The Completion of Misdemeanor through Rembuk Pekon in Lampung Province

Zulfi Diane Zaini; Lintje Anna Marpaung; Zainab Ompu Jainah; Thia Remona Febrianti; Sija Putra Rulanda

doi:10.25041/fiatjustisia.v14no2.1880

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v14no2.1880

Abstract

The resolution of a criminal offence does not have to be carried out through legal channels. Still, it can be done in the spirit of restorative justice, one of which uses the principle of ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) or (win-win solution) through the Rembuk Pekon which means through consensus agreement. This study aims to determine what crimes can be resolved with the Pekon consultation, how the process is resolved, and what the legal consequences are. This study uses an empirical normative method by examining the methods, norms, rules and primary data through observation and interviews, the results of the study indicate that the types of criminal acts that can be resolved with Rembuk Pekon include minor criminal offences Article 302, Article 352 paragraph (1), Article 364, Article 373, Article 379, Article 482, Article 315, Article 407 paragraph 1, and the criminal offence of complaint Article 284 of the Criminal Code. So in this study will discuss how the process of resolving minor criminal cases through the Rembuk Pekon and the authors have a suggestion that the police should implement the Rembuk Pekon to prioritize the principles of professional, modern and reliable, this so that the implementation of the Rembuk Pekon can run optimally.

Keywords:

Alternative Dispute Resolution, Rembuk Pekon, Light Criminal Acts, Restorative Justice

References

Al Amin Siregar, R. E.“Due Process of Law dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia Kaitannya dengan Perlindungan HAM.” FITRAH 1, No. 1 (2015): 35-46. https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v1i1.326.

B. Erlina, Hartono B., Anggalana, Safitri M. “Optimalisasi Nilai Kearifan Lokal Rembug Pekon dalam Pengelolaan Taman Hutan Raya (TAHURA) Wan Abdurahman Propinsi Lampung Sebagai Kawasan Hutan Konservasi Berbasis Masyarakat.” Jurnal Keadilan Progresif 9, No. 2 (2018): 100-112.

Braithwaite, J. ”Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation”, The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 36, No. 1 (2002): 109-126.

Djanggih, H. “Konsepsi Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak sebagai Korban Kejahatan Siber Melalui Pendekatan Penal dan Non Penal.” Mimbar Hukum 30, No. 2 (2018): 316-330.https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.32017.

Irsan, K. “Arah Politik Hukum Pidana dalam Rencana Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Keamanan Nasional 1, No. 1 (2015): 80-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.31599/jkn.v1i1.14.

Jainah, Z. O. “Membangun Budaya Hukum Masyarakat Penegak Hukum Dalam Pembarantasan Tindak Pidana Narkotika”, Jurnal Keadilan Progresif 2, No. 2 (2011): 123-136.

Kusuma, J. “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Melalui Penyelesaian diluar Proses,” Sol Justicia 2, No. 1 (2019): 21-35. http://ojs.ukb.ac.id/index.php/sj/article/view/50.

Lampung Province Regional Regulation Number 1 Year of 2016 concerning Guidelines for Village and Village Discussion in Preventing Conflict in Lampung Province.

M. Ridwan. Mediasi Penal Terhadap Perkara KDRT (Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga), Jakarta: Yayasan Gema Yustisia Indonesia, 2010.

Muhaimin.“Restoratif Justice dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 19, No. 2 (2019): 185-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2019.V19.185-206.

Mulyadi, L. “Mediasi Penal dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia: Pengkajian Asas, Norma, Teori dan Praktik.” Yustisia 2, No. 1 (2013): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v2i1.11054.

Moeljatno. Asas – Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta,2003.

Nawawi, B. Arief. Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2001.

Okamahendra, N. “Eksistensi Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No. 02 Tahun 2012 tentang Penyesuaian Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan dan Jumlah Denda dalam KUHP.” JATISWARA Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 32, No. 1 (2017): 110-119. https://doi.org/10.29303/jatiswara.v32i1.74.

P. Teguh and H. B. Abdul. Politik Hukum Pidana – Kajian Kebijakan Kriminalisasi dan Dekriminalisasi. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2005.

Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation Number 02 Year of 2012 concerning Adjustment of Limits of Minor Crimes and the Amount of Fines in the Criminal Code.

S. Soerjono. Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pres, 1984.

S. Soerjono., M. Sri. Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2011.

Suhariyanto, B. “Progresivitas Putusan Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi.”Jurnal Penelitian De Jure 16, No. 2 (2016): 201-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2016.V16.201-213.

Surya, F. A. “Tinjauan Mediasi Penal Perspektif Hukum Adat dan Hukum Islam.” Jurisprudence 5, No. 2 (2015): 118-126. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v5i2.4229.

Simanjuntak, N. “Penguatan Lembaga Adat Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.” Negara Hukum 4, No. 1 (2013): 36-66. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v4i1.195.

Sirait, T. M. “The Implementation of Procedural Law of Responsibility Enforcement of Corporate Crime in Integral Criminal Justice System.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 17, No. 3 (2017): 343-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2017.17.3.769.

Thalib, H., Ramadhan, A., Djanggih, H. “The Corruption Investigation in the Regional Police of Riau Island, Indonesia.” Rechtsidee 4, No. 1 (2017): 71-86. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v4i1.988.

Act Number 1 of 1946 concerning the Imposition of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP).

Act Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Law (KUHAP).

Act Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution.

The Act Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Indonesian National Police.

Yusriando. “Implementasi Mediasi Penal Sebagai Perwujudan Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Guna Mendukung Supremasi Hukum dalam Rangka Pembangunan Nasional.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 2, No. 1 (2018) : 23-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v2i1.1413.

Zaini, Z. D. “Lembaga Mediasi Perbankan Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan di Indonesia.” Jurnal Keadilan Progresif 3, No. 1 (2012): 1-20.