma Islam, 2008.

Kebudayaan, Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa Kementerian Pendidikan dan. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Edisi kali. Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2018.

Mansur, Dikdik M. Arief, and Elisatris Gultom. Urgensi Perlindungan Korban Kejahatan : Antara Norma Dan Realita. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2007.

Moeljatno. KUHP: Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2007.

Muhammad, Rusli. Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer. Ed.1, cet. Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007.

Renggong, Ruslan. Hukum Acara Pidana : Memahami Perlindungan HAM Dalam Proses Penahanan Di Indonesia. Cetakan ke. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2016.

Rusli Muhammad, Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer, Ed.1, cet. (Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007), 17.

Smith, Rhona K.M., Njäl Høstmælingen, Christian Ranheim, Satya Arinanto, Fajrul Falaakh, Eko Riyadi, Enny Soeprapto, et al. Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia. Cetak Keti. Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Hak Asasi Manusia (PUSHAM) Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2015.

Soekanto, Soerjono, Legal Aid: A Socio-Juridical Review, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia

Sofyan, Andi, and H. Abd. Asis. Hukum Acara Pidana: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.

Acemoglu, Daron, and Alexander Wolitzky. “A Theory of Equality Before the Law.” Economic Journal 131, no. 636 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaa116.

Allen, Tim. “Vigilantisms, Witches and Vampires: How Moral Populism Shapes Social Accountability in Northern Uganda.” International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 22, no. 3 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-02203004.

Aprisylia Dwi Hapsari, Rochmani, “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Perbuatan Main Hakim Sendiri (Studi Di Wilayah Hukum Kepolisian Resor Semarang Barat),” Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Hukum 20, no. 1 (2019), https://doi.org/10.35315/dh.v22i1.8256.

Azhar, Hanif. “Persekusi Dalam Tinjauan Fiqh Jinayah.” Al-’`Adalah : Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum Islam 4, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.31538/adlh.v4i1.437.

Fitriati. “Perbuatan Main Hakim Sendiri Dalam Kajian Kriminologis Dan Sosiologis.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 41, no. 2 (2012).

Göver, İbrahim Hakan, and Dolunay Şenol. “Crime as a Social Fact : A Sogiological Analysis.” Journal of Current Researches on Social Sciences (JoCReSS) 7, no. 2 (2017).

Gunarto, Marcus Priyo. “Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia Dalam Dinamika Global.” Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 2007.

Hendrawati, Heni, and Johny Krisnan. “Main Hakim Sendiri (Vigilantism) Dalam Perspektif Kriminologis.” Proceeding of The URECOL, 2019.

Himawan, Eunike Mutiara, Annie Pohlman, and Winnifred Louis. “Memahami Dinamika Psikologis Individu Yang Turut Terlibat Dalam Kerusuhan Massa Mei 1998: Sebuah Kerangka Psikologis.” Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat, 2021. https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu464.

Irkham, Mukhammad, Sularto Sularto, and Endah Sri Astuti. “Perlindungan Korban Perbuatan Main Hakim Sendiri Dengan Pendekatan Rertorative Justice (Studi Di Kabupaten Demak).” Diponegoro Law Journal 6, no. 2 (2017): 1–18.

Kaawoan, Gabriela K. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Terdakwa Dan Terpidana Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan.” Lex Administratum V, no. 1 (2017). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/administratum/article/view/15140.

Krisna, Liza Agnesta. “Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Pembelaan Terpaksa Sebagai Alasan Penghapusan Penuntutan Pidana.” Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan 11, no. 1 (2016).

Mubarak, Husni. “Main Hakim Sendiri.” Pusat Studi Agama dan Demokrasi Yayasan Wakaf Paramadina. Accessed March 1, 2023. https://www.paramadina-pusad.or.id/16021/.

Mukhitdinova, Firyuza Abdurashidovna. “Advocacy and the Introduction of Digital Technology in Advocacy.” International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology 29, no. 3 (2020).

Mukhammad Irkham, Sularto Sularto, and Endah Sri Astuti, “Perlindungan Korban Perbuatan Main Hakim Sendiri Dengan Pendekatan Rertorative Justice (Studi Di Kabupaten Demak),” Diponegoro Law Journal 6, no. 2 (2017): 10

Putra, I Wayan Brahmana, Gede Made Swardhana, and I Made Walesa Putra. “Tinjauan Viktimologi Tentang Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Main Hakim Sendiri (Di Wilayah Polres Bangli).” Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 1 (2017): 1–5.

Raharjo, Agus, and Angkasa. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Tersangka Dalam Penyidikan Dari Kekerasan Penyidik Di Kepolisian Resort Banyumas *.” Mimbar Hukum 23, no. 1 (2011).

Rochmani, Aprisylia Dwi Hapsari,. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Perbuatan Main Hakim Sendiri (Studi Di Wilayah Hukum Kepolisian Resor Semarang Barat).” Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Hukum 20, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.35315/dh.v22i1.8256.

Suswantoro, Suswantoro, Slamet Suhartono, and Fajar Sugianto. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Tersangka Dalam Batas Waktu Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Umum Menurut Hak Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, 2018. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhmo.v0i0.1768.

Syamsuddin, Syamsuddin, Ridwan Ridwan, and Iksan Iksan. “The Crime of Witchcraft and Vigilantism Action (Vigilantism).” Jurnal Daulat Hukum 4, no. 4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v4i4.17951.

Syaputra, Rayon. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Kasus Perbuatan Main Hakim Sendiri (Vigilantism) Di Wilayah Hukum Kepolisian Sektor Cerenti.” Hukum 1 (2015).

Tibaka, Leli, and Rosdian Rosdian. “The Protection of Human Rights in Indonesian Constitutional Law after the Amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.” FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 11, no. 3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v11no3.1141.

Wibowo, Ari. “Sumbangan Pemikiran Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Pembaharuan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).” Jurnal Media Hukum 23, no. 2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2016.0074.128-136.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Total Abstract Views: 103 | Total Downloads: 61

Downloads

Authors

  • Septhian Eka Adiyatma Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Published

2023-08-29

How to Cite

Adiyatma, Septhian Eka. 2023. “Legal Paradox: Protection of Victims Taking the Law into Vigilantism”. Ius Poenale 4 (2):95-112. https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v4i2.3004.

Issue

Section

Articles