Election Campaigns in Government Facilities, Places of Worship, and Education Units
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/constitutionale.v5i1.3338Abstract
The use of educational institutions for campaign activities is prohibited. In the application reviewed in Constitutional Court Decision Number 65/PUU-XXI/2023, it was argued that the Explanation of Article 280, paragraph (1), letter h could lead to constitutional harm for plaintiffs, both as voters and candidates for the DKI Jakarta Provincial DPRD. This harm arises from legal uncertainty concerning the prohibition of campaigns in government facilities, places of worship, and educational institutions. The legal uncertainty stems from a contradiction between the Article and its Explanation (contradictio in terminis). While Article 280, paragraph (1), letter h explicitly prohibits campaigns in these locations without exception, the Explanation contradicts this by allowing campaigns if they are invited by the responsible party and conducted without campaign materials. This discrepancy between two provisions—despite the Explanation not being a normative rule but rather a formulation of norms—creates ambiguity in the legal framework. This study employs library and normative research methods, examining legal materials from sources such as laws, court decisions, books, journals, and articles. The goal is to develop concepts and ideas related to campaign prohibitions from a democratic election perspective, drawing from the aforementioned literature.
Keywords:
Constitutional, Court, Decision, Election CampaignsReferences
Arend Lijphart, “Electoral System” dalam Afan Gaffar, Politik Indonesia: Transisi Menuju Demokrasi (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2000).
Gun Gun Heryanto, Komunikasi Politik: Sebuah Pengantar (Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2013)
Hafid Cangara, Komunikasi Politik: Konsep, Teori, dan Strategi (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2011).
Ishak Salim Dkk, Memahami Pemilihan umum dan gerakan Politik Kaum Difabel (Sleman: Sigab, 2014).
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara, Edisi Ke-1 (Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2009)
Jurdi, Pengantar Hukum Pemilihan Umum (Jakarta: Satya Kencana, 2017).
Keith Hitchins, The Romanians (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).
Lukman Santoso AZ. Negara Hukum Dan Demokrasi: Pasang Surut Negara Hukum Indonesia Pasca Reformasi (Ponorogo: IAIN Po.PRES, 2016).
Romi Librayanto, Ilmu Negara, Suatu Pengantar (Makassar: Pustaka Refleksi, 2009).
Rush Michael & Althoff Philip, Pengantar Sosiologi politik (Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 1997).
Saldi isra dan Khairul Fahmi, Pemilihan Umum Demokratis (Depok: Rajawali pers, 2019).
Saldi Isra dan Khairul Fahmi, Pemilihan Umum Demokratis: Prinsip-Prinsip Dalam Konstitusi Indonesia (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2019).
Sergiu Gherghina, "Still on the fringes? Far-right parties and identity in Romania," The Many Faces of the Far Right in the Post-Communist Space, (2022).
Alexey G Barabashev, dan Andrey V. Klimenko, "Russian governance changes and performance," Chinese Political Science Review 2, (2017), 22-39.
Anca Gorgan,”Relaţia Stat-BisericăÎn România Postcomunistă(State-Church Relations in Post-Communist Romania),” Revista Românăde Sociologie, Vol 23, No 1, (2012),141–146.
Aziz Taufik Hirzi, Merancang kampanye Pemilu. Mediator, Vol. 5, No.1, (2004).
Carmack, Meagan, Nives Dolšak, and Aseem Prakash, "Electoral appeal of climate policies: The Green New Deal and the 2020 US House of Representatives elections," PLOS Climate. Vol. 1, No. 6, (2022), 98-120.
Enny Suryanjari, "Catatan Kritis Terhadap Politisasi Birokrasi Dalam Pemilu," Civil Service Journal Vol. 3, No. 1, (2009), 55-63.
Febriyanti, Doris, and M. Jerry Pratama, "Perbandingan Sistem Pemilihan Umum Presiden Amerika Serikat Dengan Indonesia," Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik, Vol. 2, No.1, (2017), 23-50.
Lavinia Stan and Lucian Turcescu, ”The Romanian Orthodox Church and Post-Communist Democratisation”, Europe-AsiaStudies, Vol. 8, No. 52, (2000), 1467–1488.
Meagan Carmack, Nives Dolšak, and Aseem Prakash, “Electoral Appeal of Climate Policies: The Green New Deal and the 2020 U.S. House of Representatives Elections,” ed. Malcolm Fairbrother, Plos Climate, Vol. 1, No. 6 (2022), 440-450
Rendy Sueztra Canaldhy, Suandi Suandi, and Umi Purwanti, “Perbandingan Sistem Pemilihan Umum Presiden Amerika Serikat Dengan Indonesia,” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi, Vol. 13, No. 1, (2023), 47–63.
Risma Wati, Winda Wati, and Sarah Dinda Hanifa, “Analisis Perbandingan Administrasi Publik Negara China Dan Rusia,” Pentahelix, Vol. 1, No. 1 (2023).
Sergiu Gerghina aand Sergiu Miscoiu, “Faith in a new Party: The Involvement of the Romanian Ortodox Church in the 2020 Election Campaign”, Politics, Religion & Ideology, Vol. 23, No. 2, (2022),226-242.
Sergiu Gherghina and Nanuli Silagadze, “Selective Equality: Social Democratic Parties and the Referendums on Same-Sex Marriage in Eastern Europe,” Europe-Asia Studies Vol. 74, No. 1, (2022), 140–58.
Sergiu Mișcoiu,”Eine Geschichte von Spaltungen Und Fusionen. Politische Parteien Und Wahlen in Rumänien,1990 Bis 2021, inDas Politische System Rumäniens,” edited by Astrid Lorenz and Daniela-Maria Mariș (Wiesbaden: Springer, 2022), 143–167
Sun Fatayati, "Relevansi Asas-Asas Pemilu Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Pemilu yang Demokratis dan Berintegritas," Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, Vol. 28, No.1, (2017), 147-163.
William O. Oldson, “Alibi for Prejudice: Eastern Orthodoxy, the Holocaust, and Romanian Nationalism”, East EuropeanQuarterly, Vol.3, No. 63, (2002), 301–311.
CNN Indonesia, “Buntut Kasus Anies, Bawaslu Imbau Tak Ada Kampanye di Masjid,” cnnindonesia.com, 15 Desember 2022, tersedia pada https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20221215180220-617-887983/buntut-kasus-anies-bawaslu-imbau-tak-ada-kampanye-di-masjid, diakses pada tanggal 5 September 2023.
Radio Free Europe, “AUR Obține Peste 8% (AUR Gets More than 8%)”, 6 December 2020, diperoleh pada: https://romania.europalibera.org/a/draft-aur/30986837.htm, diakses pada 9 November 2023.
S. Dian Andryanto, “Polemik MK Bolehkan Kampanye di Fasilitas Pemerintah dan Pendidikan, Begini Bunyi Keputusan Kontroversi Itu,” tempo.co, 5 September 2023, Tersedia pada https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1764948/polemik-MK-bolehkan-kampanye-di-fasilitas-pemerintah-dan-pendidikan-begini-bunyi-keputusan-kontroversi-itu, diakses pada 5 September 2023.
Anjar Priandoyo, “Contradictio in terminis: Modernization,” worDPRess.com, 10 Desember 2018, tersedia pada https://priandoyo.worDPRess.com/2018/12/10/contradictio-in-terminis-modernization/, diakses pada 6 Septermber 2023.
Undang-Undang Dasar 1945
Mahkamah Konstitusi, Putusan No.65/PUU-XXI/2023)
Lihat BAB VII dalam Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang tentang Pemilihan Umum, UU Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Nomor 173, TLN Nomor 182.
Downloads
Total Abstract Views: 45 |
Total Downloads: 60
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2024 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
