Diversion Against Crime by Children Confronting the Law to Achieve Restorative Justice

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/plr.v1i2.2120

Abstract

The purpose of this writing is to try to find out the existence of law enforcement regarding diversion in the handling of cases committed by children in the Juvenile Justice System Law and to see the effectiveness of implementing the diversion policy in handling cases of criminal acts committed by children. The research was carried out in a normative juridical manner, with a statute approach and a conceptual approach using descriptive qualitative analysis. The results of this paper show that law enforcement regarding cases involving children with a diversion policy is rigidly regulated in Law, namely Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System, as well as related regulations such as Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection, and Law -Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims. In addition to law regulations there are implementing regulations such as Government Regulation Number 65 of 2015 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversion and Handling of Children Not Aged 12 (Twelve) Years Old and Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2014 concerning Guidelines for Implementing Diversion in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. In addition, the effectiveness of law enforcement does not run effectively in practice, this shows that the diversion policy to realize restorative justice is not being implemented properly, the linkages between external and internal components are not evenly distributed, both law enforcers and the roles of stakeholders, this has an impact The diversion policy and the goal of realizing restorative justice which has not been effectively implemented are influenced by several factors such as limited Human Resources (HR) who have not supported the implementation of the SPPA Law and training for legal structures.

Keywords:

Child, Crime, Restorative Justice

References

Gultom,Maiding. 2010.Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia, Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Herlina, Apong dkk. 2004. Perlindungan Terhadap Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Marlina, Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia Pengembangan Konsep Dan Restorative Justice, Bandung: PTRefika Aditama, 2010.

MorrisandGabrielleMaxwell,RestorativeforJuveniles,Conferencing,MediationandCircles,2001, NewZealand:Allison Institute of Criminology.

Muladi, 1995. Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Semarang: B.P Dipenogoro.

Rosidah,Nikmah. 2014. Budaya Hukum Hakim Anak Di Indonesia. Semarang: Pustaka MagisteRudi Rizky, 2015, Restorative Justice (Suatu Perkenalan), Jakarta: Perum Percetakan Negara RI.

Saraswati, Rika. 2009. Hukum Perlindungan Anak Di Indonesia, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Simmonsen, 2003, dalam Correction in America: AnIntroduction, Analisa Situasi Sistem Peradilan PidanaAnak (Juvenile Justice System) di Indonesia, Indonesia: UNICEF.

Utomo,Setyo.Sistem Pemidanaan Dalam Hukum Pidana Yang Berbasis Restorative Justice, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2016

Abdul Kholiq and Jurnal Justisi, “Kajian Budaya Hukum Progresif Terhadap Hakim Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pada Mafia Peradilan (Judicial Corruption) Di Indonesia,” Justisi Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 2, 2017, http://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/teri.

Ahmad Faizal Azhar, “PENERAPAN KONSEP KEADILAN RESTORATIF (RESTORATIVE JUSTICE) DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA,” Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 134, no. 2 (October 29, 2019): 134–43,https://www.syekhnurjati.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/mahkamah/article/view/4936.

Amabarsari Hanafi arif, “Penerapan Restorasi Justise Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia,” Penerapan Restorasi Justise Dalam Hukum Pidana 53, no. 9 (2018): 1689–99, http://ojs.uniska-bjm.ac.id/aldii/article/download.

Andri Winjaya Laksana, “KEADILAN RESTORATIF DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA ANAK YANG BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK,” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 4, no. 1 (April 15, 2017): 57, https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v4i1.1644.

Azwad Rachmat Hambali, “Penerapan Diversi Terhadap Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana,” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 13, no. 1 (March 27, 2019): 15, https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2019.v13.15-30.

Bambang Hartono, “Analisis Keadilan Restoratif (Restorative Justice) Dalam Konteks Ultimum Remedium Sebagai Penyelesaian Permasalahan Tindak Pidana Anak,” PRANATA HUKUM 10, no. 2 (July 31, 2015), https://doi.org/10.36448/PRANATAHUKUM.V10I2.197.

Bambang Widodo, “NEGARA DAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE,” Jurnal Legalitas III, no. 2 (2012): 14–24, http://legalitas.unbari.ac.id › Legalitas › article › download.

Dony Pribadi, “PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP ANAK BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM,” Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist 3, no. 1 (December 14, 2018): 15–28, https://doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v3i1.110.

Gilang Ramadhan Suharto, “‘RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK DI INDONESIA,’” LEX CRIMEN, vol. 4, February 15, 2015, http://www.kemlu.go.id/canberra/Lists/LembarInfo.

Hariman Satria, “Restorative Justice: Paradigma Baru Peradilan Pidana,” Jurnal Media Hukum 25, no. 1 (October 12, 2018): 111–23, https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2018.0107.111-123.

Indrawati Indrawati, “PENERAPAN HUKUM PROGRESIF DALAM PERKARA PIDANA DI BIDANG NARKOTIKA,” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 8, no. 2 (December 24, 2017), https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v8i2.2117.

Kristian Kristian and Christine Tanuwijaya, “PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA DENGAN KONSEP KEADILAN RESTORATIF (RESTORATIVE JUSTICE) DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA TERPADU DI INDONESIA,” Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia 1, no. 2 (October 11, 2017): 592, https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v1i2.42.

Mukhidin, “Hukum Progresif Sebagai Solusi Hukum Yang Mensejahterahkan Rakyat,” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 1, no. 3 (2014): 267–86, http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/PH/article/viewFile/1488/1156.

Nurul Huda et al., “Asesmen Terpadu: Penerapan Restorative Justice Penanggulangan Kejahatan Narkotika Di Indonesia,” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 14, no. 1 (March 27, 2020): 111, https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2020.v14.111-124.

Ulang Mangun Sosiawan, “PERSPEKTIF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE SEBAGAI WUJUD PERLINDUNGAN ANAK YANG BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM (Perspective of Restorative Justice as a Children Protection Against The Law),” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 19, no. 10 (2019): 517–38, https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2016.V16.425-438.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 65 Tahun 2015 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Diversi Dan Penanganan Anak Yang Belum Berumur 12 (Dua Belas) Tahun.

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.

Bagiarta, "Diversi Gagal, Kasus Kekerasan Terhadap Siswa SMP Segera Disidangkan" di dalam https://www.balipost.com/news/2019/09/10/86760/Diversi-Gagal,Tersangka-Kasus-Kekerasan...html diakses pada 26 Oktober 2020.

Hendra Cipta, "Diversi Kasus Pengeroyokan Anak 14 Tahun hingga Tewas Gagal, Keluarga Ingin Lanjut ke Pengadilan", https://regional.kompas.com/read/2019/05/21/16550061/diversi-kasus-pengeroyokan-anak-14-tahun-hingga-tewas-gagal-keluarga-ingin?page=all di akses pada 26 Oktober 2020.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Total Abstract Views: 29 | Total Downloads: 11

Downloads

Authors

  • Zulita Anatasia Universitas Lampung

Published

2021-01-05

Issue

Section

Artikel