Comparasion Of Insult Regulation Towards President/Vice President In The Decree of The Constitutional Court

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/constitutionale.v2i1.2203

Abstract

The reform of criminal law in Indonesia, which has become one of the discourses, is the Article regarding insults to the President and Vice President in the 2019 RUUKUHP. The government re-included several articles of insulting the president in the Draft Criminal Code formulation, which the Constitutional Court deleted through Decision Number: 013.022/PUU IV/2006. So the problem in this research is how the policy formulation of offense against the President and Vice President is following the formulation of the RUUKUHP and how the comparison of articles on insulting the President and Vice President in the formulation of the Draft Criminal Code with the Constitutional Court Judge Decision No: 013.022/PUU IV/2006. The research method used is juridical normative based on secondary data through library research data collection and data analysis. The discussion results show that the policy for the formulation of offense against the President/Vice President following the formulation of the RUUKUHP is an effort to provide legal protection to the President/Vice President as a symbol in state life. Comparing articles regarding insults to the President and Vice President in the formulation of the RUUKUHP with the Constitutional Court Decision No: 013.022/PUUIV/2006 have both similarities and differences.

Keywords:

Formulation, President, Vice-President, Insult

References

Muladi. Demokrasi, Hak Asasi Manusia dan Reformasi Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta: The Habibie Center. 2002.

Nawawi Arief, Barda. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bhakti. 1996.

Sudarto. Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Kehakiman. 1986.

Adhiatma, Wemby, and Satrio Prayogo. “Tinjauan Kebijakan Pidana Terhadap Martabat Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden Dalam RKUHP.” Pandecta Research Law Journal 15, no. 2 (September 4, 2020): 207–17. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v15i2.22402.

Anggraini, Anggraini. “UPAYA HUKUM PENGHINAAN (BODY SHAMING) DIKALANGAN MEDIA SOSIAL MENURUT HUKUM PIDANA DAN UU ITE.” Jurnal Lex Justitia 1, no. 2 (May 14, 2020): 113–24. https://doi.org/10.22303/LEX JUSTITIA.1.2.

Astomo, Putera. “Pembentukan Undang-Undang Dalam Rangka Pembaharuan Hukum Nasional Di Era Demokrasi.” Jurnal Konstitusi. Vol. 11, May 20, 2016. https://doi.org/10.31078/JK%X.

Asy, Syukri, Meyrinda Rahmawaty Hilipito, Mohammad Mahrus Ali Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara, and Pengelolaan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl Medan Merdeka Barat No. “Model Dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang (Studi Putusan Tahun 2003-2012).” Jurnal Konstitusi. Vol. 10, May 20, 2016. https://doi.org/10.31078/JK%X.

Atok, A. Rosyid Al. “PENGUATAN KEPENDUDUKAN DAN PEMBATASAN KEKUASAAN PRESIDEN DALAM PERUBAHAN UUD1945.” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan 24, no. 1 (June 27, 2016). https://doi.org/10.17977/JPPKN.V24I1.5495.

Bangsawan, Adhya Satya. “KAJIAN KRITIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 013-022/PUU-IV/2006 TENTANG PEMBATALAN PASAL PENGHINAAN TERHADAP PRESIDEN.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 1 (December 22, 2019): 97–114. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2019.v4.i1.p97-114.

Hudi, Moh. “KEDUDUKAN DAN TANGGUNGJAWAB PRESIDEN DALAM SISTEM PRESIDENSIAL DI INDONESIA.” MIMBAR YUSTITIA 2, no. 2 (December 20, 2018): 173–90. http://www.e-jurnal.unisda.ac.id/index.php/mimbar/article/view/1401.

Jasmi, Putri Conitatillah. “ANALISIS IMPLEMENTASI ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM DALAM PROSES PUTUSAN HAKIM TERKAIT PENGHINAAN MELALUI DUNIA MAYA.” Jurnal Analisis Hukum 3, no. 1 (September 27, 2020): 82. https://doi.org/10.38043/jah.v3i1.2684.

Putra, Pamungkas Satya. “Pemberhentian Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden Republik Indonesia Pasca Amandemen Uud Nri Tahun 1945.” ADIL: Jurnal Hukum 7, no. 1 (2016): 76–89. https://doi.org/10.33476/AJL.V7I1.333.

Rohmana, Nanda Yoga. “PRINSIP-PRINSIP HUKUM TENTANG TINDAK PIDANA PENGHINAAN DAN PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK DALAM PERPSPEKTIF PERLINDUNGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA.” Yuridika 32, no. 1 (August 23, 2017): 105. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v32i1.4831.

Saroinsong, Raisa L. “PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK BERDASARKAN PASAL 310 KUHP.” LEX PRIVATUM 5, no. 7 (December 12, 2017). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/18241/17768.

Usman, Usman, and Permono Permono. “Harmonisasi Pasal Penghinaan Presiden Dalam RUU KUHP.” Jurnal Surya Keadilan 2, no. 2 (2018): 320–39. http://jurnal.umb.ac.id/index.php/suryakeadilan/article/view/113.

Wicaksono, Aditya Septian, R B Sularto, and Hasyim Asy’ari. “KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP FORMULASI PERBUATAN PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK PRESIDEN SEBAGAI PERLINDUNGAN SIMBOL NEGARA.” DIPONEGORO LAW REVIEW. Vol. 5. Program Studi S1 Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, March 29, 2016. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/11011.

Widyati, Lidya Suryani. “TINDAK PIDANA PENGHINAAN TERHADAP PRESIDEN ATAU WAKIL PRESIDEN: PERLUKAH DIATUR KEMBALI DALAM KUHP? (DEFAMATION AGAINST THE PRESIDENT OR VICE PRESIDENT: SHOULD IT BE REGULATED IN THE CRIMINAL CODE?).” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan 8, no. 2 (November 1, 2017): 215–34. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v8i2.1067.

Wiraprastya, Shah Rangga, and Made Nurmawati. “Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Media Elektronik.” Jurnal Hukum Kertha Wicara 5, no. 2 (2015): 1–5. https://ocs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthawicara/article/view/14308.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Total Abstract Views: 27 | Total Downloads: 8

Downloads

Authors

  • Robinsius Asido Putra Nainggolan Kejaksaan Negeri Way Kanan, Indonesia

Published

2021-04-23

Issue

Section

Artikel