Correctional Institution’s Construction In The Death-Convicted Supervision

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/plr.v2i1.2212

Abstract

The death row inmate becomes one of the members of the Correctional Institution or Lembaga Pemasyarakatan (Lapas) when the convict is waiting for the execution time or if the convict is still making a legal effort. This raises problems from the aspect of the rules, which form the basis of prisons' authority in the guidance of death row inmates because the provisions on the development of capital punishment do not have specific regulations. The problem in this research is the urgency of guiding death convicts in prison; how it is implemented, and is there any difference in the guidance for death row inmates in prison; construction or ideal model of guidance for death row inmates in prison; as a result of the law, guidance on death row inmates is carried out in Lapas. This study uses a normative and empirical juridical approach with data collection methods using literature and field studies. The study results show that the prison's guidance is essential considering that the person concerned will be executed, so assistance and supervision are needed to prevent unwanted things, for example, committing a crime, suicide, or experiencing depression. Death row convicts follow other prisoners' proper guidance, provide useful activities to death convicts, and provide the death convicts with the rights. The superior construction for the development of capital punishment is contained in the Criminal Code Draft or Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (RKUHP), which makes capital punishment an alternative punishment, provides a probation period of 10 years for the death row inmates, the superior construction of both the place and the material for its guidance must be distinguished from those sentenced to other types of crimes. As a result of the law, there is no certainty of guidance for death row inmates in prison because there are no specific regulations regarding death penalty services.

Keywords:

Death , Convicted, Supervision, Institution

References

Arba’i.Yon Artiono,2015, Aku Menolak Pidana Mati Telaah Atas Penerapan Pidana Mati, penerbit KPG, Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia, Jakarta

Dirdjosisworo. Soedjono, 1984, Sejarah Dan Azaz Penologi, Ctk. Pertama ,Bandung

Maulani. Diah Gustiniati Rini Fatonah, Dona Raisa Monica, 2013, Hukum Penitensia dan Sistem Pemasyarakatan, PKKPUU FH Unila , Bandar Lampung

Sahetapy.J.E, 1979, Ancaman Pidana Mati Terhadap Pembunuhan Berencana, Alumni , Bandung

Syahrini .Riduan, 1999, Rangkuman Intisari Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung

Zaini. Ihwan, 2013, Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Pidana Mati Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Upaya Pencarian Kepastian Hukum), Publikasi Ilmiah

Tim Peneliti BPHN dan FISIP UI, 1988, Aspek-aspek yang Mempengaruhi Penerimaan Bekas Narapidana dalam Masyarakat. Laporan Penelitian, Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Kehakiman, Jakarta.

Adi Sastro, Heru Prabowo. “ANALISIS HUKUM PEMBERIAN REMISI TERHADAP NARAPIDANA DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN KLAS II A BINJAI.” JURNAL MERCATORIA 10, no. 1 (August 28, 2017): 45. https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v10i1.621.

Agustinus, Samuel, and Eko Soponyono. “PELAKASAAN PIDANA MATI DI INDONESIA PASCA REFORMASI DARI PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MAN USIA.” DIPONEGORO LAW JOURNAL. Vol. 5. Program Studi S1 Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, October 11, 2016. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/13735.

Arfa, Nys, Syofyan Nur, and Yulia Monita. “Pola Pembinaan Terhadap Narapidana Seumur Hidup Dalam Kebijakan Implementasinya.” Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora 3, no. 2 (November 25, 2019): 250–60. https://doi.org/10.22437/jssh.v3i2.8428.

Arief, Amelia. “Problematika Penjatuhan Hukuman Pidana Mati Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Hukum Pidana.” Kosmik Hukum 19, no. 1 (February 22, 2019). https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v19i1.4086.

Budiyono, Budiyono. “FUNGSI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN SEBAGAI TEMPAT UNTUK MELAKSANAKAN PEMBINAAN DAN PELAYANAN TERPIDANA MATI SEBELUM DIEKSEKUSI.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 9, no. 3 (September 30, 2009): 260–67. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2009.9.3.233.

Haryono, Haryono. “Optimalisasi Pelaksanaan Tugas Dan Fungsi Lapas Terbuka Dalam Proses Asimilasi Narapidana.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 12, no. 3 (November 23, 2018): 295. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2018.v12.295-311.

Maryanto, Maryanto, Diah Rahmawati, and Indrati Rini. “PELAKSANAAN PEMBINAAN YANG BERSIFAT KEMANDIRIAN TERHADAP NARAPIDANA DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN KELAS II B SLAWI.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 1, no. 1 (2014): 66–72. https://doi.org/10.26532/JPH.V1I1.1472.

Mulyono, Galih Puji, and Barda Nawawi Arief. “UPAYA MENGURANGI KEPADATAN NARAPIDANA DALAM LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN DI INDONESIA.” LAW REFORM 12, no. 1 (March 31, 2016): 1. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v12i1.15838.

Nurhadiyanto, Lucky. “Replacement Discourse Daftar Tunggu Terpidana Mati (Death Row) Dalam Perspektif Penologi Konstitutif Di Indonesia.” Deviance Jurnal Kriminologi 2, no. 2 (December 1, 2018): 117–38. http://journal.budiluhur.ac.id/index.php/deviance/article/view/914.

Rumadan, Ismail. “PROBLEM LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN DI INDONESIA DAN REORIENTASI TUJUAN PEMIDANAAN.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 2, no. 2 (July 31, 2013): 263. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.2.2.2013.263-276.

Sitanggang, Djernih, Efa Laela Fakhriah, and Sigid Suseno. “PERLAKUAN TERHADAP TERPIDANA MATI DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA.” Jurnal Media Hukum 25, no. 1 (October 12, 2018): 102–10. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2018.0106.102-110.

Sulton, Muchamad, Ibnu Sodiq, Andy Suryadi, and Jurusan Sejarah. “PERKEMBANGAN LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN PULAU NUSAKAMBANGAN KABUPATEN CILACAP.” Journal of Indonesian History. Vol. 7, August 31, 2018. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jih.

Sumanto, Atet. “Kontradiksi Hukuman Mati Di Indonesia Dipandang Dari Aspek Hak Asasi Manusia, Agama Dan Para Ahli Hukum.” Perspektif 9, no. 3 (2004): 192. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v9i3.347.

Susanto, Mei, and Ajie Ramdan. “KEBIJAKAN MODERASI PIDANA MATI.” Jurnal Yudisial 10, no. 2 (2017): 193–215. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29123/jy.v10i2.

Zaini, Ihwan. “Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Hukuman Mati Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Upaya Pencarian Kepastian Hukum).” Jurnal Nestor Magister Hukum. Vol. 2. Tanjungpura University, 2013. https://www.neliti.com/publications/10543/.

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Indonesia, State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3614, Law Number 12 of 1995 concerning Corrections.

Regulation of the Chief of Police of the Republic of Indonesia (Perkapolri) No.12 of 2012 concerning Procedures for the Implementation of Death Penalty.

Presidential Decree (Penpres) Number 2 of 1964 concerning the Implementation of Death Penalty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Total Abstract Views: 0 | Total Downloads: 3

Downloads

Authors

  • Azzahra Rizki Ananda Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Nusantara Lampung, Indonesia

Published

2021-04-29

Issue

Section

Artikel