Separatist Creditors Problems on Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations Based on the Supreme Court’s Decree Number 30/KMA/SK/I/2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no3.1956Abstract
Debt Payment Obligation postponement is an effort for creditors and debtors to settle the debts with a more efficient process. The creditor of a company consists of concurrent and separatist creditors. Based on the Supreme Court Decree Number 30/KMA/SK/I/2020 Book I on the Guidelines for the Settlement of Requests for Bankrupt and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, the creditors who can submit Postponement of Debt Payment Obligation (PKPU) are only concurrent creditors. The separatist creditors are not allowed to submit PKPU. This is different from the Bankruptcy and the Postponement of Debt Payment Law Number 37 of 2004. Based on Law Number 37 of 2004, Creditors who can submit Postponement of Debt Payment Obligation are creditors who estimate that the debtor cannot continue to pay debts that are due and can be billed, can request that the debtor be given a postponement of debt payment, to enable the debtor to submit a reconciliatory proposal which includes offering the payment of part or all of the debt to the creditor. However, based on the Supreme Court Decree, only the concurrent creditor can submit Debt Payment Obligation’s postponement. As a result of this Supreme Court Decree, the separatist creditors cannot apply for Debt Payment Obligation postponement. Separatist creditors can propose the postponement of debt payment obligations if the separatist creditor has turned into a concurrent creditor. Separatist creditors become concurrent creditors if the collateral provided value is insufficient for the company’s obligations so that the separatist creditors can propose to be part of the concurrent creditors. By becoming a concurrent creditor, the separatist creditors can submit to be part of the peace proposal and distribute the remaining company assets.
Keywords:
Concurrent, Indonesian Bankruptcy Law, Postponement of Debt Payment ObligationReferences
Ayotte, Kenneth M., Morrison, Edward R. “Creditor Control and Conflict in Chapter 11”, Journal of Legal Analysis 1, no. 2, 2009: 511-551, DOI: 10.1093/jla/1.2.511.
Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 7/2/PBI/2005 on the Asset Quality Assessment of Commercial Bank Loans
The Constitutional Courts Number 67/PUU-XI/2013 on the Position of Separatist Creditor, especially Worker Wages.
Dona, P., Daulay, Z., Ulfanora. “Juridical Analysis of Partner Liabilities in Bankruptcy Process at CV AGro Sawita Mandiri Perkasa”, International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 6, no. 3, 2019: 96-104, DOI: 10.18415/ijmmu.v6i3.771.
Fluorentinus, Dewanto R. “Kedudukan Kreditur Selaku Penerima Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Hal Debitur Pailit”, Thesis, Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Diponegoro, 2009.
Inge Dwisvimiar, ”Keadilan Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu Hukum”, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 11, no. 3, 2011: 520-530, DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.3.179.
Johan, Suwinto, Merger Akuisisi dan Restrukturisasi, Bogor: IPB Press, 2018.
Kemala A Hayati, et.al., ”Hak Suara Kreditor Separatis Dalam Proses Pengajuan Upaya Perdamaian Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang”, USU Law Journal 14, no. 1, 2016: 116-126.
Law No. 37 of 2004 on the Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations
Law No. 4 of 1996 on the Mortgage Right
Law No. 42 of 1999 regarding Fiduciary Transfer,
Lie, Gunardi. et.al., “Problematika UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU Terhadap Bank Sebagai Kreditor Separatis”, Jurnal Bakti Masyarakat Indonesia 2, no. 2, 2019: 159-168, DOI: 10.24912/jbmi.v2i2.7242.
Lukmanul Hakim, “The Alternative Model Settlement of Credit Problems in Banking Agencies”, Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 12, no. 2, (2018): 143-155, DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v12no2.1299.
Murniati, R. & Selvya, D.C. “Separatist Creditors vs. Preferred Creditors Rights in the Bankruptcy Case Based on the Decision of Constitutional Court of 2013”, Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 13, no. 3, 2019: 231-240, DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v13no3.1616.
Nadirah, Ida., Nasution, Bismar, “Composition Bankruptcy As Realization Principles of Balance Between Debtor and Creditor”, South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law 11, no. 4, 2016: 1-10, 1.
Rahayu Hartini, “Legal Status of Bank Guarantee on Behalf of Third Parties in the Bankruptcy Perspective”, Yustisia 6, no. 1, 2017: 190-198, DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v6i1.11530.
Rully Afraldo Daely, Ramli Siregar, Windha Windha, “Kedudukan Benda Jaminan Yang Dibebani Hak Tanggungan dan Eksekusi Benda Jaminan Dalam Hal Debitur Pailit”, Transparency, Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi 3, no. 2, 2014: 1-10.
Silalahi, Udin., Claudia. “Kedudukan Kreditor Separatis atas Hak Jaminan Dalam Proses Kepailitan”, Masalah-Masalah Hukum 49, no. 1, 2020: 35-47, DOI: 10.14710/mmh.49.1.2020.35-47.
Slamet, S. Redjeki. “Perlindungan Hukum dan Kedudukan Kreditor Separatis Dalam Hal Terjadi Kepailitan Terhadap Debitor”, Forum Ilmiah Jurnal Bunga Rampai 13, no. 1, 2016: 104-114.
Sukarta, I. Wayan. “Kedudukan dan Hak Bank terhadap Hak Preferen Upah Buruh Dalam Kepailitan”, Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 6, no. 3. (2017): 300-309, DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2017.v06.i03.p03.
Supreme Court Decree Number 30/KMA/SK/I/2020 Book I on the Guidelines for the Settlement of Requests for Bankrupt and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations.
Tristam P Moeliono dan Tanius Sebastian, “Tendensi Reduksionis dan Utilitarianis dalam Ilmu Hukum Indonesia: Membaca Ulang Filsafat Hukum Gustav Radbruch”, Paper presented at the 5th National Conference of the Indonesian Legal Philosophy Association. Solo, 2015.
Waltraud, S. Scott. “Deferred Cash Payments to Secured Creditors in Cram Down of Chapter 11 Plans: A Matter of Interest”, Washinton Law Review 64, no. 4 (1988): 1041-1061,
Yolanda, Nina. “Analisis Yuridis Hak Kreditor Separtis Pemegang Hak Tanggungan Dalam Kepailitan”, Jurnal Litigasi 14, no. 2 (2013): 1937-1974, DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v14i2.86.
Zaini, Z.D., Hakim, Lukmanul. “Prevention and Handling of the Crisis of Financial Systems in Banking Institutions”, Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 13, no. 2 (2019): 151-166, DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v13no2.1567.
Downloads
Total Abstract Views: 63 |
Total Downloads: 66
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
