The Retroactive Principle in Law No. 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rights

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/constitutionale.v1i2.2118

Abstract

Protection of human rights is a responsibility that must be carried out by the state, in this case the state must also resolve cases of human rights violations that have occurred. There are many cases of human rights violations that occurred in the past but cannot be resolved because there are no legal rules that govern at that time. The presence of Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss is certainly a way for the government to resolve the problem of gross human rights violations in the past. The principle of retroactivity was included in Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss so that gross violations of human rights that occurred in the past could be resolved. The retroactive principle in Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss is considered to violate existing regulations in Indonesia, especially it is considered contrary to the 1945 Constitution. -Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss. This research uses normative research methods. The data used are secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The results of this study indicate that the application of the retroactive principle in Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss does not contain elements that are absolutely contradictory to the Law. 1945 foundation.

Keywords:

Retroactive Principles, Human Right

References

Budiyono dan Rudy, 2015, Konstitusi dan HAM,Bandar Lampung: PKKPUU.

Fajar Mukti dan Achmad Yulianto,2013, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Jhonny Ibrahim.2006. Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2011, Hukum Tata Negara dan Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Mansyhur Efendi, 2005, Perkembangan Dimensi Hak Azasi dan Proses Dinamika Penyusunan Hukum Hak Azasi Manusia, Bogor; Ghalia Indonesia.

R. Wiyono, 2006, Pengadilan Hak Azasi Manusia, Jakarta; Kencana.

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, 2006, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Sri Soemantri, 1992, Bunga Rampai Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Bandung; Alumni Bandung.

Triyanto, 2013,Negara Hukum dan HAM,Yogyakarta: Ombak.

Andrey Sujatmoko, “Hak Atas Pemulihan Korban Pelanggaran Berat HAM di Indonesia dan Kaitannya dengan Prinsip Tanggung Jawab Negara dalam Hukum Internasional”, Padjajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.3 No.2 Tahun (2016), doi: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v3n2.a6.

Astomo Putera, Pembentukan Undang-Undang dalam Rangka Pembaharuan Hukum Nasional di Era Demokrasi, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 11, Nomor 3, September 2014.

Aulia Rosa Nasution, “Penyelesaian Kasus Pelanggaran HAM Berat melalui Pengadilan Nasional dan Internasional serta Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi”,Mercatoria, Vol.11, No.1, (2018).

Bobi Aswandi, ”Negara Hukum dan Demokrasi Pancasila dalam Kaitannya dengan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM)”, Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, Vol 1, No.1, (2019), doi:https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i1.128-145.

Della Luysky Selian, ”Kebebasan Berekspresi Di Era Demokrasi: Catatan Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia”, Lex Scientia Law Review,Vol.2 No.2, November (2018), doi:https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v2i2.27589.

Fauzi Iswari, “Unsur Keadilan dalam Penengakan Hukum terhadap Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) di Indonesia”, Pagaruyuang Law Journal, Vol 1, No.1, Juli (2017).

Laras Astuti, “Penegakan Hukum Pidana Indonesia dalam Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia, Jurnal Kosmik Hukum, Vol.16, No,2, Juni (2016), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v16i2.1955.

Laurensius Arliman, “Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia dari Sudut Pandang Penyelesaian Kasus dan Kelemahannya”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Tambun Bungai, Vol.2, No,1, Maret (2017).

Lilis Eka Lestari, “Penegakan Dan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia Dalam Konteks Implementasi Sila Kemanusiaan Yang Adil Dan Beradab”, Jurnal Komuniskasi Hukum (JKH) Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Vol. 5 No.2, Agustus (2019), doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v5i2.16497.

M. Ahsanul Walidain, “Eksistensi Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Penyelesaian Kasus-Kasus Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia Berat di Indonesia”, JOM Fakultas Hukum, Vol.II, No.1, Februari (2015).

Mukhamad Luthfan Setiaji, “Kajian Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Negara the Rule of Law:Antara Hukum-Hukum Progresif dan Hukum Positif”, Lex Scientia Law Review,Vol1.No.1,November(2017),doi:https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v1i01.19483.

Nunik Nurhayati, “Quo Vadis Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Penyelesaian Pelanggaran HAM Berat Masa Lalu Melalui Jalur Non Yudisial, Jurnal Jurisprudence,Vol.6No.2,September(2016),doi:https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v6i2.3012.

Nyoman Mas Aryani, “Gagasan Pengaturan yang Ideal Penyelesaian Yudisial Maupun Ekstrayudisial Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia”, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol.15, No.4, Desember (2018).

Susani Triwahyuningsih, “Perlindungan dan Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) di Indonesia”, Jurnal Hukum Legal Standing, Vol 2. No.2, September (2018), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.24269/ls.v2i2.1242.

Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2000 Number 208).

Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1999 Number 165).

MPR Decree No. III / MPR / 2000 on the Sources of Law and Order Administration Regulation Legislation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Total Abstract Views: 38 | Total Downloads: 11

Downloads

Authors

  • Ricky Tongam Marpahala Siahaan Universitas Lampung
  • Candra Perbawati Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
  • Ahmad Saleh Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Published

2020-12-27

Issue

Section

Artikel