Legal Considerations of Judges in Imposing Coaching Sanctions Against Children of Thieves with Objection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/plr.v1i1.2064Abstract
Criminal acts committed by children should be placed in LPKA as referred to in the law on juvenile justice, however the judge in this decision prefers to place the child in the development of a boarding school, of course in this case the judge has his own considerations. This paper will examine the basic legal considerations of judges in imposing criminal guidance on children who are criminal offenders of theft with weighting, the suitability of decision Number: 8/Pid.Sus-Anak/2016/PN.Kot with the demands of the Public Prosecutor, and the mechanism for implementing the verdict. Number: 8/Pid.Sus-Anak/2016/PN.Kot. The research method used in this research uses a normative approach, namely normative research which is carried out by examining the laws and basic theories. As for the results of the research, it was found that the basis for judges' legal considerations in making decisions against children, that in the trial the judge saw the two children who committed the crime not because of the crime factor but because the dominant factor of juvenile delinquency and also the two children could still be mentally corrected by giving opportunity for both children will certainly provide protection for their rights. The judge's decision was not in accordance with the prosecutor's demands where there were differences, namely: first, the judge did not agree with the method of imposing penalties that put children in LPKA; second, the judge's freedom to impose sanctions is also a factor in the incompatibility between the prosecutor's demands and the judge's decision; third, the impact of the harm caused by the two children was not too big. The mechanism for implementing the Decision Number:8/Pid.Sus-Anak/2016/Pn.Kot where the judge handed down the punishment of coaching in the institution to the two defendants in the form of an obligation to participate in a coaching program at the Islamic Boarding School, so that the guidance method followed the guidance method in the pesantren. Based on the results of the research conducted, it is recommended that the Public Prosecutor pay more attention to aspects of benefit in imposing criminal sanctions on children. In addition, the judge's future considerations should reflect justice and progressive steps.
Keywords:
Judges considerations, Child Development, TheftReferences
Ahmad Irzal Fardiansyah, Suseno Sigid, Rukmini Mien, and Sulistiani Lies, ‘Pengakuan Terhadap Hukum Pidana Adat Di Indonesia', Jurnal Bina Mulya Hukum, 4.1 (2019), 112–29.
Arief Gosita, 2001, Masalah Perlindungan Anak, , Bhuana Ilmu Populer, Jakarta.
Bagir Manan, 2000, Peran Hakim Dalam Dekolonialisasi Hukum dalam Wajah Hukum di Era Reformasi, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Romli Atmasasmita, 1983, Problem Kenakalan Anak-Anak Remaja, Armico, Bandung, Armico.
M. Nasir Djamil, 2013, Anak Bukan Untuk Dihukum, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.
Muladi, 22 Januari 2015, Era Baru Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, http://www.pn-palopo.go.id/index.php/berita/artikel/163-era-baru-sistem-peradilan-pidana-anak diakses tanggal 22 Nopember 2019.
Ahmad Rifai, 2010, Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim dalam Persfektif Hukum Progresif, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Airlangga, shandi patria. “Hakikat Penguasa Dalam Negara Hukum Demokratis.” Cepalo 3, no. 1, september 17, 2019: 1–10. Https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v3no1.1783.
Alfathan, dimas, sinatrya tambunan, umi rozah, a m endah, and sri astuti. “Kajian Yuridis Pemidanaan Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan (Studi Putusan Nomor 19/Pid.Sus-Anak/2018/ Pn Smg).” Diponegoro law journal, vol. 8 (program studi s1 ilmu hukum, fakultas hukum, universitas diponegoro, july 31, 2019): 143-162 https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/25989.
Ali Fikri, "Analisis Yuridis Penyelesaian Perkara Disersi Yang Diputus Secara In Absentia Sebelum Jangka Waktu 6 Bulan (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Militer Iii-12 Surabaya)." Jurnal Novum. Vol. 2, No. 14, 2015:1-9. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/novum/article/view/23996/21936.
Andani Maya Sari and Budi Setiyanto, “Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Anak,” Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, vol. 4, September 1, 2015: 266-273 https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/recidive/article/view/40740.
Arliman, laurensius, s stih, padang ; aphtn-han, and sumatera barat. “Reformasi Penegakan Hukum Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Anak Berkelanjutan Reform Of Law Enforcement Of Sexual Violence To Children As The Form Of Sustainable Children Protection.” Kanun jurnal ilmu hukum. Vol. 19, no. 2, august 27, 2311: 305–26. Http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/kanun.
Bagir Manan, 2000, Peran Hakim Dalam Dekolonialisasi Hukum dalam Wajah Hukum di Era Reformasi, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Citrawati "Analisis Yuridis Putusan Pidana Pembinaan Terhadap Anak Pelaku Pencurian Dengan Pemberatan" Verstek,” accessed july 9, 2020: 306-318 https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/verstek/article/view/33450/22046.
Chahyo, okky, nugroho, et al. “Peran Balai Pemasyarakatan Pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Tinjau Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia (The Role Of Balai Pemasyarakatan On Juvenile Justice System Reviewed From Human Rights Perspective).” Jurnal ham. Vol. 8, december 15, 2017: 161-174. Http://www.pikiranrakyat.com/bandungraya/2015/08/04/337054/sepuluh-ribu-anak-kiniberhadapan-dengan-hukum.
Ismawati "Mekanisme Penyelesaian Perkara Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Pada Masyarakat Dayak Kanayatn (Kajian Perbandingan Terhadap Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak)". Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol. 13. No. 2, accessed July 10, 2020: 198-209. http://www.dinamikahukum.fh.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/JDH/article/view/203/151.
Kumara, gd. Bagus maesha, anak agung sagung laksmi dewi, and diah gayatri sudibya. “Penahanan Anak Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan (Studi Kasus Nomor: 6/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/Pn Dps).” Jurnal analogi hukum 1, no. 1, december 17, 2019: 62–66. Https://doi.org/10.22225/.1.1.1468.62-66.
Made, ni, ita ariani, ni putu, rai yuliartini, dewa gede, and sudika mangku. “Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Terhadap Curanmor Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak Di Kabupaten Buleleng (Studi Kasus Perkara Nomor : B/346/2016/Reskrim).” Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia. Vol. 2, February 28, 2019. https://bulelengkab.bps.go.id.
Muladi, 22 Januari 2015, Era Baru Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, http://www.pn-palopo.go.id/index.php/berita/artikel/163-era-baru-sistem-peradilan-pidana-anak diakses tanggal 22 Nopember 2019.
Putra, Maksum Hadi. “Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Anak Yang Melakukan Pengulangan Tindak Pidana (Residive) Criminal Sanctions On Recidivist Children.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan. Vol. 4, August 10, 2016. https://doi.org/10.12345/IUS.V4I2.344.
Raodathul Jannah, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Oleh Anak Pelaku Bullying,” LEX CRIMEN, vol. 7, July 4, 2018: 105-113. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/20008/19616. hlm.107.
Reisasari, Mirta Diatri, and Kata Kunci. “Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Pelatihan Kerja Terhadap Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum.” IJCLC (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology) 10, no. 1, July 27, 2020: 10–19. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.1102.
Surbakti, Friwina Magnesia, and Rizkan Zuliandi. “Penerapan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan.” Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) 2, no. 1 (August 6, 2019): 143–62. https://doi.org/10.34007.
Wibowo, "Implikasi Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Terhadap Kelembagaan Dan Regulasi Pelaksana." jurnal legislasi indonesia. Vol.13 no. 2,” (accessed july 10, 2020): 121-133. Http://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/1.
Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 Jo Undang-Undang Nomor 73 Tahun 1958 tentang pemberlakukan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).
Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1979 tentang Kesejahteraan Anak.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).
Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Hakim.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2016 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak Menjadi Undang-Undang.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.
Downloads
Total Abstract Views: 180 |
Total Downloads: 104
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
