The Gap in the National Leadership Recruitment Law By Post Reform Political Parties in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/constitutionale.v4i2.3135Abstract
Democratic States generally elect a National Leadership to lead a State through the General Election process. In Indonesia itself, post-reform, to determine the position of replacing the National Leadership using the General Election system as stipulated in the constitution with the principles of direct, general, free, secret, honest, and fair which are held every 5 years. Before being elected, the National Leadership in Indonesia must be carried out by political parties in order to become the main spearhead of the people in a Democratic State. However, in determining candidates for National Leadership, it is necessary to carry out recruitment organized by political parties to adjust the vision and mission of political parties and according to the interests and needs of the people. However, there are legal loopholes in the recruitment process for political parties which will have legal ramifications for Indonesia's democratic system. This study uses a normative legal method, with a statutory approach and literature study. This study concludes that there were various legal loopholes contained in the Political Party Law which then collided with the System for Supporting National Leadership Candidates listed in the Election Law which resulted in a regradation of the nature of democracy in Indonesia. Therefore it is necessary to improve the legal loopholes contained in the Law on Political Parties and the Law on Elections to provide concrete improvements system in the recruitment and formation of National Leadership. Such improvement is necessary in an attempt to avoid instant with the hope of avoiding instant recruitment which in terms of national leadership results in the depravity of the state system and leads to a recruitment system that runs in accordance with democracy.
Keywords:
National Leadership, Legal Gap, Political Parties, General ElectionsReferences
Aldrich, J.H. Why Parties?; A Second Look. Universiti of Chicago Press, n.d.
Asshidiqie, Jimly. Gagasan Kedaulatan Lingkungan Demokrasi Versus Ekokrasi. Jakarta: Rajawali Grafindo Persada, 2009.
Fajar, M. Partai Politik Dalam Perkembangan Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Malang: Trans Publishing, 2008.
Kartono, Kartini. Pemimpin Dan Kepemimpinan: Apakah Pemimpin Abnormal Itu. Cet. 2. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1994.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2006.
Budianto, Azis. “Pembangunan Politik Hukum Pasca Reformasi.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. August (2016): 128.
https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.5281/zonodo.1257758.
Campbell, Andrea Louise. “Policy Makes Mass Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 15 (2012): 333–51.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-012610-135202.
Christiani, Theresia Anita. “Normative and Empirical Research Methods: Their Usefulness and Relevance in the Study of Law as an Object.”
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 219 (2016): 201–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.006.
E.E. Schattschneider. “Partisan Politics and Administrative Agencies.” Sage Journals 221, no. 1 (1942): 29–32.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/000271624222100106.
Fitriyah, Fitriyah. “Partai Politik, Rekrutmen Politik Dan Pembentukan Dinasti Politik Pada Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Pilkada).” Politika:
Jurnal Ilmu Politik 11, no. 1 (2020): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.11.1.2020.1-17.
Hazan, R. Y., & Rahat. “Candidate Selectiion : Methods and Consequences.” Candidate Selectiion : Methods and Consequences, 2006, 109–21.
Katz, Richard S. “The Problem of Candidate Selection and Models of Party Democracy.” Party Politics 7, no. 3 (2001): 277–96.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068801007003002.
Mangangsing, Nasir. “Gaya Kepemimpinan Presiden Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia 2, no. 1 (2022).
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v2i1.26.
Mugiyanto, Mugiyanto. “Hubungan Oligarki Kekuasaan Dengan Politik Hukum Penguasa.” Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia 3, no. 1 (2022): 14–28.
https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v3i1.54.
Saifulloh, Putra Perdana Ahmad. “Penafsiran Pembentuk Undang-Undang Membentuk Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka Presidential Threshold Dalam Undang-
Undang Pemilihan Umum Yang Bersumber Dari Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 11, no. 1
(2022): 153. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v11i1.867.
Suhaimi, Else. “Prinsip-Prinsip Umum Rekrutmen Politik Sebagai Landasan Idil Penyusunan Pola Rekrutmen Dalam Ad/Art Partai Politik Di
Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Tri Pantang 7, no. 1 (2021): 27–51. https://doi.org/10.51517/jhtp.v7i1.295.
Sulistyo, Hermawan. Electoral Politics in Indonesia: A Hard Way to Democracy. Electoral Politics Ins Southeast And East Asia, 2002.
Trijono, Rachmat. “Demokrasi Indonesia Pasca Amandemen UUD NRI Tahun 1945 Dalam Persepektif Legislasi.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media
Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 2, no. 3 (2013): 343–59.
Yarni, Meri. “Undang-Undang Parpol Dalam Perubahan Peradigma Pelaksanaan Fungsi Parpol Guna Mengukur Perpolitikan.” INOVATIF | Jurnal Ilmu
Hukum 4, no. 5 (2011): 104–18.
Sulistyo, Hermawan. Electoral Politics in Indonesia: A Hard Way to Democracy. Electoral Politics Ins Southeast And East Asia, 2002.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2023 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.