The Urgency of Amendment to Law Number 32 of 2002 concerning Broadcasting as the Legal Umbrella for OTT Services

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/constitutionale.v1i2.2125

Abstract

Digitalization is a global phenomenon that has an impact on changing social conditions. The Broadcasting Bill itself is canceled to be a priority in the 2020 Priority National Legislation Program even though there is a lot of material contained in the law itself needs to be updated immediately according to the times. Therefore, the function of conducting this research is to seek answers in terms of legal certainty regarding the development of legal relations with technological developments in the era of digitalization and constitutional interpretation in the digitalization era that supports sustainable economic development and is in accordance with the Indonesian national identity. This study uses a quantitative juridical analysis method, which is in the form of in-depth research on legal materials and data as usual as normative law. Furthermore, the results of the analysis will be linked to the problems in this study to produce an objective assessment to answer the problems in the research. The results of the research show that the OTT services cannot be in the scope of Law Number 32 of 2002 concerning Broadcasting, therefore the Constitutional Court must play a strategic role in carrying out rapid and precise reforms so that statutory norms can be consistent with the development of society, especially due to developments. Digital technology. The most ideal and relevant constitutional interpretation of the Judicial Review case against this law would be: Consensualism, Prudential and Futuristic with an emphasis on legal certainty for Over the Top (OTT) services and on socio-economic impacts significant impact on the general welfare. It is necessary to revise the Broadcasting Law with the intention of maintaining national integration to establish a national broadcasting system that guarantees the creation of a just, equitable, and balanced national information order in order to realize social justice for all Indonesian people.

Keywords:

Broadcasting, Contitutional Court, Digitalization, Over the Top Service,

References

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2005.

Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Printed in the Year 1780, and Now First Published. by Jeremy Bentham ... London: Printed For T. Payne, And Son, 1789.

Makarim, Edmon. Pengantar Hukum Telematika: Suatu Kompilasi Kajian. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010.

Mochtar, Zainal Arifin. Lembaga Negara Independen, Dinamika Perkembangan Dan Urgensi Penatannya Kembali Pasca-Amandemen Konstitusi. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2016.

Rahayu, and Regulator. Menegakkan Kedaulatan Telekomunikasi & Penyiaran Di Indonesia: Peta Persoalan Dan Rekomendasi Kebijakan. Depok, Sleman, Yogyakarta: Pemantau Regulasi Dan Regulator Media, 2015.

Abdullah, Assyari. “Pola Kebijakan Digitalisasi Penyiaran Di Indonesia.” ARISTO 8, no. 1 (January 1, 2020): 82. https://doi.org/10.24269/ars.v8i1.2092.

Arliman S, Laurensius. “Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia Sebagai State Auxialiary Bodies Yang Menjamin Siaran Yang Layak Bagi Anak.” Veritas et Justitia 3, no. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.2528.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. “Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pengujian Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 11, no. 27 (September 16, 2004): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol11.iss27.art1.

Aswandi, Ririn, Putri Rofifah Nabilah Muchsin, and Muhammad Sultan. “Perlindungan Data Dan Informasi Pribadi Melalui Indonesian Data Protection System (Idps).” LEGISLATIF 3, no. 2 (June 2020).

Doly, Denico. “Urgensi Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2002 Tentang Penyiaran.” Negara Hukum 4, no. 2 (November 2, 2013).

European Expert Group on Sexuality Education. “Sexuality Education – What Is It?” Sex Education 16, no. 4 (November 26, 2015): 427–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2015.1100599.

Fajrudin. “Arti Penting Konstitusi Dalam Sebuah Negara.” Al Qisthas: Jurnal Hukum Dan Politik 8, no. 1 (February 2019). http://jurnal.uinbanten.ac.id/index.php/alqisthas/article/view/1613.

Genus, Audley, and Andy Stirling. “Collingridge and the Dilemma of Control: Towards Responsible and Accountable Innovation.” Research Policy 47, no. 1 (February 2018): 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.012.

Nugroho, F.H. Edy. “Kemampuan Hukum Dalam Mengantisipasi Perkembangan Teknologi.” Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan 1, no. 2 (August 31, 2016).

Riyanto, Mochamad. “Arah Revisi Undang-Undang Penyiaran Dalam Perspektif Hukum Ekonomi.” SPEKTRUM HUKUM 16, no. 1 (July 15, 2019): 60. https://doi.org/10.35973/sh.v16i1.1127.

Rojko, Andreja. “Industry 4.0 Concept: Background and Overview.” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM) 11, no. 5 (July 24, 2017): 77. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v11i5.7072.

Sanusi, Kus Rizkianto, and Kanti Rahayu. “Hukum Yang Responsif Terhadap Revolusi Industri 4.0 Dalam Perspektif Pancasila.” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hukum Transendental 2019, 2019.

Schwab, Klaus. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Business, 2017.

Sidik, Suyanto. “Dampak Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik (Uu Ite) Terhadap Perubahan Hukum Dan Sosial Dalam Masyarakat.” Jurnal Ilmiah WIDYA 1, no. 1 (2013).

Winata, Muhammad Reza, and Oly Viana Agustine. “Rekoneksi Hukum Dan Disrupsi Teknologi Melalui Tafsir Konstitusional Mendukung Pembangunan Ekonomi Berkelanjutan.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 16, no. 4 (2019).

Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Indonesian Broadcasting Commission Regulation Number 01/P/KPI/03/2012 concerning Guidelines for Broadcasting Conduct.

Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning Establishment of Laws and Regulations.

Law Number 24 of 1997 concerning Broadcasting.

Law Number 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court.

Law Number 32 Year 2002 concerning Broadcasting/

Besar. “Utilitarianisme Dan Tujuan Perkembangan Hukum Multimedia Di Indonesia.” Business Law, June 2016. https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2016/06/30/utilitarianisme-dan-tujuan-perkembangan-hukum-multimedia-di-indonesia/.

European Commission. “Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD).” Shaping Europe’s digital future - European Commission, 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/audiovisual-media-services-directive-avmsd.

Indonesia, C. N. N. “Penyiaran Digital Indonesia Tertinggal Dibanding Malaysia.” CNN Indonesia, July 27, 2020. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20200725073801-185-528807/penyiaran-digital-indonesia-tertinggal-dibanding-malaysia.

Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia. “Dasar Pembentukan.” Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia, 2017. http://www.kpi.go.id/index.php/id/tentang-kpi/dasar-pembentukan.

Nasution, Dara. “Tolak Gugatan RCTI! Siapa Aja Bebas Tampil Live Di Medsos.” Change.org, 2020. https://www.change.org/p/menkominfo-platejohnny-tolak-gugatan-rcti-biarkan-publik-tampil-live-di-media-sosial-biarkanrakyatmainmedsos.

Putri, Adelia. “Riset: 84 Persen Remaja Indonesia Belum Mendapatkan Pendidikan Seks.” detikHealth, July 18, 2019. https://health.detik.com/berita-detikhealth/d-4629842/riset-84-persen-remaja-indonesia-belum-mendapatkan-pendidikan-seks.

Ridhoi, Muhammad Ahsan. “Geger Gugatan RCTI - INews Dan Perlunya UU Baru Atur Siaran OTT - Telaah Katadata.Co.Id.” katadata.co.id, August 31, 2020. https://katadata.co.id/muhammadridhoi/indepth/5f4c50fddb2a0/geger-gugatan-rcti-inews-dan-perlunya-uu-baru-atur-siaran-ott.

Teguh, Irfan. “Alat Kekuasaan Bernama TVRI.” Edited by Ivan Aulia Ahsan. tirto.id, August 24, 2018. https://tirto.id/alat-kekuasaan-bernama-tvri-cUvu.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Total Abstract Views: 38 | Total Downloads: 20

Downloads

Authors

  • Neysa Tania Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia
  • Rio Kurniawan Universitas Tarumanagara,

Published

2020-12-27

Issue

Section

Artikel