Restorative Justice for Users of Narcotics Through Implementation of Depenalization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no2.2649Abstract
Restorative Justice is a policy that emphasizes recovery over retaliation, marking a significant shift in Indonesia's criminal law system. This approach has been recognized as more effective in achieving justice and operational efficiency, thus renewing the framework of criminal law in the country. This article employs a descriptive-analytical research method with a normative juridical approach to explore the role of Restorative Justice in reforming criminal law and its application as an alternative strategy in narcotics law enforcement. The findings indicate that the implementation of Restorative Justice represents a pivotal update in the legal landscape, particularly within criminal law. Conventional justice policies, often criticized for their ineffectiveness, are now being reformed through Restorative Justice measures. This transition is not confined to general criminal law; it also encompasses narcotics offenses, where the principles of Restorative Justice are applied. The Supreme Court Circular Number 4 of 2010 (SEMA 4/2010) establishes a framework for placing narcotics offenders, victims, and addicts into medical and social rehabilitation institutions. Rehabilitation can only be pursued if the offenders meet specific requirements outlined in this regulation, reinforcing the focus on recovery as a primary objective in addressing narcotics crimes.
Keywords:
Criminal Law Reform, Restorative Justice, Narcotics Crime, RehabilitationReferences
Ariani, Nevey Varida. “Implementasi Undang-Undang 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Dalam Upaya Melindungi Kepentingan Anak.” Jurnal Media Hukum 21, no. 1 (2014): 16. https://borang.umy.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/1160.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan Dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2005.
Azwad Rachmat, Hambali. “Penegakan Hukum Melalui Pendekatan Restorative Justice Penyelesaian Masalah Pidana.” Kalabbirang Law Journal 2, no. 1 (2020): 69–76.
BNN. “Press Realease Akhir Tahun 2020 "Sikap Tegas BNN, Wujudkan Indonesia Bebas D Ari Narkoba.” Badan Narkotika Nasional Republik Indonesia. 2020. https://bnn.go.id/press-release-akhir-tahun-2020.
Chandra, Septa. “Politik Hukum Pengadopsian Restorative Justice Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana.” FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 2 (2015): 255–77. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no2.301.
Equatora, Muhammad Ali, Galogo Sakti, . Rachmayanthy, and Shinta Muliati. “The Role of Correctional Social Workers in Personality Development in Yogyakarta Narcotics Correctional.” International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology 04, no. 09 (2020): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.33564/ijeast.2020.v04i09.001.
Mahesti, Ranu. “Pendampingan Rehabilitasi Bagi Pecandu Dan Korban Penyalahgunaan Narkotika.” Jurnal Pengembangan Masyarakat Islam 53, no. 9 (2013): 1689–99. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.32678/lbrmasy.v4i1.4294.
Mahkamah Agung. “Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2010 Tentang Penempatan Penyalahguna, Korban Penyalahguna Dan Pecandu Narkotika Ke Dalam Lembaga Rehabilitasi Medis Dan Rehabilitasi Sosial.,” 2010.
Mansyur, Ridwan. “Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Tujuan Pelaksanaan Diversi Pada Sistem Peradilan Anak.” Mahkamah Agung. 2017. https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/id/artikel/2613/keadilan-restoratif-sebagai-tujuan-pelaksanaan-diversi-pada-sistem-peradilan-pidana-anak.
Nasional, Badan Narkotika. “Press Realease Badan Narkotika Nasional Mengenai Sindikat Jaringan Narkoba Internasional.” BNN. 2021. https://bnn.go.id/press-release-badan-narkotika-nasional-mengenai-sindikat-jaringan-2/.
Oktarina, Tri Nurmega, and Central Java. “Narcotics And Children: How Diversion Mechanism Could Be An Effective Way?” 5 (2021): 75–88. http://lppm-unissula.com/jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/apic/article/view/10988/4229.
Satrio, Arie Dwi. “Lapas Kelebihan Kapasitas Hingga 131%, Terbanyaknya Narpidana Kasus Narkoba.” Okezone. 2021. https://nasional.okezone.com/read/2021/05/07/337/2407159/lapas-kelebihan-kapasitas-hingga-131-terbanyak-narapidana-kasus-narkoba.
Shinta, Meinar Ayu Dewi. “Problem Analysis of Proposing Parole Relation to Narcotics Prisoners Related to PP Number 99 Year 2012 in Nusakambangan Narcotics Prison” 499, no. 99 (2020): 310–14. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201209.303.
Siregar, Rospita Adelina. “Restorative Justice Bagi Terpidana Pemakain Narkotika Golongan 1.” Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan Indonesia 01, no. 01 (2021): 1–10.
Siswanto. Politik Hukum Dalam Undang-Undang Narkotika. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, 2012.
Soekamto, Soerjono. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Edisi 1 Ce. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2001.
Syafei, Imam As. “The 5 Th PROCEEDING “ Legal Reconstruction in Indonesia.” In Unissula Press, edited by Amin Purnawan, 92. Semarang: PDIH UNISSULA, 2019. http://lppm-unissula.com/jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/apic/article/view/10988/4229.
Tengens, Jecky. “Pendekatan Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Pidana Indonesia.” Hukum Online, 2011.
Tyerman, Zachary, Shawn Shah, J. Hunter Mehaffey, Tanya Wanchek, Robert B. Hawkins, Elizabeth T. Rogawski McQuade, Alexander Shannon, Gorav Ailawadi, and Kenan W. Yount. “Cost-Effectiveness of Postoperative Drug Rehabilitation for Injection Drug Users.” In Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 110:492–99. Elsevier USA, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.11.011.
Wibowo, Bagus Satrio, and Zainal Asikin. “International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding Application of Integrated Assessment in Law Enforcement against Narcotics Abusers,” no. 1 (2021): 422–29.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2022 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.